Pauli quantum computing: $I$ as $|0\rangle$ and $X$ as $|1\rangle$

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03109v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 08:15:31 GMT
• Title: Pauli quantum computing: $I$ as $|0\rangle$ and $X$ as $|1\rangle$
• Authors: Zhong-Xia Shang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new quantum computing formalism named Pauli quantum computing. In this formalism, we use the Pauli basis $I$ and $X$ on the non-diagonal blocks of density matrices to encode information. We show how to design Lindbladians to realize imaginary time evolutions and prepare stabilizer ground states in Pauli quantum computing.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: We propose a new quantum computing formalism named Pauli quantum computing. In this formalism, we use the Pauli basis $I$ and $X$ on the non-diagonal blocks of density matrices to encode information and treat them as the computational basis $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$ in standard quantum computing. There are significant differences between Pauli quantum computing and standard quantum computing from the achievable operations to the meaning of measurements, resulting in novel features and comparative advantages for certain tasks. We will give three examples in particular. First, we show how to design Lindbladians to realize imaginary time evolutions and prepare stabilizer ground states in Pauli quantum computing. These stabilizer states can characterize the coherence in the steady subspace of Lindbladians. Second, for quantum amplitudes of the form $\langle +|^{\otimes n}U|0\rangle^{\otimes n}$ with $U$ composed of $\{H,S,T,\text{CNOT}\}$, as long as the number of Hadamard gates in the unitary circuit $U$ is sub-linear $\mathit{o}(n)$, the gate (time) complexity of estimating such amplitudes using Pauli quantum computing formalism can be exponentially reduced compared with the standard formalism ($\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-1})$ to $\mathcal{O}(2^{-(n-\mathit{o}(n))/2}\epsilon^{-1})$). Third, given access to a searching oracle under the Pauli encoding picture manifested as a quantum channel, which mimics the phase oracle in Grover's algorithm, the searching problem can be solved with $\mathcal{O}(n)$ scaling for the query complexity and $\mathcal{O}(\text{poly}(n))$ scaling for the time complexity. While so, how to construct such an oracle is highly non-trivial and unlikely efficient due to the hardness of the problem.

Related papers

• Calculating response functions of coupled oscillators using quantum phase estimation [40.31060267062305]
  We study the problem of estimating frequency response functions of systems of coupled, classical harmonic oscillators using a quantum computer. Our proposed quantum algorithm operates in the standard $s-sparse, oracle-based query access model. We show that a simple adaptation of our algorithm solves the random glued-trees problem in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T15:28:37Z)
• Pauli-based model of quantum computation with higher-dimensional systems [0.0]
  Pauli-based computation (PBC) is a universal model for quantum computation with qubits. We generalize PBC for odd-prime-dimensional systems and demonstrate its universality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T12:05:13Z)
• Quantum Speedups for Zero-Sum Games via Improved Dynamic Gibbs Sampling [30.53587208999909]
  We give a quantum algorithm for computing an $epsilon$-approximate Nash equilibrium of a zero-sum game in a $m times n$ payoff matrix with bounded entries. Given a standard quantum oracle for accessing the payoff matrix our algorithm runs in time $widetildeO(sqrtm + ncdot epsilon-2.5 + epsilon-3)$ and outputs a classical representation of the $epsilon$-approximate Nash equilibrium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T02:56:49Z)
• Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle Model [57.663890114335736]
  We give a comprehensive characterization of the computational power of shallow quantum circuits combined with classical computation. For some problems, the ability to perform adaptive measurements in a single shallow quantum circuit is more useful than the ability to perform many shallow quantum circuits without adaptive measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T17:54:02Z)
• Exponential Separation between Quantum and Classical Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, Reordering Method and Hierarchies [68.93512627479197]
  We study quantum Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams($OBDD$) model. We prove lower bounds and upper bounds for OBDD with arbitrary order of input variables. We extend hierarchy for read$k$-times Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams ($k$-OBDD$) of width.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T12:37:56Z)
• A lower bound on the space overhead of fault-tolerant quantum computation [51.723084600243716]
  The threshold theorem is a fundamental result in the theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation. We prove an exponential upper bound on the maximal length of fault-tolerant quantum computation with amplitude noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T22:19:49Z)
• Quantum Algorithm for Fidelity Estimation [8.270684567157987]
  For two unknown mixed quantum states $rho$ and $sigma$ in an $N$-dimensional space, computing their fidelity $F(rho,sigma)$ is a basic problem. We propose a quantum algorithm that solves this problem in $namepoly(log (N), r, 1/varepsilon)$ time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T13:57:01Z)
• Quantum supremacy and hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuits [0.0]
  We prove under the theoretical complexity of the non-concentration hierarchy that approximating the output probabilities to within $2-Omega(nlogn)$ is hard. We show that the hardness results extend to any open neighborhood of an arbitrary (fixed) circuit including trivial circuit with identity gates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-03T09:20:32Z)
• Quantum learning algorithms imply circuit lower bounds [7.970954821067043]
  We establish the first general connection between the design of quantum algorithms and circuit lower bounds. Our proof builds on several works in learning theory, pseudorandomness, and computational complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T14:03:20Z)
• Quantum Gram-Schmidt Processes and Their Application to Efficient State Read-out for Quantum Algorithms [87.04438831673063]
  We present an efficient read-out protocol that yields the classical vector form of the generated state. Our protocol suits the case that the output state lies in the row space of the input matrix. One of our technical tools is an efficient quantum algorithm for performing the Gram-Schmidt orthonormal procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T11:05:26Z)
• What limits the simulation of quantum computers? [5.22339562024796]
  We demonstrate that real quantum computers can be simulated at a tiny fraction of the cost that would be needed for a perfect quantum computer. Our algorithms compress the representations of quantum wavefunctions using matrix product states (MPS), which capture states with low to moderate entanglement very accurately. For a two dimensional array of $N=54$ qubits and a circuit with Control-Z gates, error rates better than state-of-the-art devices can be obtained on a laptop in a few hours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T17:00:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.