Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06293v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:36:10 GMT
• Title: Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness
• Authors: Qifan Yu, Zhebei Shen, Zhongqi Yue, Yang Wu, Wenqiao Zhang, Yunfei Li, Juncheng Li, Siliang Tang, Yueting Zhuang,
• Abstract summary: We argue that a valuable sample should be informative of the task, non-redundant, and represent the sample distribution (i.e., not an outlier)<n>We propose a collaborative framework, DataTailor, which leverages three key principles--informativeness, uniqueness, and representativeness--for effective data selection.<n>Experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that DataTailor achieves 100.8% of the performance of full-data fine-tuning with only 15% of the data.
• Score: 65.01625761120924
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Instruction tuning fine-tunes pre-trained Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to handle real-world tasks. However, the rapid expansion of visual instruction datasets introduces data redundancy, leading to excessive computational costs. We propose a collaborative framework, DataTailor, which leverages three key principles--informativeness, uniqueness, and representativeness--for effective data selection. We argue that a valuable sample should be informative of the task, non-redundant, and represent the sample distribution (i.e., not an outlier). We further propose practical ways to score against each principle, which automatically adapts to a given dataset without tedious hyperparameter tuning. Comprehensive experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that DataTailor achieves 100.8% of the performance of full-data fine-tuning with only 15% of the data, significantly reducing computational costs while maintaining superior results. This exemplifies the "Less is More" philosophy in MLLM development.

Related papers

• MLLM-Selector: Necessity and Diversity-driven High-Value Data Selection for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning [69.7347209018861]
  We introduce MLLM-Selector, an automated approach that identifies valuable data for visual instruction tuning. We calculate necessity scores for each sample in the VIT data pool to identify samples pivotal for enhancing model performance. Our findings underscore the importance of mixing necessity and diversity in data choice, leading to the creation of MLLM-Selector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T12:42:37Z)
• PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection [28.442470930703337]
  PRISM is a training-free approach for efficient multimodal data selection. It uses Pearson correlation analysis to quantify the intrinsic visual encoding properties of MLLMs. It reduces the overall time required for visual instruction tuning and data selection to just 30% of conventional methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:43:41Z)
• MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks.<n>Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.<n>We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z)
• A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selection [51.46695086779598]
  Real-world datasets often contain redundant and noisy data, imposing a negative impact on training efficiency and model performance. Data selection has shown promise in identifying the most representative samples from the entire dataset. We propose a novel CLIP-powered data selection framework that leverages multimodal information for more robust and generalizable sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:00:58Z)
• Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark [3.2968976262860408]
  We investigate the effectiveness of generating synthetic data through large language models (LLMs) Our experiments show that while synthetic data can effectively capture performance of various methods for simpler tasks, it falls short for more complex tasks like named entity recognition. We propose a new metric called the bias factor, which evaluates the biases introduced when the same LLM is used to both generate benchmarking data and to perform the tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T13:20:23Z)
• Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning [127.38740043393527]
  We propose a high-value data selection approach TIVE, to eliminate redundancy within the visual instruction data and reduce the training cost. Our approach using only about 15% data can achieve comparable average performance to the full-data fine-tuned model across eight benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T16:47:25Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning [47.02160072880698]
  We introduce a self-evolving mechanism that allows the model itself to actively sample subsets that are equally or even more effective. The key to our data sampling technique lies in the enhancement of diversity in the chosen subsets. Extensive experiments across three datasets and benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of DiverseEvol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T14:10:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.