Related papers: The use of ChatGPT in higher education: The advantages and disadvantages

The use of ChatGPT in higher education: The advantages and disadvantages

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19245v1
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:00:05 GMT
Title: The use of ChatGPT in higher education: The advantages and disadvantages
Authors: Joshua Ebere Chukwuere,
Abstract summary: ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence technology developed by OpenAI. This study examines the application of ChatGPT in higher education to comprehend and produce high-level instruction.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Abstract: Higher education scholars are interested in an artificial intelligence (AI) technology called ChatGPT, which was developed by OpenAI. Whether ChatGPT can improve learning is still a topic of debate among experts. This concise overview of the literature examines the application of ChatGPT in higher education to comprehend and produce high-level instruction. By examining the essential literature, this study seeks to provide a thorough assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing ChatGPT in higher education settings. But it's crucial to consider both the positive and negative elements. For this rapid review, the researcher searched Google Scholar, Scopus, and others between January 2023 and July 2023 for prior research from various publications. These studies were examined. The study found that employing ChatGPT in higher education is beneficial for a number of reasons. It can provide individualized instruction, and prompt feedback, facilitate access to learning, and promote student interaction. These benefits could improve the learning environment and make it more fun for academics and students. The cons of ChatGPT are equally present. These problems include the inability to comprehend emotions, the lack of social interaction chances, technological limitations, and the dangers of depending too much on ChatGPT for higher education. Higher education should combine ChatGPT with other teaching techniques to provide students and lecturers with a comprehensive education. However, it is crucial to consider the positives, negatives, and moral issues before adopting ChatGPT in the classroom.

Related papers

Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z)
Chatbot-supported Thesis Writing: An Autoethnographic Report [0.0]
ChatGPT might be applied to formats that require learners to generate text, such as bachelor theses or student research papers. ChatGPT is to be valued as a beneficial tool in thesis writing. However, writing a conclusive thesis still requires the learner's meaningful engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T09:09:26Z)
"ChatGPT, a Friend or Foe for Education?" Analyzing the User's Perspectives on the Latest AI Chatbot Via Reddit [0.0]
This study has analyzed 247 Reddit top posts related to the educational use of ChatGPT. Results show that the majority of the users took a neutral viewpoint. There was more positive perception than negative regarding the usefulness of ChatGPT in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T23:59:44Z)
Can ChatGPT pass the Vietnamese National High School Graduation Examination? [0.0]
The study dataset included 30 essays in the literature test case and 1,700 multiple-choice questions designed for other subjects. ChatGPT was able to pass the examination with an average score of 6-7, demonstrating the technology's potential to revolutionize the educational landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T14:47:03Z)
Transformative Effects of ChatGPT on Modern Education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots [36.760677949631514]
ChatGPT was released to provide coherent and useful replies based on analysis of large volumes of data. Our preliminary evaluation concludes that ChatGPT performed differently in each subject area including finance, coding and maths. There are clear drawbacks in its use, such as the possibility of producing inaccurate or false data. Academic regulations and evaluation practices need to be updated, should ChatGPT be used as a tool in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T17:35:57Z)
Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and Implications for AI-Integrated Education [40.38809129759498]
ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training. On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation. On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:13:14Z)
To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Models [49.52083248451775]
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in NLP. We specifically focus on ChatGPT, a widely used and easily accessible LLM. We conduct a series of experiments on 11 datasets to evaluate ChatGPT's commonsense abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-29T03:05:43Z)
Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)
Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.