Interpretable LLM-based Table Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12386v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:44:31 GMT
• Title: Interpretable LLM-based Table Question Answering
• Authors: Giang, Nguyen, Ivan Brugere, Shubham Sharma, Sanjay Kariyappa, Anh Totti Nguyen, Freddy Lecue,
• Abstract summary: Plan-of-inputs ( or POS) is an interpretable, effective, and efficient approach to Table QA. We show that POS is most preferred among explanation methods, helps human users understand model decision boundaries, and facilitates model success and error identification.
• Score: 5.940265173828534
• License:
• Abstract: Interpretability for Table Question Answering (Table QA) is critical, particularly in high-stakes industries like finance or healthcare. Although recent approaches using Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved Table QA performance, their explanations for how the answers are generated are ambiguous. To fill this gap, we introduce Plan-of-SQLs ( or POS), an interpretable, effective, and efficient approach to Table QA that answers an input query solely with SQL executions. Through qualitative and quantitative evaluations with human and LLM judges, we show that POS is most preferred among explanation methods, helps human users understand model decision boundaries, and facilitates model success and error identification. Furthermore, when evaluated in standard benchmarks (TabFact, WikiTQ, and FetaQA), POS achieves competitive or superior accuracy compared to existing methods, while maintaining greater efficiency by requiring significantly fewer LLM calls and database queries.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Table Comprehension In The Wild [9.224698222634789]
  TableQuest is a new benchmark designed to evaluate the holistic table comprehension capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) We experiment with 7 state-of-the-art models, and find that despite reasonable accuracy in locating facts, they often falter when required to execute more sophisticated reasoning or multi-step calculations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T05:52:37Z)
• Exploring Performance Contrasts in TableQA: Step-by-Step Reasoning Boosts Bigger Language Models, Limits Smaller Language Models [6.083393426133172]
  This paper proposes a detailed prompting flow, termed Table-Logic, to investigate the performance contrasts between bigger and smaller language models (LMs) By deploying this method, we observe a 7.8% accuracy improvement in bigger LMs like Llama-3-70B compared to the vanilla on HybridQA. Our findings highlight the limitations of the step-by-step reasoning method in small models and provide potential insights for making improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T22:48:44Z)
• TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Models [53.039560091592215]
  TableRAG is a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework specifically designed for LM-based table understanding. TableRAG leverages query expansion combined with schema and cell retrieval to pinpoint crucial information before providing it to the LMs. Our results demonstrate that TableRAG achieves the highest retrieval quality, leading to the new state-of-the-art performance on large-scale table understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T04:15:02Z)
• SynTQA: Synergistic Table-based Question Answering via Mixture of Text-to-SQL and E2E TQA [25.09488366689108]
  Text-to- parsing and end-to-end question answering (E2E TQA) are two main approaches for Table-based Question Answering task. Despite success on multiple benchmarks, they have yet to be compared and their synergy remains unexplored. We identify different strengths and weaknesses through evaluating state-of-the-art models on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T07:18:45Z)
• MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation [10.726734105960924]
  Large language models (LLMs) have enabled in-context learning (ICL)-based methods that significantly outperform fine-tuning approaches for text-to- tasks. This study considers the sensitivity of LLMs to the prompts and introduces a novel approach that leverages multiple prompts to explore a broader search space for possible answers. We establish a new SOTA performance on the BIRD in terms of both the accuracy and efficiency of the generated queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T04:59:32Z)
• TabSQLify: Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs Through Table Decomposition [6.253771639590562]
  Table reasoning is a challenging task that requires understanding both natural language questions and structured data. We propose Tabify, a novel method that leverages text-to-generation to decompose tables into smaller and relevant sub-tables. Our method performs remarkably well on the WikiTQ benchmark, achieving an accuracy of 64.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T21:42:20Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• A Survey of Table Reasoning with Large Language Models [55.2326738851157]
  Using Large Language Models (LLMs) has become the mainstream method for table reasoning. We analyze the mainstream techniques used to improve table reasoning performance in the LLM era. We provide research directions from both the improvement of existing methods and the expansion of practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T07:17:52Z)
• TAP4LLM: Table Provider on Sampling, Augmenting, and Packing Semi-structured Data for Large Language Model Reasoning [55.33939289989238]
  We propose TAP4LLM as a versatile pre-processor suite for leveraging large language models (LLMs) in table-based tasks effectively. It covers several distinct components: (1) table sampling to decompose large tables into manageable sub-tables based on query semantics, (2) table augmentation to enhance tables with additional knowledge from external sources or models, and (3) table packing & serialization to convert tables into various formats suitable for LLMs' understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T15:37:04Z)
• Improving Text Matching in E-Commerce Search with A Rationalizable, Intervenable and Fast Entity-Based Relevance Model [78.80174696043021]
  We propose a novel model called the Entity-Based Relevance Model (EBRM) The decomposition allows us to use a Cross-encoder QE relevance module for high accuracy. We also show that pretraining the QE module with auto-generated QE data from user logs can further improve the overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T15:44:53Z)
• SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
  We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer. We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.