Equity in the Use of ChatGPT for the Classroom: A Comparison of the Accuracy and Precision of ChatGPT 3.5 vs. ChatGPT4 with Respect to Statistics and Data Science Exams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13116v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:38:13 GMT
• Title: Equity in the Use of ChatGPT for the Classroom: A Comparison of the Accuracy and Precision of ChatGPT 3.5 vs. ChatGPT4 with Respect to Statistics and Data Science Exams
• Authors: Monnie McGee, Bivin Sadler,
• Abstract summary: ChatGPT is the most popular of these platforms, and it has a paid version (ChatGPT4) and a free version (ChatGPT3.5) We determine the extent to which students who cannot afford newer and faster versions of generative AI programs would be disadvantaged in terms of writing such projects and learning these methods.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: A college education historically has been seen as method of moving upward with regards to income brackets and social status. Indeed, many colleges recognize this connection and seek to enroll talented low income students. While these students might have their education, books, room, and board paid; there are other items that they might be expected to use that are not part of most college scholarship packages. One of those items that has recently surfaced is access to generative AI platforms. The most popular of these platforms is ChatGPT, and it has a paid version (ChatGPT4) and a free version (ChatGPT3.5). We seek to explore differences in the free and paid versions in the context of homework questions and data analyses as might be seen in a typical introductory statistics course. We determine the extent to which students who cannot afford newer and faster versions of generative AI programs would be disadvantaged in terms of writing such projects and learning these methods.

Related papers

• Generative AI Takes a Statistics Exam: A Comparison of Performance between ChatGPT3.5, ChatGPT4, and ChatGPT4o-mini [0.0]
  We investigate the performance of GPT versions 3.5, 4.0, and 4o-mini on the same 16-question statistics exam given to a class of first-year graduate students. Results indicate that GPT3.5 and 4o-mini have characteristics that are more similar than either of them have with GPT4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T21:46:01Z)
• Adoption and Impact of ChatGPT in Computer Science Education: A Case Study on a Database Administration Course [0.46040036610482665]
  This contribution presents an exploratory and correlational study conducted with 37 students who used ChatGPT as a support tool to learn database administration. The usage and perceived utility of ChatGPT were moderate, but positive correlations between student grade and ChatGPT usage were found.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T20:51:28Z)
• WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild [88.05964311416717]
  WildChat is a corpus of 1 million user-ChatGPT conversations, which consists of over 2.5 million interaction turns. In addition to timestamped chat transcripts, we enrich the dataset with demographic data, including state, country, and hashed IP addresses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:00:02Z)
• The use of ChatGPT in higher education: The advantages and disadvantages [0.0]
  ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence technology developed by OpenAI. This study examines the application of ChatGPT in higher education to comprehend and produce high-level instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T09:00:05Z)
• "ChatGPT, a Friend or Foe for Education?" Analyzing the User's Perspectives on the Latest AI Chatbot Via Reddit [0.0]
  This study has analyzed 247 Reddit top posts related to the educational use of ChatGPT. Results show that the majority of the users took a neutral viewpoint. There was more positive perception than negative regarding the usefulness of ChatGPT in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T23:59:44Z)
• Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses [15.642614735026106]
  We compare the performance of ChatGPT against students on 32 university-level courses. We find that ChatGPT's performance is comparable, if not superior, to that of students in many courses. We find an emerging consensus among students to use the tool, and among educators to treat this as plagiarism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-07T10:37:51Z)
• AI, write an essay for me: A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays [66.36541161082856]
  ChatGPT and similar generative AI models have attracted hundreds of millions of users. This study compares human-written versus ChatGPT-generated argumentative student essays.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T12:58:28Z)
• One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Era [95.2284704286191]
  GPT-4 (a.k.a. ChatGPT plus) is one small step for generative AI (GAI) but one giant leap for artificial general intelligence (AGI) Since its official release in November 2022, ChatGPT has quickly attracted numerous users with extensive media coverage. This work is the first to survey ChatGPT with a comprehensive review of its underlying technology, applications, and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T06:22:09Z)
• Using 3D printed badges to improve student performance and reduce dropout rates in STEM higher education [59.58137104470497]
  This contribution hypothesizes that the use of badges, both physical and virtual, improves student performance and reduces dropout rates. The results show that the usage of badges improves student performance and reduces dropout rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T21:09:57Z)
• BiasTestGPT: Using ChatGPT for Social Bias Testing of Language Models [73.29106813131818]
  bias testing is currently cumbersome since the test sentences are generated from a limited set of manual templates or need expensive crowd-sourcing. We propose using ChatGPT for the controllable generation of test sentences, given any arbitrary user-specified combination of social groups and attributes. We present an open-source comprehensive bias testing framework (BiasTestGPT), hosted on HuggingFace, that can be plugged into any open-source PLM for bias testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T22:07:57Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.