The Performance of the LSTM-based Code Generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) in Forecasting Time Series Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18731v1
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:18:36 GMT
- Title: The Performance of the LSTM-based Code Generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) in Forecasting Time Series Data
- Authors: Saroj Gopali, Sima Siami-Namini, Faranak Abri, Akbar Siami Namin,
- Abstract summary: This paper investigates and compares the performance of the mainstream LLMs, such as ChatGPT, PaLM, LLama, and Falcon, in generating deep learning models for analyzing time series data.
The results can be beneficial for data analysts and practitioners who would like to leverage generative AIs to produce good prediction models with acceptable goodness.
- Score: 0.3749861135832072
- License:
- Abstract: As an intriguing case is the goodness of the machine and deep learning models generated by these LLMs in conducting automated scientific data analysis, where a data analyst may not have enough expertise in manually coding and optimizing complex deep learning models and codes and thus may opt to leverage LLMs to generate the required models. This paper investigates and compares the performance of the mainstream LLMs, such as ChatGPT, PaLM, LLama, and Falcon, in generating deep learning models for analyzing time series data, an important and popular data type with its prevalent applications in many application domains including financial and stock market. This research conducts a set of controlled experiments where the prompts for generating deep learning-based models are controlled with respect to sensitivity levels of four criteria including 1) Clarify and Specificity, 2) Objective and Intent, 3) Contextual Information, and 4) Format and Style. While the results are relatively mix, we observe some distinct patterns. We notice that using LLMs, we are able to generate deep learning-based models with executable codes for each dataset seperatly whose performance are comparable with the manually crafted and optimized LSTM models for predicting the whole time series dataset. We also noticed that ChatGPT outperforms the other LLMs in generating more accurate models. Furthermore, we observed that the goodness of the generated models vary with respect to the ``temperature'' parameter used in configuring LLMS. The results can be beneficial for data analysts and practitioners who would like to leverage generative AIs to produce good prediction models with acceptable goodness.
Related papers
- Large Language Models are Few-shot Multivariate Time Series Classifiers [23.045734479292356]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively applied in time series analysis.
Yet, their utility in the few-shot classification (i.e., a crucial training scenario) is underexplored.
We aim to leverage the extensive pre-trained knowledge in LLMs to overcome the data scarcity problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T03:59:59Z) - Are Large Language Models Useful for Time Series Data Analysis? [3.44393516559102]
Time series data plays a critical role across diverse domains such as healthcare, energy, and finance.
This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) are effective for time series data analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T02:47:44Z) - Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration [90.41908331897639]
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly benefited from training on diverse, high-quality task-specific data.
We present a novel approach, ReverseGen, designed to automatically generate effective training samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T06:43:28Z) - Revisited Large Language Model for Time Series Analysis through Modality Alignment [16.147350486106777]
Large Language Models have demonstrated impressive performance in many pivotal web applications such as sensor data analysis.
In this study, we assess the effectiveness of applying LLMs to key time series tasks, including forecasting, classification, imputation, and anomaly detection.
Our results reveal that LLMs offer minimal advantages for these core time series tasks and may even distort the temporal structure of the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T07:47:31Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models [52.98743860365194]
We propose a new fine-tuning method called Self-Play fIne-tuNing (SPIN)
At the heart of SPIN lies a self-play mechanism, where the LLM refines its capability by playing against instances of itself.
This sheds light on the promise of self-play, enabling the achievement of human-level performance in LLMs without the need for expert opponents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T18:53:13Z) - Curated LLM: Synergy of LLMs and Data Curation for tabular augmentation in low-data regimes [57.62036621319563]
We introduce CLLM, which leverages the prior knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation in the low-data regime.
We demonstrate the superior performance of CLLM in the low-data regime compared to conventional generators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T12:34:46Z) - MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation.
Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results.
For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data.
For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.