Black Swan: Abductive and Defeasible Video Reasoning in Unpredictable Events

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05725v2
• Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 20:26:05 GMT
• Title: Black Swan: Abductive and Defeasible Video Reasoning in Unpredictable Events
• Authors: Aditya Chinchure, Sahithya Ravi, Raymond Ng, Vered Shwartz, Boyang Li, Leonid Sigal,
• Abstract summary: BlackSwanSuite is a benchmark for evaluating vision-language models' ability to reason about unexpected events.<n>We curate a comprehensive benchmark suite comprising over 3,800 MCQ, 4,900 generative and 6,700 yes/no questions, spanning 1,655 videos.<n>We find significant performance gaps of up to 32% from humans on these tasks.
• Score: 33.51522765443546
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The commonsense reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs), especially in abductive reasoning and defeasible reasoning, remain poorly understood. Most benchmarks focus on typical visual scenarios, making it difficult to discern whether model performance stems from keen perception and reasoning skills, or reliance on pure statistical recall. We argue that by focusing on atypical events in videos, clearer insights can be gained on the core capabilities of VLMs. Explaining and understanding such out-of-distribution events requires models to extend beyond basic pattern recognition and regurgitation of their prior knowledge. To this end, we introduce BlackSwanSuite, a benchmark for evaluating VLMs' ability to reason about unexpected events through abductive and defeasible tasks. Our tasks artificially limit the amount of visual information provided to models while questioning them about hidden unexpected events, or provide new visual information that could change an existing hypothesis about the event. We curate a comprehensive benchmark suite comprising over 3,800 MCQ, 4,900 generative and 6,700 yes/no questions, spanning 1,655 videos. After extensively evaluating various state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, as well as open-source VLMs such as LLaVA-Video, we find significant performance gaps of up to 32% from humans on these tasks. Our findings reveal key limitations in current VLMs, emphasizing the need for enhanced model architectures and training strategies. Our data and leaderboard is available at blackswan.cs.ubc.ca.

