Optimizing Sensor Redundancy in Sequential Decision-Making Problems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07686v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:20:44 GMT
- Title: Optimizing Sensor Redundancy in Sequential Decision-Making Problems
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) policies are designed to predict actions based on current observations to maximize cumulative future rewards.<n>In real-world applications, sensors are essential for measuring the current state and providing the observations on which RL policies rely to make decisions.<n>This paper explores the optimization of backup sensor configurations to maximize expected returns while keeping costs below a specified threshold.
- Score: 6.801212913428521
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) policies are designed to predict actions based on current observations to maximize cumulative future rewards. In real-world applications (i.e., non-simulated environments), sensors are essential for measuring the current state and providing the observations on which RL policies rely to make decisions. A significant challenge in deploying RL policies in real-world scenarios is handling sensor dropouts, which can result from hardware malfunctions, physical damage, or environmental factors like dust on a camera lens. A common strategy to mitigate this issue is the use of backup sensors, though this comes with added costs. This paper explores the optimization of backup sensor configurations to maximize expected returns while keeping costs below a specified threshold, C. Our approach uses a second-order approximation of expected returns and includes penalties for exceeding cost constraints. We then optimize this quadratic program using Tabu Search, a meta-heuristic algorithm. The approach is evaluated across eight OpenAI Gym environments and a custom Unity-based robotic environment (RobotArmGrasping). Empirical results demonstrate that our quadratic program effectively approximates real expected returns, facilitating the identification of optimal sensor configurations.
Related papers
- ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z) - ReSPEC: A Framework for Online Multispectral Sensor Reconfiguration in Dynamic Environments [6.718801307135799]
We introduce a framework that unifies sensing, learning, and actuation into a closed reconfiguration loop.<n>We implement and evaluate this framework on a mobile rover, showing that adaptive control reduces load by 29.3% with only a 5.3% accuracy drop compared to a baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T05:39:24Z) - ProAct: Agentic Lookahead in Interactive Environments [56.50613398808361]
ProAct is a framework that enables agents to internalize accurate lookahead reasoning through a two-stage training paradigm.<n>We introduce Grounded LookAhead Distillation (GLAD), where the agent undergoes supervised fine-tuning on trajectories derived from environment-based search.<n>We also propose the Monte-Carlo Critic (MC-Critic), a plug-and-play auxiliary value estimator designed to enhance policy-gradient algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T05:45:16Z) - Sequential Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design in Infinite Dimensions via Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning [3.2580743227673694]
High-fidelity approaches require repeated forward and adjoint PDE solves inside nested Bayesian inversion and design loops.<n>We formulate SBOED as a finite-horizon Markov decision process and learn an amortized design policy via policy-gradient reinforcement learning.<n> Numerical experiments on sequential multi-sensor placement for contaminant source tracking demonstrate approximately $100times$ speedup over high-fidelity finite element methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-09T15:44:49Z) - Cost-aware Stopping for Bayesian Optimization [53.34052774820105]
We propose a cost-aware stopping rule for Bayesian optimization that adapts to varying evaluation costs and is free of tuning.<n>We prove a theoretical guarantee bounding the expected cumulative evaluation cost incurred by our stopping rule when paired with state-of-the-art acquisition functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-16T17:54:14Z) - MDPs with a State Sensing Cost [4.880243880711163]
In many practical sequential decision-making problems, tracking the state of the environment incurs a sensing/communication/computation cost.<n>We formulate this as an expected discounted cost Markov Decision Process (MDP), wherein the agent incurs an additional cost for sensing its next state, but has the option to take actions while remaining 'blind' to the system state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T08:06:45Z) - Cost-Aware Query Policies in Active Learning for Efficient Autonomous Robotic Exploration [0.0]
This paper analyzes an AL algorithm for Gaussian Process regression while incorporating action cost.
Traditional uncertainty metric with a distance constraint best minimizes root-mean-square error over trajectory distance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T18:35:03Z) - OPUS: Occupancy Prediction Using a Sparse Set [64.60854562502523]
We present a framework to simultaneously predict occupied locations and classes using a set of learnable queries.
OPUS incorporates a suite of non-trivial strategies to enhance model performance.
Our lightest model achieves superior RayIoU on the Occ3D-nuScenes dataset at near 2x FPS, while our heaviest model surpasses previous best results by 6.1 RayIoU.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-14T07:44:22Z) - Combining Automated Optimisation of Hyperparameters and Reward Shape [7.407166175374958]
We propose a methodology for the combined optimisation of hyperparameters and the reward function.
We conducted extensive experiments using Proximal Policy optimisation and Soft Actor-Critic.
Our results show that combined optimisation significantly improves over baseline performance in half of the environments and achieves competitive performance in the others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T12:23:54Z) - REBEL: A Regularization-Based Solution for Reward Overoptimization in Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
A misalignment between the reward function and user intentions, values, or social norms can be catastrophic in the real world.
Current methods to mitigate this misalignment work by learning reward functions from human preferences.
We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z) - Dealing with uncertainty: balancing exploration and exploitation in deep
recurrent reinforcement learning [0.0]
Incomplete knowledge of the environment leads an agent to make decisions under uncertainty.
One of the major dilemmas in Reinforcement Learning (RL) where an autonomous agent has to balance two contrasting needs in making its decisions.
We show that adaptive methods better approximate the trade-off between exploration and exploitation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T13:45:33Z) - Efficient and robust Sensor Placement in Complex Environments [1.1421942894219899]
This paper addresses the problem of efficient and unobstructed surveillance or communication in complex environments.
We propose a greedy algorithm to achieve the objective.
Deep learning techniques are used to accelerate the evaluation of the objective function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T17:10:19Z) - Environmental Sensor Placement with Convolutional Gaussian Neural
Processes [65.13973319334625]
It is challenging to place sensors in a way that maximises the informativeness of their measurements, particularly in remote regions like Antarctica.
Probabilistic machine learning models can suggest informative sensor placements by finding sites that maximally reduce prediction uncertainty.
This paper proposes using a convolutional Gaussian neural process (ConvGNP) to address these issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-18T17:25:14Z) - Movement Penalized Bayesian Optimization with Application to Wind Energy
Systems [84.7485307269572]
Contextual Bayesian optimization (CBO) is a powerful framework for sequential decision-making given side information.
In this setting, the learner receives context (e.g., weather conditions) at each round, and has to choose an action (e.g., turbine parameters)
Standard algorithms assume no cost for switching their decisions at every round, but in many practical applications, there is a cost associated with such changes, which should be minimized.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T20:19:32Z) - Delayed Geometric Discounts: An Alternative Criterion for Reinforcement
Learning [1.52292571922932]
reinforcement learning (RL) proposes a theoretical background to learn optimal behaviors.
In practice, RL algorithms rely on geometric discounts to evaluate this optimality.
In this paper, we tackle these issues by generalizing the discounted problem formulation with a family of delayed objective functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-26T07:49:38Z) - Energy Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning Scheduling for Sensors
Correlated in Time and Space [62.39318039798564]
We propose a scheduling mechanism capable of taking advantage of correlated information.
The proposed mechanism is capable of determining the frequency with which sensors should transmit their updates.
We show that our solution can significantly extend the sensors' lifetime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-19T09:53:27Z) - Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimization [105.7510838453122]
We study the Safe Reinforcement Learning (SRL) problem using the Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) formulation.
We present an provably efficient online policy optimization algorithm for CMDP with safe exploration in the function approximation setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-01T17:47:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.