Do Large Language Models Show Biases in Causal Learning?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10509v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:03:48 GMT
• Title: Do Large Language Models Show Biases in Causal Learning?
• Authors: Maria Victoria Carro, Francisca Gauna Selasco, Denise Alejandra Mester, Margarita Gonzales, Mario A. Leiva, Maria Vanina Martinez, Gerardo I. Simari,
• Abstract summary: Causal learning is the cognitive process of developing the capability of making causal inferences based on available information. This research investigates whether large language models (LLMs) develop causal illusions.
• Score: 3.0264418764647605
• License:
• Abstract: Causal learning is the cognitive process of developing the capability of making causal inferences based on available information, often guided by normative principles. This process is prone to errors and biases, such as the illusion of causality, in which people perceive a causal relationship between two variables despite lacking supporting evidence. This cognitive bias has been proposed to underlie many societal problems, including social prejudice, stereotype formation, misinformation, and superstitious thinking. In this research, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) develop causal illusions, both in real-world and controlled laboratory contexts of causal learning and inference. To this end, we built a dataset of over 2K samples including purely correlational cases, situations with null contingency, and cases where temporal information excludes the possibility of causality by placing the potential effect before the cause. We then prompted the models to make statements or answer causal questions to evaluate their tendencies to infer causation erroneously in these structured settings. Our findings show a strong presence of causal illusion bias in LLMs. Specifically, in open-ended generation tasks involving spurious correlations, the models displayed bias at levels comparable to, or even lower than, those observed in similar studies on human subjects. However, when faced with null-contingency scenarios or temporal cues that negate causal relationships, where it was required to respond on a 0-100 scale, the models exhibited significantly higher bias. These findings suggest that the models have not uniformly, consistently, or reliably internalized the normative principles essential for accurate causal learning.

Related papers

• How far can bias go? -- Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment [54.51310112013655]
  This study examines the correlation between gender-occupation bias in pre-training data and their manifestation in LLMs. Our findings reveal that biases present in pre-training data are amplified in model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T16:20:25Z)
• Are UFOs Driving Innovation? The Illusion of Causality in Large Language Models [0.0]
  This research investigates whether large language models develop the illusion of causality in real-world settings. We evaluated and compared news headlines generated by GPT-4o-Mini, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Gemini-1.5-Pro. We found that Claude-3.5-Sonnet is the model that presents the lowest degree of causal illusion aligned with experiments on Correlation-to-Causation Exaggeration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T15:20:49Z)
• CELLO: Causal Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [9.928321287432365]
  Causal reasoning is fundamental to human intelligence and crucial for effective decision-making in real-world environments. We introduce a fine-grained and unified definition of causality involving interactions between humans and objects. We construct a novel dataset, CELLO, consisting of 14,094 causal questions across all four levels of causality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T12:34:52Z)
• Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data. One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z)
• Nonlinearity, Feedback and Uniform Consistency in Causal Structural Learning [0.8158530638728501]
  Causal Discovery aims to find automated search methods for learning causal structures from observational data. This thesis focuses on two questions in causal discovery: (i) providing an alternative definition of k-Triangle Faithfulness that (i) is weaker than strong faithfulness when applied to the Gaussian family of distributions, and (ii) under the assumption that the modified version of Strong Faithfulness holds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T01:23:42Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Causal Discovery in Visual Model Based Reinforcement Learning [76.00395335702572]
  A central goal for AI and causality is the joint discovery of abstract representations and causal structure. Existing environments for studying causal induction are poorly suited for this objective because they have complicated task-specific causal graphs. In this work, our goal is to facilitate research in learning representations of high-level variables as well as causal structures among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T05:44:56Z)
• To do or not to do: finding causal relations in smart homes [2.064612766965483]
  This paper introduces a new way to learn causal models from a mixture of experiments on the environment and observational data. The core of our method is the use of selected interventions, especially our learning takes into account the variables where it is impossible to intervene. We use our method on a smart home simulation, a use case where knowing causal relations pave the way towards explainable systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T22:36:04Z)
• On Disentangled Representations Learned From Correlated Data [59.41587388303554]
  We bridge the gap to real-world scenarios by analyzing the behavior of the most prominent disentanglement approaches on correlated data. We show that systematically induced correlations in the dataset are being learned and reflected in the latent representations. We also demonstrate how to resolve these latent correlations, either using weak supervision during training or by post-hoc correcting a pre-trained model with a small number of labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T12:47:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.