The Global AI Vibrancy Tool

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04486v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 01:41:17 GMT
• Title: The Global AI Vibrancy Tool
• Authors: Loredana Fattorini, Nestor Maslej, Raymond Perrault, Vanessa Parli, John Etchemendy, Yoav Shoham, Katrina Ligett,
• Abstract summary: The Global AI Vibrancy Tool (GVT) is an interactive suite of visualizations designed to facilitate the comparison of AI vibrancy across 36 countries.<n>Using weights for indicators and pillars developed by AI Index's panel of experts, the Global AI Vibrancy Ranking for 2023 places the United States first by a significant margin.<n>The ranking also highlights the rise of smaller nations such as Singapore when evaluated on both absolute and per capita bases.
• Score: 4.31370360897884
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents the latest version of the Global AI Vibrancy Tool (GVT), an interactive suite of visualizations designed to facilitate the comparison of AI vibrancy across 36 countries, using 42 indicators organized into 8 pillars. The tool offers customizable features that allow users to conduct in-depth country-level comparisons and longitudinal analyses of AI-related metrics, all based on publicly available data. By providing a transparent assessment of national progress in AI, it serves the diverse needs of policymakers, industry leaders, researchers, and the general public. Using weights for indicators and pillars developed by AI Index's panel of experts and combined into an index, the Global AI Vibrancy Ranking for 2023 places the United States first by a significant margin, followed by China and the United Kingdom. The ranking also highlights the rise of smaller nations such as Singapore when evaluated on both absolute and per capita bases. The tool offers three sub-indices for evaluating Global AI Vibrancy along different dimensions: the Innovation Index, the Economic Competitiveness Index, and the Policy, Governance, and Public Engagement Index.

Related papers

• AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2025 [13.374492753616067]
  AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) project launched in 2023.<n>AGILE Index 2025 incorporates systematic refinements to better balance scientific rigor with practical adaptability.<n>AGILE Index 2025 evaluates 40 countries across income levels, regions, and technological development stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T04:28:27Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025 [39.08798007138432]
  New in this year's report are in-depth analyses of the evolving landscape of AI hardware, novel estimates of inference costs. We also introduce fresh data on corporate adoption of responsible AI practices. The AI Index has been cited in major media outlets such as The New York Times, Bloomberg, and The Guardian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T02:01:37Z)
• Evaluating AI Recruitment Sourcing Tools by Human Preference [0.0]
  This study introduces a benchmarking methodology designed to evaluate the performance of AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools. We created and utilized a dataset to perform a comparative analysis of search results generated by leading AI-based solutions, LinkedIn Recruiter, and our proprietary system, Pearch.ai. We found a strong alignment between AI-based evaluations and human judgments, highlighting the potential for advanced AI technologies to substantially enhance talent acquisition effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T10:33:43Z)
• General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Power [57.7995945974989]
  benchmarking has guided progress in AI, but it has offered limited explanatory and predictive power for general-purpose AI systems. We introduce general scales for AI evaluation that can explain what common AI benchmarks really measure. Our fully-automated methodology builds on 18 newly-crafted rubrics that place instance demands on general scales that do not saturate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T01:13:56Z)
• AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) [15.589972522113754]
  The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is profoundly transforming human society. Since 2022, the extensive deployment of generative AI, particularly large language models, marked a new phase in AI governance. As consensus on international governance continues to be established and put into action, the practical importance of conducting a global assessment of the state of AI governance is progressively coming to light. The inaugural evaluation of the AGILE Index commences with an exploration of four foundational pillars: the development level of AI, the AI governance environment, the AI governance instruments, and the AI governance effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T10:16:56Z)
• A Large-Scale Study of Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models: An Initial Look [52.114284476700874]
  This paper reports on the results of a large-scale evaluation (the TREC 2024 RAG Track) where four different relevance assessment approaches were deployed. We find that automatically generated UMBRELA judgments can replace fully manual judgments to accurately capture run-level effectiveness. Surprisingly, we find that LLM assistance does not appear to increase correlation with fully manual assessments, suggesting that costs associated with human-in-the-loop processes do not bring obvious tangible benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T01:12:35Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024 [15.531650534547945]
  The AI Index report tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data related to artificial intelligence (AI) The AI Index is recognized globally as one of the most credible and authoritative sources for data and insights on AI. This year's edition surpasses all previous ones in size, scale, and scope, reflecting the growing significance that AI is coming to hold in all of our lives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T20:59:57Z)
• A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AI [71.16123093739932]
  Embodied AI is widely recognized as a key element of artificial general intelligence. A new category of multimodal models has emerged to address language-conditioned robotic tasks in embodied AI. We present the first survey on vision-language-action models for embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T01:43:54Z)
• Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media [0.0]
  This study analyzes 37 AI guidelines for media purposes in 17 countries. Our analysis reveals key thematic areas, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and the preservation of journalistic values. Results highlight shared principles and best practices that emerge from these guidelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T22:47:56Z)
• AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment [54.93996119324928]
  We create the largest AIGI subjective quality database to date with 20,000 AIGIs and 420,000 subjective ratings, known as AIGIQA-20K. We conduct benchmark experiments on this database to assess the correspondence between 16 mainstream AIGI quality models and human perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T12:12:24Z)
• A Bibliographic Study on Artificial Intelligence Research: Global Panorama and Indian Appearance [2.9895330439073406]
  The study reveals that neural networks and deep learning are the major topics included in top AI research publications. The study also investigates the relative position of Indian researchers in terms of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T05:08:36Z)
• INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedback [80.57617091714448]
  We present InstructScore, an explainable evaluation metric for text generation. We fine-tune a text evaluation metric based on LLaMA, producing a score for generated text and a human readable diagnostic report.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:22Z)
• The Glass Ceiling of Automatic Evaluation in Natural Language Generation [60.59732704936083]
  We take a step back and analyze recent progress by comparing the body of existing automatic metrics and human metrics. Our extensive statistical analysis reveals surprising findings: automatic metrics -- old and new -- are much more similar to each other than to humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T01:13:46Z)
• The AI Index 2022 Annual Report [22.73860407733525]
  The AI Index Report tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data related to artificial intelligence. Its mission is to provide unbiased, rigorously vetted, and globally sourced data for policymakers, researchers, executives, journalists, and the general public. The report aims to be the world's most credible and authoritative source for data and insights about AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T20:59:33Z)
• Mapping global dynamics of benchmark creation and saturation in artificial intelligence [5.233652342195164]
  We create maps of the global dynamics of benchmark creation and saturation. We curated data for 1688 benchmarks covering the entire domains of computer vision and natural language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T09:16:49Z)
• Bidimensional Leaderboards: Generate and Evaluate Language Hand in Hand [117.62186420147563]
  We propose a generalization of leaderboards, bidimensional leaderboards (Billboards) Unlike conventional unidimensional leaderboards that sort submitted systems by predetermined metrics, a Billboard accepts both generators and evaluation metrics as competing entries. We demonstrate that a linear ensemble of a few diverse metrics sometimes substantially outperforms existing metrics in isolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T06:34:58Z)
• GENIE: A Leaderboard for Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of Text Generation [83.10599735938618]
  Leaderboards have eased model development for many NLP datasets by standardizing their evaluation and delegating it to an independent external repository. This work introduces GENIE, an human evaluation leaderboard, which brings the ease of leaderboards to text generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T00:40:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.