Protecting Confidentiality, Privacy and Integrity in Collaborative Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08534v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:48:18 GMT
• Title: Protecting Confidentiality, Privacy and Integrity in Collaborative Learning
• Authors: Dong Chen, Alice Dethise, Istemi Ekin Akkus, Ivica Rimac, Klaus Satzke, Antti Koskela, Marco Canini, Wei Wang, Ruichuan Chen,
• Abstract summary: A collaboration between dataset owners and model owners is needed to facilitate effective machine learning (ML) training. We present Citadel++, a scalable collaborative ML training system designed to simultaneously protect the confidentiality of datasets, models and training code, as well as the privacy of individual users. Our experiments show that Citadel++ provides privacy, model utility and performance while adhering to confidentiality and privacy requirements of dataset owners and model owners.
• Score: 13.97712239441817
• License:
• Abstract: A collaboration between dataset owners and model owners is needed to facilitate effective machine learning (ML) training. During this collaboration, however, dataset owners and model owners want to protect the confidentiality of their respective assets (i.e., datasets, models and training code), with the dataset owners also caring about the privacy of individual users whose data is in their datasets. Existing solutions either provide limited confidentiality for models and training code, or suffer from privacy issues due to collusion. We present Citadel++, a scalable collaborative ML training system designed to simultaneously protect the confidentiality of datasets, models and training code, as well as the privacy of individual users. Citadel++ enhances differential privacy techniques to safeguard the privacy of individual user data while maintaining model utility. By employing Virtual Machine-level Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and improved integrity protection techniques through various OS-level mechanisms, Citadel++ effectively preserves the confidentiality of datasets, models and training code, and enforces our privacy mechanisms even when the models and training code have been maliciously designed. Our experiments show that Citadel++ provides privacy, model utility and performance while adhering to confidentiality and privacy requirements of dataset owners and model owners, outperforming the state-of-the-art privacy-preserving training systems by up to 543x on CPU and 113x on GPU TEEs.

Related papers

• Enhancing User-Centric Privacy Protection: An Interactive Framework through Diffusion Models and Machine Unlearning [54.30994558765057]
  The study pioneers a comprehensive privacy protection framework that safeguards image data privacy concurrently during data sharing and model publication. We propose an interactive image privacy protection framework that utilizes generative machine learning models to modify image information at the attribute level. Within this framework, we instantiate two modules: a differential privacy diffusion model for protecting attribute information in images and a feature unlearning algorithm for efficient updates of the trained model on the revised image dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T07:55:55Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• FewFedPIT: Towards Privacy-preserving and Few-shot Federated Instruction Tuning [54.26614091429253]
  Federated instruction tuning (FedIT) is a promising solution, by consolidating collaborative training across multiple data owners. FedIT encounters limitations such as scarcity of instructional data and risk of exposure to training data extraction attacks. We propose FewFedPIT, designed to simultaneously enhance privacy protection and model performance of federated few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T08:41:22Z)
• Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework [6.828884629694705]
  This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-generative model for LLMs. PrivChatGPT consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:55:13Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning for Collaborative Data Sharing via Auto-encoder Latent Space Embeddings [57.45332961252628]
  Privacy-preserving machine learning in data-sharing processes is an ever-critical task. This paper presents an innovative framework that uses Representation Learning via autoencoders to generate privacy-preserving embedded data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T17:36:58Z)
• Group privacy for personalized federated learning [4.30484058393522]
  Federated learning is a type of collaborative machine learning, where participating clients process their data locally, sharing only updates to the collaborative model. We propose a method to provide group privacy guarantees exploiting some key properties of $d$-privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T15:43:45Z)
• Personalized PATE: Differential Privacy for Machine Learning with Individual Privacy Guarantees [1.2691047660244335]
  We propose three novel methods to support training an ML model with different personalized privacy guarantees within the training data. Our experiments show that our personalized privacy methods yield higher accuracy models than the non-personalized baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T20:16:27Z)
• Citadel: Protecting Data Privacy and Model Confidentiality for Collaborative Learning with SGX [5.148111464782033]
  This paper presents Citadel, a scalable collaborative ML system that protects the privacy of both data owner and model owner in untrusted infrastructures. C Citadel performs distributed training across multiple training enclaves running on behalf of data owners and an aggregator enclave on behalf of the model owner. Compared with the existing SGX-protected training systems, Citadel enables better scalability and stronger privacy guarantees for collaborative ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-04T04:17:29Z)
• Reliability Check via Weight Similarity in Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Machine Learning [7.552100672006174]
  We focus on addressing the concerns of data privacy, model privacy, and data quality associated with multi-party machine learning. We present a scheme for privacy-preserving collaborative learning that checks the participants' data quality while guaranteeing data and model privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T08:55:42Z)
• TIPRDC: Task-Independent Privacy-Respecting Data Crowdsourcing Framework for Deep Learning with Anonymized Intermediate Representations [49.20701800683092]
  We present TIPRDC, a task-independent privacy-respecting data crowdsourcing framework with anonymized intermediate representation. The goal of this framework is to learn a feature extractor that can hide the privacy information from the intermediate representations; while maximally retaining the original information embedded in the raw data for the data collector to accomplish unknown learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-23T06:21:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.