Evaluating Vision-Language Models as Evaluators in Path Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18711v3
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 20:18:38 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Vision-Language Models as Evaluators in Path Planning
• Authors: Mohamed Aghzal, Xiang Yue, Erion Plaku, Ziyu Yao,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to have limited effectiveness in end-to-end planning.<n>We introduce PathEval, a novel benchmark evaluating VLMs as plan evaluators in complex path-planning scenarios.<n>Our analysis reveals that these models face significant challenges on the benchmark.
• Score: 13.391755396500155
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite their promise to perform complex reasoning, large language models (LLMs) have been shown to have limited effectiveness in end-to-end planning. This has inspired an intriguing question: if these models cannot plan well, can they still contribute to the planning framework as a helpful plan evaluator? In this work, we generalize this question to consider LLMs augmented with visual understanding, i.e., Vision-Language Models (VLMs). We introduce PathEval, a novel benchmark evaluating VLMs as plan evaluators in complex path-planning scenarios. Succeeding in the benchmark requires a VLM to be able to abstract traits of optimal paths from the scenario description, demonstrate precise low-level perception on each path, and integrate this information to decide the better path. Our analysis of state-of-the-art VLMs reveals that these models face significant challenges on the benchmark. We observe that the VLMs can precisely abstract given scenarios to identify the desired traits and exhibit mixed performance in integrating the provided information. Yet, their vision component presents a critical bottleneck, with models struggling to perceive low-level details about a path. Our experimental results show that this issue cannot be trivially addressed via end-to-end fine-tuning; rather, task-specific discriminative adaptation of these vision encoders is needed for these VLMs to become effective path evaluators.

Related papers

• Seeing is Believing: Belief-Space Planning with Foundation Models as Uncertainty Estimators [34.28879194786174]
  Generalizable robotic mobile manipulation in open-world environments poses significant challenges due to long horizons, complex goals, and partial observability. A promising approach to address these challenges involves planning with a library of parameterized skills, where a task planner sequences these skills to achieve goals specified in structured languages. This paper introduces a novel framework that leverages vision-language models to estimate uncertainty and facilitate symbolic grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T07:48:53Z)
• VIPER: Visual Perception and Explainable Reasoning for Sequential Decision-Making [21.61801132083334]
  VIPER is a novel framework for multimodal instruction-based planning. It integrates VLM-based perception with LLM-based reasoning. We show that VIPER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art visual instruction-based planners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T11:05:42Z)
• Affordances-Oriented Planning using Foundation Models for Continuous Vision-Language Navigation [64.84996994779443]
  We propose a novel Affordances-Oriented Planner for continuous vision-language navigation (VLN) task. Our AO-Planner integrates various foundation models to achieve affordances-oriented low-level motion planning and high-level decision-making. Experiments on the challenging R2R-CE and RxR-CE datasets show that AO-Planner achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T12:52:46Z)
• VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs [102.36953558562436]
  Vision language models (VLMs) are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) One understudied capability inVLMs is visual spatial planning. Our study introduces a benchmark that evaluates the spatial planning capability in these models in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T00:24:01Z)
• Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
  This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios. We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z)
• Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learning [79.38140606606126]
  We propose an algorithmic framework that fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) with reinforcement learning (RL) Our framework provides a task description and then prompts the VLM to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. We demonstrate that our proposed framework enhances the decision-making capabilities of VLM agents across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:50:19Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)
• Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [61.28463542324576]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can generate human-like outputs. We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency. We propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T17:49:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.