Continuous Concepts Removal in Text-to-image Diffusion Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00580v2
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 05:30:24 GMT
• Title: Continuous Concepts Removal in Text-to-image Diffusion Models
• Authors: Tingxu Han, Weisong Sun, Yanrong Hu, Chunrong Fang, Yonglong Zhang, Shiqing Ma, Tao Zheng, Zhenyu Chen, Zhenting Wang,
• Abstract summary: Concerns have been raised about the potential for text-to-image models to create content that infringes on copyrights or depicts disturbing subject matter. We propose a novel approach called CCRT that includes a designed knowledge distillation paradigm. It constrains the text-image alignment behavior during the continuous concept removal process by using a set of text prompts.
• Score: 27.262721132177845
• License:
• Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models have shown an impressive ability to generate high-quality images from input textual descriptions. However, concerns have been raised about the potential for these models to create content that infringes on copyrights or depicts disturbing subject matter. Removing specific concepts from these models is a promising potential solution to this problem. However, existing methods for concept removal do not work well in practical but challenging scenarios where concepts need to be continuously removed. Specifically, these methods lead to poor alignment between the text prompts and the generated image after the continuous removal process. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach called CCRT that includes a designed knowledge distillation paradigm. It constrains the text-image alignment behavior during the continuous concept removal process by using a set of text prompts generated through our genetic algorithm, which employs a designed fuzzing strategy. We conduct extensive experiments involving the removal of various concepts. The results evaluated through both algorithmic metrics and human studies demonstrate that our CCRT can effectively remove the targeted concepts in a continuous manner while maintaining the high generation quality (e.g., text-image alignment) of the model.

Related papers

• Safeguard Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Human Feedback Inversion [51.931083971448885]
  We propose a framework named Human Feedback Inversion (HFI), where human feedback on model-generated images is condensed into textual tokens guiding the mitigation or removal of problematic images. Our experimental results demonstrate our framework significantly reduces objectionable content generation while preserving image quality, contributing to the ethical deployment of AI in the public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T05:21:41Z)
• Six-CD: Benchmarking Concept Removals for Benign Text-to-image Diffusion Models [58.74606272936636]
  Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have shown exceptional capabilities in generating images that closely correspond to textual prompts. The models could be exploited for malicious purposes, such as generating images with violence or nudity, or creating unauthorized portraits of public figures in inappropriate contexts. concept removal methods have been proposed to modify diffusion models to prevent the generation of malicious and unwanted concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T03:58:44Z)
• All but One: Surgical Concept Erasing with Model Preservation in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [22.60023885544265]
  Large-scale datasets may contain sexually explicit, copyrighted, or undesirable content, which allows the model to directly generate them. Fine-tuning algorithms have been developed to tackle concept erasing in diffusion models. We present a new approach that solves all of these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T07:04:33Z)
• Multi-Concept T2I-Zero: Tweaking Only The Text Embeddings and Nothing Else [75.6806649860538]
  We consider a more ambitious goal: natural multi-concept generation using a pre-trained diffusion model. We observe concept dominance and non-localized contribution that severely degrade multi-concept generation performance. We design a minimal low-cost solution that overcomes the above issues by tweaking the text embeddings for more realistic multi-concept text-to-image generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T12:05:44Z)
• Implicit Concept Removal of Diffusion Models [92.55152501707995]
  Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models often inadvertently generate unwanted concepts such as watermarks and unsafe images. We present the Geom-Erasing, a novel concept removal method based on the geometric-driven control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:13:10Z)
• Circumventing Concept Erasure Methods For Text-to-Image Generative Models [26.804057000265434]
  Text-to-image generative models can produce photo-realistic images for an extremely broad range of concepts. These models have numerous drawbacks, including their potential to generate images featuring sexually explicit content. Various methods have been proposed in order to "erase" sensitive concepts from text-to-image models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T02:34:01Z)
• Towards Safe Self-Distillation of Internet-Scale Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [63.20512617502273]
  We propose a method called SDD to prevent problematic content generation in text-to-image diffusion models. Our method eliminates a much greater proportion of harmful content from the generated images without degrading the overall image quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T07:48:29Z)
• Ablating Concepts in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [57.9371041022838]
  Large-scale text-to-image diffusion models can generate high-fidelity images with powerful compositional ability. These models are typically trained on an enormous amount of Internet data, often containing copyrighted material, licensed images, and personal photos. We propose an efficient method of ablating concepts in the pretrained model, preventing the generation of a target concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T17:59:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.