Characterizing the Networks Sending Enterprise Phishing Emails
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12403v1
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 23:15:40 GMT
- Title: Characterizing the Networks Sending Enterprise Phishing Emails
- Authors: Elisa Luo, Liane Young, Grant Ho, M. H. Afifi, Marco Schweighauser, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Asaf Cidon,
- Abstract summary: Phishing attacks on enterprise employees present one of the most costly and potent threats to organizations.
We draw on a dataset spanning one year across thousands of enterprises, billions of emails, and over 800,000 delivered phishing attacks.
We find that over one-third of the phishing email in our dataset originates from highly reputable networks, including Amazon and Microsoft.
- Score: 3.6005071324152227
- License:
- Abstract: Phishing attacks on enterprise employees present one of the most costly and potent threats to organizations. We explore an understudied facet of enterprise phishing attacks: the email relay infrastructure behind successfully delivered phishing emails. We draw on a dataset spanning one year across thousands of enterprises, billions of emails, and over 800,000 delivered phishing attacks. Our work sheds light on the network origins of phishing emails received by real-world enterprises, differences in email traffic we observe from networks sending phishing emails, and how these characteristics change over time. Surprisingly, we find that over one-third of the phishing email in our dataset originates from highly reputable networks, including Amazon and Microsoft. Their total volume of phishing email is consistently high across multiple months in our dataset, even though the overwhelming majority of email sent by these networks is benign. In contrast, we observe that a large portion of phishing emails originate from networks where the vast majority of emails they send are phishing, but their email traffic is not consistent over time. Taken together, our results explain why no singular defense strategy, such as static blocklists (which are commonly used in email security filters deployed by organizations in our dataset), is effective at blocking enterprise phishing. Based on our offline analysis, we partnered with a large email security company to deploy a classifier that uses dynamically updated network-based features. In a production environment over a period of 4.5 months, our new detector was able to identify 3-5% more enterprise email attacks that were previously undetected by the company's existing classifiers.
Related papers
- Eyes on the Phish(er): Towards Understanding Users' Email Processing Pattern and Mental Models in Phishing Detection [0.4543820534430522]
This study examines how workload affects susceptibility to phishing.
We use eye-tracking technology to observe participants' reading patterns and interactions with phishing emails.
Our results provide concrete evidence that attention to the email sender can reduce phishing susceptibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-12T02:57:49Z) - BaThe: Defense against the Jailbreak Attack in Multimodal Large Language Models by Treating Harmful Instruction as Backdoor Trigger [67.75420257197186]
In this work, we propose $textbfBaThe, a simple yet effective jailbreak defense mechanism.
Jailbreak backdoor attack uses harmful instructions combined with manually crafted strings as triggers to make the backdoored model generate prohibited responses.
We assume that harmful instructions can function as triggers, and if we alternatively set rejection responses as the triggered response, the backdoored model then can defend against jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T04:43:26Z) - Phishing Codebook: A Structured Framework for the Characterization of Phishing Emails [17.173114048398954]
Phishing is one of the most prevalent and expensive types of cybercrime faced by organizations and individuals worldwide.
Most prior research has focused on various technical features and traditional representations of text to characterize phishing emails.
In this paper, we dissect the structure of phishing emails to gain a better understanding of the factors that influence human decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T18:30:53Z) - Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Identifying Phishing Attempts [2.6012482282204004]
Phishing, a prevalent cybercrime tactic for decades, remains a significant threat in today's digital world.
This paper aims to analyze the effectiveness of 15 Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting phishing attempts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T19:55:18Z) - ChatSpamDetector: Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective Phishing Email Detection [2.3999111269325266]
This study introduces ChatSpamDetector, a system that uses large language models (LLMs) to detect phishing emails.
By converting email data into a prompt suitable for LLM analysis, the system provides a highly accurate determination of whether an email is phishing or not.
We conducted an evaluation using a comprehensive phishing email dataset and compared our system to several LLMs and baseline systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T06:28:15Z) - Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Models [96.50953637783581]
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.
Existing jailbreaking methods are computationally costly.
We propose the weak-to-strong jailbreaking attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T18:48:37Z) - Profiler: Profile-Based Model to Detect Phishing Emails [15.109679047753355]
We propose a multidimensional risk assessment of emails to reduce the feasibility of an attacker adapting their email and avoiding detection.
We develop a risk assessment framework that includes three models which analyse an email's (1) threat level, (2) cognitive manipulation, and (3) email type.
Our Profiler can be used in conjunction with ML approaches, to reduce their misclassifications or as a labeller for large email data sets in the training stage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T10:01:55Z) - Quarantine: Sparsity Can Uncover the Trojan Attack Trigger for Free [126.15842954405929]
Trojan attacks threaten deep neural networks (DNNs) by poisoning them to behave normally on most samples, yet to produce manipulated results for inputs attached with a trigger.
We propose a novel Trojan network detection regime: first locating a "winning Trojan lottery ticket" which preserves nearly full Trojan information yet only chance-level performance on clean inputs; then recovering the trigger embedded in this already isolated subnetwork.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-24T06:33:31Z) - Robust and Verifiable Information Embedding Attacks to Deep Neural
Networks via Error-Correcting Codes [81.85509264573948]
In the era of deep learning, a user often leverages a third-party machine learning tool to train a deep neural network (DNN) classifier.
In an information embedding attack, an attacker is the provider of a malicious third-party machine learning tool.
In this work, we aim to design information embedding attacks that are verifiable and robust against popular post-processing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-26T17:42:42Z) - Phishing and Spear Phishing: examples in Cyber Espionage and techniques
to protect against them [91.3755431537592]
Phishing attacks have become the most used technique in the online scams, initiating more than 91% of cyberattacks, from 2012 onwards.
This study reviews how Phishing and Spear Phishing attacks are carried out by the phishers, through 5 steps which magnify the outcome.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-31T18:10:09Z) - Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detection [56.71599262462638]
We propose to leverage user actions as a source of weak supervision to detect intents in emails.
We develop an end-to-end robust deep neural network model for email intent identification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-26T23:41:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.