Bayesian optimized deep ensemble for uncertainty quantification of deep neural networks: a system safety case study on sodium fast reactor thermal stratification modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08776v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 21:06:50 GMT
• Title: Bayesian optimized deep ensemble for uncertainty quantification of deep neural networks: a system safety case study on sodium fast reactor thermal stratification modeling
• Authors: Zaid Abulawi, Rui Hu, Prasanna Balaprakash, Yang Liu,
• Abstract summary: Deep ensembles (DEs) are efficient and scalable methods for uncertainty quantification (UQ) in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) We propose a novel method that combines Bayesian optimization (BO) with DE, referred to as BODE, to enhance both predictive accuracy and UQ. We apply BODE to a case study involving a Densely connected Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) trained on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data to predict eddy viscosity in sodium fast reactor thermal stratification modeling.
• Score: 10.055838489452817
• License:
• Abstract: Accurate predictions and uncertainty quantification (UQ) are essential for decision-making in risk-sensitive fields such as system safety modeling. Deep ensembles (DEs) are efficient and scalable methods for UQ in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs); however, their performance is limited when constructed by simply retraining the same DNN multiple times with randomly sampled initializations. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel method that combines Bayesian optimization (BO) with DE, referred to as BODE, to enhance both predictive accuracy and UQ. We apply BODE to a case study involving a Densely connected Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) trained on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data to predict eddy viscosity in sodium fast reactor thermal stratification modeling. Compared to a manually tuned baseline ensemble, BODE estimates total uncertainty approximately four times lower in a noise-free environment, primarily due to the baseline's overestimation of aleatoric uncertainty. Specifically, BODE estimates aleatoric uncertainty close to zero, while aleatoric uncertainty dominates the total uncertainty in the baseline ensemble. We also observe a reduction of more than 30% in epistemic uncertainty. When Gaussian noise with standard deviations of 5% and 10% is introduced into the data, BODE accurately fits the data and estimates uncertainty that aligns with the data noise. These results demonstrate that BODE effectively reduces uncertainty and enhances predictions in data-driven models, making it a flexible approach for various applications requiring accurate predictions and robust UQ.

Related papers

• Uncertainty Quantification for Forward and Inverse Problems of PDEs via Latent Global Evolution [110.99891169486366]
  We propose a method that integrates efficient and precise uncertainty quantification into a deep learning-based surrogate model. Our method endows deep learning-based surrogate models with robust and efficient uncertainty quantification capabilities for both forward and inverse problems. Our method excels at propagating uncertainty over extended auto-regressive rollouts, making it suitable for scenarios involving long-term predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:22:59Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Improved uncertainty quantification for neural networks with Bayesian last layer [0.0]
  Uncertainty quantification is an important task in machine learning. We present a reformulation of the log-marginal likelihood of a NN with BLL which allows for efficient training using backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T20:23:56Z)
• Density Regression and Uncertainty Quantification with Bayesian Deep Noise Neural Networks [4.376565880192482]
  Deep neural network (DNN) models have achieved state-of-the-art predictive accuracy in a wide range of supervised learning applications. accurately quantifying the uncertainty in DNN predictions remains a challenging task. We propose the Bayesian Deep Noise Neural Network (B-DeepNoise), which generalizes standard Bayesian DNNs by extending the random noise variable to all hidden layers. We evaluate B-DeepNoise against existing methods on benchmark regression datasets, demonstrating its superior performance in terms of prediction accuracy, uncertainty quantification accuracy, and uncertainty quantification efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T02:47:29Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks for Geophysical Applications [0.0]
  It is common to incorporate the uncertainty of predictions such subsurface models should provide calibrated probabilities and the associated uncertainties in their predictions. It has been shown that popular Deep Learning-based models are often miscalibrated, and due to their deterministic nature, provide no means to interpret the uncertainty of their predictions. We compare three different approaches obtaining probabilistic models based on convolutional neural networks in a Bayesian formalism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T17:54:23Z)
• Probabilistic Neighbourhood Component Analysis: Sample Efficient Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning [25.8227937350516]
  We show that uncertainty estimation capability of state-of-the-art BNNs and Deep Ensemble models degrades significantly when the amount of training data is small. We propose a probabilistic generalization of the popular sample-efficient non-parametric kNN approach. Our approach enables deep kNN to accurately quantify underlying uncertainties in its prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T21:36:31Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Frequentist Uncertainty in Recurrent Neural Networks via Blockwise Influence Functions [121.10450359856242]
  Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are instrumental in modelling sequential and time-series data. Existing approaches for uncertainty quantification in RNNs are based predominantly on Bayesian methods. We develop a frequentist alternative that: (a) does not interfere with model training or compromise its accuracy, (b) applies to any RNN architecture, and (c) provides theoretical coverage guarantees on the estimated uncertainty intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T22:45:32Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural Network [66.26231423824089]
  We propose a method for training a deterministic deep model that can find and reject out of distribution data points at test time with a single forward pass. We scale training in these with a novel loss function and centroid updating scheme and match the accuracy of softmax models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T12:27:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.