Detecting Dark Patterns in User Interfaces Using Logistic Regression and Bag-of-Words Representation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14187v1
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:29:46 GMT
- Title: Detecting Dark Patterns in User Interfaces Using Logistic Regression and Bag-of-Words Representation
- Authors: Aliyu Umar, Maaruf Lawan, Adamu Lawan, Abdullahi Abdulkadir, Mukhtar Dahiru,
- Abstract summary: Dark patterns in user interfaces represent deceptive design practices intended to manipulate users' behavior.
This paper proposes a novel approach for detecting dark patterns in user interfaces using logistic regression and bag-of-words representation.
Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in accurately identifying instances of dark patterns.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Dark patterns in user interfaces represent deceptive design practices intended to manipulate users' behavior, often leading to unintended consequences such as coerced purchases, involuntary data disclosures, or user frustration. Detecting and mitigating these dark patterns is crucial for promoting transparency, trust, and ethical design practices in digital environments. This paper proposes a novel approach for detecting dark patterns in user interfaces using logistic regression and bag-of-words representation. Our methodology involves collecting a diverse dataset of user interface text samples, preprocessing the data, extracting text features using the bag-of-words representation, training a logistic regression model, and evaluating its performance using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in accurately identifying instances of dark patterns, with high predictive performance and robustness to variations in dataset composition and model parameters. The insights gained from this study contribute to the growing body of knowledge on dark patterns detection and classification, offering practical implications for designers, developers, and policymakers in promoting ethical design practices and protecting user rights in digital environments.
Related papers
- Towards Reliable Verification of Unauthorized Data Usage in Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [23.09033991200197]
New personalization techniques have been proposed to customize the pre-trained base models for crafting images with specific themes or styles.
Such a lightweight solution poses a new concern regarding whether the personalized models are trained from unauthorized data.
We introduce SIREN, a novel methodology to proactively trace unauthorized data usage in black-box personalized text-to-image diffusion models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T12:29:23Z) - Preserving Individuality while Following the Crowd: Understanding the Role of User Taste and Crowd Wisdom in Online Product Rating Prediction [31.42047941275096]
We propose a unique and practical approach that emphasizes historical ratings at both the user and product levels.
We have developed an efficient data processing strategy that makes this approach highly scalable and easily deployable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-06T23:16:06Z) - A Simple Background Augmentation Method for Object Detection with Diffusion Model [53.32935683257045]
In computer vision, it is well-known that a lack of data diversity will impair model performance.
We propose a simple yet effective data augmentation approach by leveraging advancements in generative models.
Background augmentation, in particular, significantly improves the models' robustness and generalization capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T07:40:00Z) - Thinking Racial Bias in Fair Forgery Detection: Models, Datasets and Evaluations [63.52709761339949]
We first contribute a dedicated dataset called the Fair Forgery Detection (FairFD) dataset, where we prove the racial bias of public state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.
We design novel metrics including Approach Averaged Metric and Utility Regularized Metric, which can avoid deceptive results.
We also present an effective and robust post-processing technique, Bias Pruning with Fair Activations (BPFA), which improves fairness without requiring retraining or weight updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T14:53:18Z) - Detecting Deceptive Dark Patterns in E-commerce Platforms [0.0]
Dark patterns are deceptive user interfaces employed by e-commerce websites to manipulate user's behavior in a way that benefits the website, often unethically.
Existing solutions include UIGuard, which uses computer vision and natural language processing, and approaches that categorize dark patterns based on detectability or utilize machine learning models trained on datasets.
We propose combining web scraping techniques with fine-tuned BERT language models and generative capabilities to identify dark patterns, including outliers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T16:32:40Z) - Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models [36.05242956018461]
In this paper, we establish a bridge between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection.
We first validate the hypothesis of our proposed outlier gradient analysis approach on synthetic datasets.
We then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models and selecting data samples for improving performance of natural language processing transformer models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T21:34:46Z) - Understanding Before Recommendation: Semantic Aspect-Aware Review Exploitation via Large Language Models [53.337728969143086]
Recommendation systems harness user-item interactions like clicks and reviews to learn their representations.
Previous studies improve recommendation accuracy and interpretability by modeling user preferences across various aspects and intents.
We introduce a chain-based prompting approach to uncover semantic aspect-aware interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T15:44:09Z) - Towards General Visual-Linguistic Face Forgery Detection [95.73987327101143]
Deepfakes are realistic face manipulations that can pose serious threats to security, privacy, and trust.
Existing methods mostly treat this task as binary classification, which uses digital labels or mask signals to train the detection model.
We propose a novel paradigm named Visual-Linguistic Face Forgery Detection(VLFFD), which uses fine-grained sentence-level prompts as the annotation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T10:22:33Z) - Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation
Profiles [69.9674326582747]
This paper presents a visual framework to investigate neural network models subjected to adversarial examples.
We show how observing these elements can quickly pinpoint exploited areas in a model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T13:04:21Z) - Generative Counterfactuals for Neural Networks via Attribute-Informed
Perturbation [51.29486247405601]
We design a framework to generate counterfactuals for raw data instances with the proposed Attribute-Informed Perturbation (AIP)
By utilizing generative models conditioned with different attributes, counterfactuals with desired labels can be obtained effectively and efficiently.
Experimental results on real-world texts and images demonstrate the effectiveness, sample quality as well as efficiency of our designed framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-18T08:37:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.