On Interpreting the Effectiveness of Unsupervised Software Traceability with Information Theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04704v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 01:29:29 GMT
• Title: On Interpreting the Effectiveness of Unsupervised Software Traceability with Information Theory
• Authors: David N. Palacio, Daniel Rodriguez-Cardenas, Denys Poshyvanyk, Kevin Moran,
• Abstract summary: Unsupervised traceability techniques often assume traceability patterns are present within textual data. We introduce self-information, cross-entropy, and mutual information (MI) as metrics to measure the informativeness and reliability of traceability links. We show that an average MI of 4.81 bits, loss of 1.75, and noise of 0.28 bits signify that there are information-theoretic limits on the effectiveness of unsupervised traceability techniques.
• Score: 12.390314973658466
• License:
• Abstract: Traceability is a cornerstone of modern software development, ensuring system reliability and facilitating software maintenance. While unsupervised techniques leveraging Information Retrieval (IR) and Machine Learning (ML) methods have been widely used for predicting trace links, their effectiveness remains underexplored. In particular, these techniques often assume traceability patterns are present within textual data - a premise that may not hold universally. Moreover, standard evaluation metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, or F1 measure can misrepresent the model performance when underlying data distributions are not properly analyzed. Given that automated traceability techniques tend to struggle to establish links, we need further insight into the information limits related to traceability artifacts. In this paper, we propose an approach, TraceXplainer, for using information theory metrics to evaluate and better understand the performance (limits) of unsupervised traceability techniques. Specifically, we introduce self-information, cross-entropy, and mutual information (MI) as metrics to measure the informativeness and reliability of traceability links. Through a comprehensive replication and analysis of well-studied datasets and techniques, we investigate the effectiveness of unsupervised techniques that predict traceability links using IR/ML. This application of TraceXplainer illustrates an imbalance in typical traceability datasets where the source code has on average 1.48 more information bits (i.e., entropy) than the linked documentation. Additionally, we demonstrate that an average MI of 4.81 bits, loss of 1.75, and noise of 0.28 bits signify that there are information-theoretic limits on the effectiveness of unsupervised traceability techniques. We hope these findings spur additional research on understanding the limits and progress of traceability research.

Related papers

• TAACKIT: Track Annotation and Analytics with Continuous Knowledge Integration Tool [0.5497663232622965]
  In the domain of geospatial tracks, the lack of such tools to annotate and validate data impedes rapid and accessible machine learning application development. This paper presents Track and Analytics with Continuous Knowledge Integration Tool (TAACKIT) to serve the critically important functions of annotating geospatial track data and validating ML models. We demonstrate an ML application use case in the air traffic domain to illustrate its data annotation and model evaluation power and quantify the annotation effort reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T21:51:51Z)
• Geospatial Trajectory Generation via Efficient Abduction: Deployment for Independent Testing [1.8877926393541125]
  We show that we can abduce movement trajectories efficiently through an informed (i.e., A*) search. We also report on our own experiments showing that we not only provide exact results but also scale to very large scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T23:11:47Z)
• Information Leakage Detection through Approximate Bayes-optimal Prediction [22.04308347355652]
  Information leakage (IL) involves unintentionally exposing sensitive information to unauthorized parties. Conventional statistical approaches rely on estimating mutual information between observable and secret information for detecting ILs. We establish a theoretical framework using statistical learning theory and information theory to quantify and detect IL accurately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T16:15:27Z)
• TRIAD: Automated Traceability Recovery based on Biterm-enhanced Deduction of Transitive Links among Artifacts [53.92293118080274]
  Traceability allows stakeholders to extract and comprehend the trace links among software artifacts introduced across the software life cycle. Most rely on textual similarities among software artifacts, such as those based on Information Retrieval (IR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T06:44:24Z)
• Data AUDIT: Identifying Attribute Utility- and Detectability-Induced Bias in Task Models [8.420252576694583]
  We present a first technique for the rigorous, quantitative screening of medical image datasets. Our method decomposes the risks associated with dataset attributes in terms of their detectability and utility. Using our method, we show our screening method reliably identifies nearly imperceptible bias-inducing artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T16:50:15Z)
• PULL: Reactive Log Anomaly Detection Based On Iterative PU Learning [58.85063149619348]
  We propose PULL, an iterative log analysis method for reactive anomaly detection based on estimated failure time windows. Our evaluation shows that PULL consistently outperforms ten benchmark baselines across three different datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T16:34:43Z)
• Unsupervised Abnormal Traffic Detection through Topological Flow Analysis [1.933681537640272]
  topological connectivity component of a malicious flow is less exploited. We present a simple method that facilitate the use of connectivity graph features in unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-14T18:52:49Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• LogLAB: Attention-Based Labeling of Log Data Anomalies via Weak Supervision [63.08516384181491]
  We present LogLAB, a novel modeling approach for automated labeling of log messages without requiring manual work by experts. Our method relies on estimated failure time windows provided by monitoring systems to produce precise labeled datasets in retrospect. Our evaluation shows that LogLAB consistently outperforms nine benchmark approaches across three different datasets and maintains an F1-score of more than 0.98 even at large failure time windows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:16:08Z)
• How Training Data Impacts Performance in Learning-based Control [67.7875109298865]
  This paper derives an analytical relationship between the density of the training data and the control performance. We formulate a quality measure for the data set, which we refer to as $rho$-gap. We show how the $rho$-gap can be applied to a feedback linearizing control law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T12:13:49Z)
• Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information Maximization [86.32278001019854]
  We propose a novel concept, Graphical Mutual Information (GMI), to measure the correlation between input graphs and high-level hidden representations. We develop an unsupervised learning model trained by maximizing GMI between the input and output of a graph neural encoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T08:33:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.