Generalization Analysis for Deep Contrastive Representation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12014v2
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 06:21:35 GMT
• Title: Generalization Analysis for Deep Contrastive Representation Learning
• Authors: Nong Minh Hieu, Antoine Ledent, Yunwen Lei, Cheng Yeaw Ku,
• Abstract summary: We present bounds for the unsupervised risk in the Deep Contrastive Representation Learning framework. We use loss augmentation techniques to reduce the dependency on matrix norms and the implicit dependence on network depth.
• Score: 32.56004424242989
• License:
• Abstract: In this paper, we present generalization bounds for the unsupervised risk in the Deep Contrastive Representation Learning framework, which employs deep neural networks as representation functions. We approach this problem from two angles. On the one hand, we derive a parameter-counting bound that scales with the overall size of the neural networks. On the other hand, we provide a norm-based bound that scales with the norms of neural networks' weight matrices. Ignoring logarithmic factors, the bounds are independent of $k$, the size of the tuples provided for contrastive learning. To the best of our knowledge, this property is only shared by one other work, which employed a different proof strategy and suffers from very strong exponential dependence on the depth of the network which is due to a use of the peeling technique. Our results circumvent this by leveraging powerful results on covering numbers with respect to uniform norms over samples. In addition, we utilize loss augmentation techniques to further reduce the dependency on matrix norms and the implicit dependence on network depth. In fact, our techniques allow us to produce many bounds for the contrastive learning setting with similar architectural dependencies as in the study of the sample complexity of ordinary loss functions, thereby bridging the gap between the learning theories of contrastive learning and DNNs.

Related papers

• Asymptotics of Learning with Deep Structured (Random) Features [9.366617422860543]
  For a large class of feature maps we provide a tight characterisation of the test error associated with learning the readout layer. In some cases our results can capture feature maps learned by deep, finite-width neural networks trained under gradient descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T18:35:27Z)
• Generalization bounds for neural ordinary differential equations and deep residual networks [1.2328446298523066]
  We consider a family of parameterized neural ordinary differential equations (neural ODEs) with continuous-in-time parameters. By leveraging the analogy between neural ODEs and deep residual networks, our approach yields a generalization bound for a class of deep residual networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T08:29:34Z)
• Towards Size-Independent Generalization Bounds for Deep Operator Nets [0.28123958518740544]
  This work aims to advance the theory of measuring out-of-sample error while training DeepONets. For a class of DeepONets, we prove a bound on their Rademacher complexity which does not explicitly scale with the width of the nets involved. We show how the Huber loss can be chosen so that for these DeepONet classes generalization error bounds can be obtained that have no explicit dependence on the size of the nets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T14:45:34Z)
• Deep Architecture Connectivity Matters for Its Convergence: A Fine-Grained Analysis [94.64007376939735]
  We theoretically characterize the impact of connectivity patterns on the convergence of deep neural networks (DNNs) under gradient descent training. We show that by a simple filtration on "unpromising" connectivity patterns, we can trim down the number of models to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T17:43:54Z)
• A neural anisotropic view of underspecification in deep learning [60.119023683371736]
  We show that the way neural networks handle the underspecification of problems is highly dependent on the data representation. Our results highlight that understanding the architectural inductive bias in deep learning is fundamental to address the fairness, robustness, and generalization of these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T14:31:09Z)
• Compressive Sensing and Neural Networks from a Statistical Learning Perspective [4.561032960211816]
  We present a generalization error analysis for a class of neural networks suitable for sparse reconstruction from few linear measurements. Under realistic conditions, the generalization error scales only logarithmically in the number of layers, and at most linear in number of measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T15:05:43Z)
• Understanding Self-supervised Learning with Dual Deep Networks [74.92916579635336]
  We propose a novel framework to understand contrastive self-supervised learning (SSL) methods that employ dual pairs of deep ReLU networks. We prove that in each SGD update of SimCLR with various loss functions, the weights at each layer are updated by a emphcovariance operator. To further study what role the covariance operator plays and which features are learned in such a process, we model data generation and augmentation processes through a emphhierarchical latent tree model (HLTM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T17:51:49Z)
• Learning Connectivity of Neural Networks from a Topological Perspective [80.35103711638548]
  We propose a topological perspective to represent a network into a complete graph for analysis. By assigning learnable parameters to the edges which reflect the magnitude of connections, the learning process can be performed in a differentiable manner. This learning process is compatible with existing networks and owns adaptability to larger search spaces and different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-19T04:53:31Z)
• Eigendecomposition-Free Training of Deep Networks for Linear Least-Square Problems [107.3868459697569]
  We introduce an eigendecomposition-free approach to training a deep network. We show that our approach is much more robust than explicit differentiation of the eigendecomposition. Our method has better convergence properties and yields state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T04:29:34Z)
• Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning via Tensor Methods [53.808840694241]
  We advance the understanding of the relations between the network's architecture and its generalizability from the compression perspective. We propose a series of intuitive, data-dependent and easily-measurable properties that tightly characterize the compressibility and generalizability of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T22:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.