Advancing clinical trial outcomes using deep learning and predictive modelling: bridging precision medicine and patient-centered care

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07050v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 23:20:08 GMT
• Title: Advancing clinical trial outcomes using deep learning and predictive modelling: bridging precision medicine and patient-centered care
• Authors: Sydney Anuyah, Mallika K Singh, Hope Nyavor,
• Abstract summary: Deep learning and predictive modelling have emerged as transformative tools for optimizing clinical trial design, patient recruitment, and real-time monitoring. This study explores the application of deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks [CNNs] and transformerbased models, to stratify patients. Predictive modelling approaches, including survival analysis and time-series forecasting, are employed to predict trial outcomes, enhancing efficiency and reducing trial failure rates.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence [AI] into clinical trials has revolutionized the process of drug development and personalized medicine. Among these advancements, deep learning and predictive modelling have emerged as transformative tools for optimizing clinical trial design, patient recruitment, and real-time monitoring. This study explores the application of deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks [CNNs] and transformerbased models, to stratify patients, forecast adverse events, and personalize treatment plans. Furthermore, predictive modelling approaches, including survival analysis and time-series forecasting, are employed to predict trial outcomes, enhancing efficiency and reducing trial failure rates. To address challenges in analysing unstructured clinical data, such as patient notes and trial protocols, natural language processing [NLP] techniques are utilized for extracting actionable insights. A custom dataset comprising structured patient demographics, genomic data, and unstructured text is curated for training and validating these models. Key metrics, including precision, recall, and F1 scores, are used to evaluate model performance, while trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency are examined to identify the optimal model for clinical deployment. This research underscores the potential of AI-driven methods to streamline clinical trial workflows, improve patient-centric outcomes, and reduce costs associated with trial inefficiencies. The findings provide a robust framework for integrating predictive analytics into precision medicine, paving the way for more adaptive and efficient clinical trials. By bridging the gap between technological innovation and real-world applications, this study contributes to advancing the role of AI in healthcare, particularly in fostering personalized care and improving overall trial success rates.

Related papers

• How Deep is your Guess? A Fresh Perspective on Deep Learning for Medical Time-Series Imputation [6.547981908229007]
  We show how architectural and framework biases combine to influence model performance. Experiments show imputation performance variations of up to 20% based on preprocessing and implementation choices. We identify critical gaps between current deep imputation methods and medical requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T12:33:28Z)
• TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [57.067409211231244]
  This paper presents meticulously curated AIready datasets covering multi-modal data (e.g., drug molecule, disease code, text, categorical/numerical features) and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design. We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability. We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z)
• Deployment of a Robust and Explainable Mortality Prediction Model: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond [0.59374762912328]
  This study investigated the performance, explainability, and robustness of deployed artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T18:15:53Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• SPOT: Sequential Predictive Modeling of Clinical Trial Outcome with Meta-Learning [67.8195828626489]
  Clinical trials are essential to drug development but time-consuming, costly, and prone to failure. We propose Sequential Predictive mOdeling of clinical Trial outcome (SPOT) that first identifies trial topics to cluster the multi-sourced trial data into relevant trial topics. With the consideration of each trial sequence as a task, it uses a meta-learning strategy to achieve a point where the model can rapidly adapt to new tasks with minimal updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T23:04:27Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)
• Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting the Short-Term Outcome of Resective Surgery in Lesional-Drug Resistance Epilepsy [1.759008116536278]
  Seven dif-ferent categorization algorithms were used to analyze the data. The support vector machine (SVM) with the linear kernel yielded 76.1% in terms of accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T13:04:47Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• TrialGraph: Machine Intelligence Enabled Insight from Graph Modelling of Clinical Trials [0.0]
  We introduce a curated clinical trial data set compiled from the CT.gov, AACT and TrialTrove databases (n=1191 trials; representing one million patients) We then detail the mathematical basis and implementation of a selection of graph machine learning algorithms. We trained these models to predict side effect information for a clinical trial given information on the disease, existing medical conditions, and treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T15:36:57Z)
• Literature-Augmented Clinical Outcome Prediction [10.46990394710927]
  We introduce techniques to help bridge this gap between EBM and AI-based clinical models. We propose a novel system that automatically retrieves patient-specific literature based on intensive care (ICU) patient information. Our model is able to substantially boost predictive accuracy on three challenging tasks in comparison to strong recent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T11:19:02Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.