A Central Limit Theorem for the permutation importance measure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13020v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:40:21 GMT
• Title: A Central Limit Theorem for the permutation importance measure
• Authors: Nico Föge, Lena Schmid, Marc Ditzhaus, Markus Pauly,
• Abstract summary: We provide a formal proof of a Central Limit Theorem for RFPIM using U-Statistics theory. Our result aims at improving the theoretical understanding of RFPIM rather than conducting comprehensive hypothesis testing.
• Score: 0.44998333629984877
• License:
• Abstract: Random Forests have become a widely used tool in machine learning since their introduction in 2001, known for their strong performance in classification and regression tasks. One key feature of Random Forests is the Random Forest Permutation Importance Measure (RFPIM), an internal, non-parametric measure of variable importance. While widely used, theoretical work on RFPIM is sparse, and most research has focused on empirical findings. However, recent progress has been made, such as establishing consistency of the RFPIM, although a mathematical analysis of its asymptotic distribution is still missing. In this paper, we provide a formal proof of a Central Limit Theorem for RFPIM using U-Statistics theory. Our approach deviates from the conventional Random Forest model by assuming a random number of trees and imposing conditions on the regression functions and error terms, which must be bounded and additive, respectively. Our result aims at improving the theoretical understanding of RFPIM rather than conducting comprehensive hypothesis testing. However, our contributions provide a solid foundation and demonstrate the potential for future work to extend to practical applications which we also highlight with a small simulation study.

Related papers

• Graph Stochastic Neural Process for Inductive Few-shot Knowledge Graph Completion [63.68647582680998]
  We focus on a task called inductive few-shot knowledge graph completion (I-FKGC) Inspired by the idea of inductive reasoning, we cast I-FKGC as an inductive reasoning problem. We present a neural process-based hypothesis extractor that models the joint distribution of hypothesis, from which we can sample a hypothesis for predictions. In the second module, based on the hypothesis, we propose a graph attention-based predictor to test if the triple in the query set aligns with the extracted hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T13:37:40Z)
• f-FERM: A Scalable Framework for Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization [9.591164070876689]
  This paper presents a unified optimization framework for fair empirical risk based on f-divergence measures (f-FERM) In addition, our experiments demonstrate the superiority of fairness-accuracy tradeoffs offered by f-FERM for almost all batch sizes. Our extension is based on a distributionally robust optimization reformulation of f-FERM objective under $L_p$ norms as uncertainty sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T03:14:16Z)
• Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals For Invertible Latent Causal Models [15.817239008727789]
  In this work, we analyze a specific type of causal query called domain counterfactuals, which hypothesizes what a sample would have looked like if it had been generated in a different domain. We show that recovering the latent Structural Causal Model (SCM) is unnecessary for estimating domain counterfactuals. We also develop a theoretically grounded practical algorithm that simplifies the modeling process to generative model estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T04:19:06Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• A Semi-Bayesian Nonparametric Estimator of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy Measure: Applications in Goodness-of-Fit Testing and Generative Adversarial Networks [3.623570119514559]
  We propose a semi-Bayesian nonparametric (semi-BNP) procedure for the goodness-of-fit (GOF) test. Our method introduces a novel Bayesian estimator for the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) measure. We demonstrate that our proposed test outperforms frequentist MMD-based methods by achieving a lower false rejection and acceptance rate of the null hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T10:36:21Z)
• FACT: High-Dimensional Random Forests Inference [4.941630596191806]
  Quantifying the usefulness of individual features in random forests learning can greatly enhance its interpretability. Existing studies have shown that some popularly used feature importance measures for random forests suffer from the bias issue. We propose a framework of the self-normalized feature-residual correlation test (FACT) for evaluating the significance of a given feature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T19:05:08Z)
• Sequential Permutation Testing of Random Forest Variable Importance Measures [68.8204255655161]
  It is proposed here to use sequential permutation tests and sequential p-value estimation to reduce the high computational costs associated with conventional permutation tests. The results of simulation studies confirm that the theoretical properties of the sequential tests apply. The numerical stability of the methods is investigated in two additional application studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T20:16:50Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• Tight Mutual Information Estimation With Contrastive Fenchel-Legendre Optimization [69.07420650261649]
  We introduce a novel, simple, and powerful contrastive MI estimator named as FLO. Empirically, our FLO estimator overcomes the limitations of its predecessors and learns more efficiently. The utility of FLO is verified using an extensive set of benchmarks, which also reveals the trade-offs in practical MI estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T15:20:41Z)
• Towards Robust Classification with Deep Generative Forests [13.096855747795303]
  Decision Trees and Random Forests are among the most widely used machine learning models. Being primarily discriminative models they lack principled methods to manipulate the uncertainty of predictions. We exploit Generative Forests (GeFs) to extend Random Forests to generative models representing the full joint distribution over the feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T08:57:52Z)
• Generalized Sliced Distances for Probability Distributions [47.543990188697734]
  We introduce a broad family of probability metrics, coined as Generalized Sliced Probability Metrics (GSPMs) GSPMs are rooted in the generalized Radon transform and come with a unique geometric interpretation. We consider GSPM-based gradient flows for generative modeling applications and show that under mild assumptions, the gradient flow converges to the global optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T04:18:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.