The Return of Pseudosciences in Artificial Intelligence: Have Machine Learning and Deep Learning Forgotten Lessons from Statistics and History?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18656v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 08:23:23 GMT
• Title: The Return of Pseudosciences in Artificial Intelligence: Have Machine Learning and Deep Learning Forgotten Lessons from Statistics and History?
• Authors: Jérémie Sublime,
• Abstract summary: We argue that the designers and final users of these ML methods have forgotten a fundamental lesson from statistics. We argue that current efforts to make AI models more ethical by merely reducing biases in the training data are insufficient.
• Score: 0.304585143845864
• License:
• Abstract: In today's world, AI programs powered by Machine Learning are ubiquitous, and have achieved seemingly exceptional performance across a broad range of tasks, from medical diagnosis and credit rating in banking, to theft detection via video analysis, and even predicting political or sexual orientation from facial images. These predominantly deep learning methods excel due to their extraordinary capacity to process vast amounts of complex data to extract complex correlations and relationship from different levels of features. In this paper, we contend that the designers and final users of these ML methods have forgotten a fundamental lesson from statistics: correlation does not imply causation. Not only do most state-of-the-art methods neglect this crucial principle, but by doing so they often produce nonsensical or flawed causal models, akin to social astrology or physiognomy. Consequently, we argue that current efforts to make AI models more ethical by merely reducing biases in the training data are insufficient. Through examples, we will demonstrate that the potential for harm posed by these methods can only be mitigated by a complete rethinking of their core models, improved quality assessment metrics and policies, and by maintaining humans oversight throughout the process.

Related papers

• Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs [76.43407125275202]
  o1-like models can emulate human-like long-time thinking during inference. This paper presents the first comprehensive study on the prevalent issue of overthinking in these models. We propose strategies to mitigate overthinking, streamlining reasoning processes without compromising accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T18:55:12Z)
• The Multiple Dimensions of Spuriousness in Machine Learning [3.475875199871536]
  Learning correlations from data forms the foundation of today's machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) research. While such an approach enables the automatic discovery of patterned relationships within big data corpora, it is susceptible to failure modes when unintended correlations are captured. This vulnerability has expanded interest in interrogating spuriousness, often critiqued as an impediment to model performance, fairness, and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T13:29:32Z)
• RESTOR: Knowledge Recovery through Machine Unlearning [71.75834077528305]
  Large language models trained on web-scale corpora can memorize undesirable datapoints. Many machine unlearning algorithms have been proposed that aim to erase' these datapoints. We propose the RESTOR framework for machine unlearning, which evaluates the ability of unlearning algorithms to perform targeted data erasure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T20:54:35Z)
• Distribution-Level Feature Distancing for Machine Unlearning: Towards a Better Trade-off Between Model Utility and Forgetting [4.220336689294245]
  We propose Distribution-Level Feature Distancing (DLFD), a novel method that efficiently forgets instances while preserving task-relevant feature correlations. Our method synthesizes data samples by optimizing the feature distribution to be distinctly different from that of forget samples, achieving effective results within a single training epoch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T06:51:10Z)
• Advancing Brain Imaging Analysis Step-by-step via Progressive Self-paced Learning [0.5840945370755134]
  We introduce the Progressive Self-Paced Distillation (PSPD) framework, employing an adaptive and progressive pacing and distillation mechanism. We validate PSPD's efficacy and adaptability across various convolutional neural networks using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T02:26:04Z)
• Ecosystem-level Analysis of Deployed Machine Learning Reveals Homogeneous Outcomes [72.13373216644021]
  We study the societal impact of machine learning by considering the collection of models that are deployed in a given context. We find deployed machine learning is prone to systemic failure, meaning some users are exclusively misclassified by all models available. These examples demonstrate ecosystem-level analysis has unique strengths for characterizing the societal impact of machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T01:11:52Z)
• Human and AI Perceptual Differences in Image Classification Errors [13.045020949359621]
  This study first analyzes the statistical distributions of mistakes from the two sources and then explores how task difficulty level affects these distributions. We find that even when AI learns an excellent model from the training data, one that outperforms humans in overall accuracy, these AI models have significant and consistent differences from human perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T05:09:07Z)
• Explainable, Domain-Adaptive, and Federated Artificial Intelligence in Medicine [5.126042819606137]
  We focus on three key methodological approaches that address some of the particular challenges in AI-driven medical decision making. Domain adaptation and transfer learning enable AI models to be trained and applied across multiple domains. Federated learning enables learning large-scale models without exposing sensitive personal health information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T03:32:00Z)
• Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testing [62.9062883851246]
  Machine learning holds great promise for improving healthcare, but it is critical to ensure that its use will not propagate or amplify health disparities. One potential driver of algorithmic unfairness, shortcut learning, arises when ML models base predictions on improper correlations in the training data. Using multi-task learning, we propose the first method to assess and mitigate shortcut learning as a part of the fairness assessment of clinical ML systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T09:35:38Z)
• IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation [95.06031307730245]
  imitation learning from a small amount of expert data can be challenging in high-dimensional environments with complex dynamics. Behavioral cloning is a simple method that is widely used due to its simplicity of implementation and stable convergence. We introduce a method for dynamics-aware IL which avoids adversarial training by learning a single Q-function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T03:43:10Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.