Toxic behavior silences online political conversations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05741v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 20:39:20 GMT
• Title: Toxic behavior silences online political conversations
• Authors: Gabriela Juncosa, Taha Yasseri, Julia Koltai, Gerardo Iniguez,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the hypothesis that individuals may refrain from expressing minority opinions publicly due to being exposed to toxic behavior. Using hidden Markov models, we identify a latent state consistent with toxicity-driven silence. Our findings offer insights into the intricacies of online political deliberation and emphasize the importance of considering self-censorship dynamics.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Quantifying how individuals react to social influence is crucial for tackling collective political behavior online. While many studies of opinion in public forums focus on social feedback, they often overlook the potential for human interactions to result in self-censorship. Here, we investigate political deliberation in online spaces by exploring the hypothesis that individuals may refrain from expressing minority opinions publicly due to being exposed to toxic behavior. Analyzing conversations under YouTube videos from six prominent US news outlets around the 2020 US presidential elections, we observe patterns of self-censorship signaling the influence of peer toxicity on users' behavior. Using hidden Markov models, we identify a latent state consistent with toxicity-driven silence. Such state is characterized by reduced user activity and a higher likelihood of posting toxic content, indicating an environment where extreme and antisocial behaviors thrive. Our findings offer insights into the intricacies of online political deliberation and emphasize the importance of considering self-censorship dynamics to properly characterize ideological polarization in digital spheres.

Related papers

• Polarized Patterns of Language Toxicity and Sentiment of Debunking Posts on Social Media [5.301808480190602]
  The rise of misinformation and fake news in online political discourse poses significant challenges to democratic processes and public engagement. We examined over 86 million debunking tweets and more than 4 million Reddit debunking comments to investigate the relationship between language toxicity, pessimism, and social polarization in debunking efforts. We show that platform architecture affects informational complexity of user interactions, with Twitter promoting concentrated, uniform discourse and Reddit encouraging diverse, complex communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T08:00:58Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Analyzing Toxicity in Deep Conversations: A Reddit Case Study [0.0]
  This work employs a tree-based approach to understand how users behave concerning toxicity in public conversation settings. We collect both the posts and the comment sections of the top 100 posts from 8 Reddit communities that allow profanity, totaling over 1 million responses. We find that toxic comments increase the likelihood of subsequent toxic comments being produced in online conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T16:10:44Z)
• Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on Twitter [5.161088104035108]
  We explore the role that partisanship and affective polarization play in contributing to toxicity on an individual level and a topic level on Twitter/X. After collecting 89.6 million tweets from 43,151 Twitter/X users, we determine how several account-level characteristics, including partisanship, predict how often users post toxic content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T17:24:47Z)
• Classification of social media Toxic comments using Machine learning models [0.0]
  The abstract outlines the problem of toxic comments on social media platforms, where individuals use disrespectful, abusive, and unreasonable language. This behavior is referred to as anti-social behavior, which occurs during online debates, comments, and fights. The comments containing explicit language can be classified into various categories, such as toxic, severe toxic, obscene, threat, insult, and identity hate. To protect users from offensive language, companies have started flagging comments and blocking users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T05:40:11Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.