Related papers

• Response Wide Shut? Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [54.94982467313341]
  Vision-language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general-purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems.<n>We set out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks by constructing a series of tests that probe which components of design, specifically, may be lacking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T15:26:41Z)
• VersaVid-R1: A Versatile Video Understanding and Reasoning Model from Question Answering to Captioning Tasks [44.30048178589923]
  We introduce two novel datasets designed to stimulate the model's advanced video understanding and reasoning abilities.<n>We develop VersaVid-R1, the first versatile video understanding and reasoning model under the Reason-Then-Respond paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T03:57:53Z)
• Fostering Video Reasoning via Next-Event Prediction [61.70045315542766]
  We propose next-event prediction (NEP) as a learning task that harnesses future video segments as a rich, self-supervised signal to foster temporal reasoning.<n>To support this task, we curate V1-33K, a dataset comprising 33,000 automatically extracted video segments spanning diverse real-world scenarios.<n> Experiments validate that NEP offers a scalable and effective training paradigm for fostering temporal reasoning in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T15:13:34Z)
• Video-Holmes: Can MLLM Think Like Holmes for Complex Video Reasoning? [56.06537213958482]
  We present Video-Holmes, a benchmark designed to evaluate the complex video reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>Video-Holmes consists of 1,837 questions derived from 270 manually annotated suspense short films.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals that, while these models generally excel at visual perception, they encounter substantial difficulties with integrating information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T16:05:01Z)
• IQBench: How "Smart'' Are Vision-Language Models? A Study with Human IQ Tests [1.1142124321313052]
  We introduce **IQBench**, a new benchmark designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models on standardized visual IQ tests.<n>We focus on evaluating the reasoning capabilities of VLMs, which we argue are more important than the accuracy of the final prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T13:24:08Z)
• How Well Can Vison-Language Models Understand Humans' Intention? An Open-ended Theory of Mind Question Evaluation Benchmark [0.8820880683910832]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities in Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks. However, their ability to perform Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks, such as inferring human intentions, beliefs, and mental states, remains underexplored. We propose an open-ended question framework to evaluate VLMs' performance across diverse categories of ToM tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T02:26:32Z)
• A Benchmark for Crime Surveillance Video Analysis with Large Models [22.683394427744616]
  Anomaly analysis in surveillance videos is a crucial topic in computer vision. In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have outperformed task-specific models in various domains. We propose a benchmark for crime surveillance video analysis with large models denoted as UCVL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T13:38:17Z)
• ProReason: Multi-Modal Proactive Reasoning with Decoupled Eyesight and Wisdom [42.03770972100087]
  We introduce a novel visual reasoning framework named ProReason. ProReason features multi-run proactive perception and decoupled vision-reasoning capabilities. Our experiments demonstrate that ProReason outperforms both existing multi-step reasoning frameworks and passive peer methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T03:22:06Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• Zero-Shot Visual Reasoning by Vision-Language Models: Benchmarking and Analysis [6.704529554100875]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown impressive zero- and few-shot performance on real-world visual question answering benchmarks. It remains unclear whether a VLM's apparent visual reasoning performance is due to its world knowledge, or due to actual visual reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T14:43:54Z)
• Towards Event-oriented Long Video Understanding [101.48089908037888]
  Event-Bench is an event-oriented long video understanding benchmark built on existing datasets and human annotations. VIM is a cost-effective method that enhances video MLLMs using merged, event-intensive video instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T09:14:19Z)
• WildVision: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in the Wild with Human Preferences [122.87483437694706]
  We launch WildVision-Arena (WV-Arena), an online platform that collects human preferences to evaluate vision-language models (VLMs) WV-Bench uses GPT-4 as the judge to compare each VLM with Claude-3-Sonnet, achieving a Spearman correlation of 0.94 with the WV-Arena Elo. Our comprehensive analysis of 20K real-world interactions reveals important insights into the failure cases of top-performing VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T20:53:25Z)
• VANE-Bench: Video Anomaly Evaluation Benchmark for Conversational LMMs [64.60035916955837]
  VANE-Bench is a benchmark designed to assess the proficiency of Video-LMMs in detecting anomalies and inconsistencies in videos. Our dataset comprises an array of videos synthetically generated using existing state-of-the-art text-to-video generation models. We evaluate nine existing Video-LMMs, both open and closed sources, on this benchmarking task and find that most of the models encounter difficulties in effectively identifying the subtle anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:59:01Z)
• How Far Are We from Intelligent Visual Deductive Reasoning? [41.4377002379162]
  We dig into vision-based deductive reasoning, a more sophisticated but less explored realm. We find previously unexposed blindspots in the current SOTA VLMs. We find that certain standard strategies that are effective when applied to LLMs do not seamlessly translate to the challenges presented by visual reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T18:35:54Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)
• ViLMA: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for Linguistic and Temporal Grounding in Video-Language Models [28.305932427801682]
  We present ViLMA (Video Language Model Assessment), a task-agnostic benchmark that places the assessment of fine-grained capabilities of VidLMs on a firm footing. ViLMA offers a controlled evaluation suite that sheds light on the true potential of these models, as well as their performance gaps compared to human-level understanding. We show that current VidLMs' grounding abilities are no better than those of vision-language models which use static images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T02:13:13Z)
• ACQUIRED: A Dataset for Answering Counterfactual Questions In Real-Life Videos [53.92440577914417]
  ACQUIRED consists of 3.9K annotated videos, encompassing a wide range of event types and incorporating both first and third-person viewpoints. Each video is annotated with questions that span three distinct dimensions of reasoning, including physical, social, and temporal. We benchmark our dataset against several state-of-the-art language-only and multimodal models and experimental results demonstrate a significant performance gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T22:17:03Z)
• Rephrase, Augment, Reason: Visual Grounding of Questions for Vision-Language Models [59.05769810380928]
  Rephrase, Augment and Reason (RepARe) is a gradient-free framework that extracts salient details about the image using the underlying vision-language model. We show that RepARe can result in a 3.85% (absolute) increase in zero-shot accuracy on VQAv2, 6.41%, and 7.94% points increase on A-OKVQA, and VizWiz respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T16:57:57Z)
• MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts [170.01089233942594]
  MathVista is a benchmark designed to combine challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks. The best-performing GPT-4V model achieves an overall accuracy of 49.9%, substantially outperforming Bard, the second-best performer, by 15.1%. GPT-4V still falls short of human performance by 10.4%, as it often struggles to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T17:57:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.