I See, Therefore I Do: Estimating Causal Effects for Image Treatments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06810v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:40:15 GMT
• Title: I See, Therefore I Do: Estimating Causal Effects for Image Treatments
• Authors: Abhinav Thorat, Ravi Kolla, Niranjan Pedanekar,
• Abstract summary: We propose a model named NICE (Network for Image treatments Causal effect Estimation) for estimating individual causal effects when treatments are images. NICE demonstrates an effective way to use the rich multidimensional information present in image treatments that helps in obtaining improved causal effect estimates.
• Score: 3.372747046563984
• License:
• Abstract: Causal effect estimation under observational studies is challenging due to the lack of ground truth data and treatment assignment bias. Though various methods exist in literature for addressing this problem, most of them ignore multi-dimensional treatment information by considering it as scalar, either continuous or discrete. Recently, certain works have demonstrated the utility of this rich yet complex treatment information into the estimation process, resulting in better causal effect estimation. However, these works have been demonstrated on either graphs or textual treatments. There is a notable gap in existing literature in addressing higher dimensional data such as images that has a wide variety of applications. In this work, we propose a model named NICE (Network for Image treatments Causal effect Estimation), for estimating individual causal effects when treatments are images. NICE demonstrates an effective way to use the rich multidimensional information present in image treatments that helps in obtaining improved causal effect estimates. To evaluate the performance of NICE, we propose a novel semi-synthetic data simulation framework that generates potential outcomes when images serve as treatments. Empirical results on these datasets, under various setups including the zero-shot case, demonstrate that NICE significantly outperforms existing models that incorporate treatment information for causal effect estimation.

Related papers

• Latent Drifting in Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Medical Image Synthesis [55.959002385347645]
  Scaling by training on large datasets has been shown to enhance the quality and fidelity of image generation and manipulation with diffusion models. Latent Drifting enables diffusion models to be conditioned for medical images fitted for the complex task of counterfactual image generation. Our results demonstrate significant performance gains in various scenarios when combined with different fine-tuning schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T01:59:34Z)
• Contrastive representations of high-dimensional, structured treatments [3.174882428337822]
  In many real-world settings, treatments can be structured, high-dimensional objects, such as text, video, or audio. We show in this paper that using such structure can lead to biased causal effect estimation. We devise a novel contrastive approach to learn a representation of the high-dimensional treatments, and prove that it identifies underlying causal factors and discards non-causally relevant factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T16:33:31Z)
• The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect Estimation [53.81860494566915]
  Existing studies leveraged proxy variables or multiple treatments to adjust for confounding bias. In many real-world scenarios, there is greater interest in studying the effects on multiple outcomes. We show that parallel studies of multiple outcomes involved in this setting can assist each other in causal identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:33:48Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Causal Inference from Small High-dimensional Datasets [7.1894784995284144]
  Causal-Batle is a methodology to estimate treatment effects in small high-dimensional datasets. We adopt an approach that brings transfer learning techniques into causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T02:04:01Z)
• To Impute or not to Impute? -- Missing Data in Treatment Effect Estimation [84.76186111434818]
  We identify a new missingness mechanism, which we term mixed confounded missingness (MCM), where some missingness determines treatment selection and other missingness is determined by treatment selection. We show that naively imputing all data leads to poor performing treatment effects models, as the act of imputation effectively removes information necessary to provide unbiased estimates. Our solution is selective imputation, where we use insights from MCM to inform precisely which variables should be imputed and which should not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T12:08:31Z)
• Deep Treatment-Adaptive Network for Causal Inference [15.695128606661294]
  Causal inference is capable of estimating the treatment effect (i.e., the causal effect of treatment on the outcome) One fundamental challenge in this research is that the treatment assignment bias in observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T04:11:23Z)
• Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data [37.15330590319357]
  Existing approaches rely on fitting deep models on outcomes observed for treated and control populations. Deep Bayesian active learning provides a framework for efficient data acquisition by selecting points with high uncertainty. We introduce causal, Bayesian acquisition functions grounded in information theory that bias data acquisition towards regions with overlapping support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T15:11:39Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• GraphITE: Estimating Individual Effects of Graph-structured Treatments [21.285425135761795]
  In some applications, the number of treatments can be significantly large. In this study, we consider the outcome estimation problem of graph-structured treatments such as drugs. Our proposed method, GraphITE, learns the representations of graph-structured treatments using graph neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T14:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.