Understanding Opportunities and Risks of Synthetic Relationships: Leveraging the Power of Longitudinal Research with Customised AI Tools

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09086v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 09:13:43 GMT
• Title: Understanding Opportunities and Risks of Synthetic Relationships: Leveraging the Power of Longitudinal Research with Customised AI Tools
• Authors: Alfio Ventura, Nils Köbis,
• Abstract summary: We discuss the benefits of longitudinal behavioural research with customised AI tools for exploring the opportunities and risks of synthetic relationships. These relationships can potentially improve health, education, and the workplace, but they also bring the risk of subtle manipulation and privacy and autonomy concerns. We propose longitudinal research designs with self-assembled AI agents that enable the integration of detailed behavioural and self-reported data.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: This position paper discusses the benefits of longitudinal behavioural research with customised AI tools for exploring the opportunities and risks of synthetic relationships. Synthetic relationships are defined as "continuing associations between humans and AI tools that interact with one another wherein the AI tool(s) influence(s) humans' thoughts, feelings, and/or actions." (Starke et al., 2024). These relationships can potentially improve health, education, and the workplace, but they also bring the risk of subtle manipulation and privacy and autonomy concerns. To harness the opportunities of synthetic relationships and mitigate their risks, we outline a methodological approach that complements existing findings. We propose longitudinal research designs with self-assembled AI agents that enable the integration of detailed behavioural and self-reported data.

Related papers

• Enhancing Supply Chain Visibility with Generative AI: An Exploratory Case Study on Relationship Prediction in Knowledge Graphs [52.79646338275159]
  Relationship prediction aims to increase the visibility of supply chains using data-driven techniques. Existing methods have been successful for predicting relationships but struggle to extract the context in which these relationships are embedded. Lack of context prevents practitioners from distinguishing transactional relations from established supply chain relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T15:19:01Z)
• Visual-Geometric Collaborative Guidance for Affordance Learning [63.038406948791454]
  We propose a visual-geometric collaborative guided affordance learning network that incorporates visual and geometric cues. Our method outperforms the representative models regarding objective metrics and visual quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T07:35:51Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering Research? [24.39463126056733]
  This vision paper proposes a novel approach to qualitative data collection in software engineering research by harnessing the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) We explore the potential of AI-generated synthetic text as an alternative source of qualitative data. We discuss the prospective development of new foundation models aimed at emulating human behavior in observational studies and user evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:05:52Z)
• Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review [6.013543974938446]
  Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements. A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T17:46:38Z)
• Understanding the Application of Utility Theory in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence: A Survey [5.168741399695988]
  The utility is a unifying concept in economics, game theory, and operations research, even in the Robotics and AI field. This paper introduces a utility-orient needs paradigm to describe and evaluate inter and outer relationships among agents' interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T18:55:48Z)
• A Mental-Model Centric Landscape of Human-AI Symbiosis [31.14516396625931]
  We introduce a significantly general version of human-aware AI interaction scheme, called generalized human-aware interaction (GHAI) We will see how this new framework allows us to capture the various works done in the space of human-AI interaction and identify the fundamental behavioral patterns supported by these works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T22:08:08Z)
• Human-Robot Collaboration and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Recent Research [69.48907856390834]
  Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is the approach that explores the interaction between a human and a robot. This paper proposes a thorough literature review of the use of machine learning techniques in the context of HRC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T15:14:33Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Nine Potential Pitfalls when Designing Human-AI Co-Creative Systems [19.90876596716716]
  This position paper examines potential pitfalls on the way towards achieving human-AI co-creation with generative models. We illustrate each pitfall with examples and suggest ideas for addressing it. We hope to contribute to a critical and constructive discussion on the roles of humans and AI in co-creative interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T09:27:30Z)
• Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human Intentions [46.87576410532481]
  We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise. Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions. Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.