Query pipeline optimization for cancer patient question answering systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14751v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:30:07 GMT
• Title: Query pipeline optimization for cancer patient question answering systems
• Authors: Maolin He, Rena Gao, Mike Conway, Brian E. Chapman,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mitigates hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs) by using query pipelines to retrieve relevant external information.<n>We propose a novel three-aspect optimization approach for the RAG query pipeline in cancer question-answering systems.
• Score: 0.8437187555622164
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mitigates hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs) by using query pipelines to retrieve relevant external information and grounding responses in retrieved knowledge. However, query pipeline optimization for cancer patient question-answering (CPQA) systems requires separately optimizing multiple components with domain-specific considerations. We propose a novel three-aspect optimization approach for the RAG query pipeline in CPQA systems, utilizing public biomedical databases like PubMed and PubMed Central. Our optimization includes: (1) document retrieval, utilizing a comparative analysis of NCBI resources and introducing Hybrid Semantic Real-time Document Retrieval (HSRDR); (2) passage retrieval, identifying optimal pairings of dense retrievers and rerankers; and (3) semantic representation, introducing Semantic Enhanced Overlap Segmentation (SEOS) for improved contextual understanding. On a custom-developed dataset tailored for cancer-related inquiries, our optimized RAG approach improved the answer accuracy of Claude-3-haiku by 5.24% over chain-of-thought prompting and about 3% over a naive RAG setup. This study highlights the importance of domain-specific query optimization in realizing the full potential of RAG and provides a robust framework for building more accurate and reliable CPQA systems, advancing the development of RAG-based biomedical systems.

Related papers

• Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z)
• Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG [51.120170062795566]
  We propose Divide-Then-Align (DTA) to endow RAG systems with the ability to respond with "I don't know" when the query is out of the knowledge boundary.<n>DTA balances accuracy with appropriate abstention, enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T08:21:21Z)
• Self-Routing RAG: Binding Selective Retrieval with Knowledge Verbalization [97.72503890388866]
  We propose Self-Routing RAG (SR-RAG), a novel framework that binds selective retrieval with knowledge verbalization. SR-RAG enables an LLM to dynamically decide between external retrieval and verbalizing its own parametric knowledge. We introduce dynamic knowledge source inference via nearest neighbor search to improve the accuracy of knowledge source decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T17:59:30Z)
• HawkBench: Investigating Resilience of RAG Methods on Stratified Information-Seeking Tasks [50.871243190126826]
  HawkBench is a human-labeled, multi-domain benchmark designed to rigorously assess RAG performance. By stratifying tasks based on information-seeking behaviors, HawkBench provides a systematic evaluation of how well RAG systems adapt to diverse user needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T06:33:39Z)
• Transparent NLP: Using RAG and LLM Alignment for Privacy Q&A [15.86510147965235]
  General Data Protection Regulation requires precise processing information to be clear and accessible. This paper examines state-of-the-art Retrieval Generation (RAG) systems enhanced with alignment techniques to fulfill obligations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:42:00Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retreival Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Medical Question Answering [70.44269982045415]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) We introduce Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (MedRGB) that provides various supplementary elements to four medical QA datasets. Our experimental results reveals current models' limited ability to handle noise and misinformation in the retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T06:19:18Z)
• Query Optimization for Parametric Knowledge Refinement in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [26.353428245346166]
  The Extract-Refine-Retrieve-Read (ERRR) framework is designed to bridge the pre-retrieval information gap in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Unlike conventional query optimization techniques used in RAG, the ERRR framework begins by extracting knowledge from Large Language Models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T14:12:45Z)
• Toward Optimal Search and Retrieval for RAG [39.69494982983534]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a promising method for addressing some of the memory-related challenges associated with Large Language Models (LLMs) Here, we work towards the goal of understanding how retrievers can be optimized for RAG pipelines for common tasks such as Question Answering (QA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T22:06:51Z)
• Do RAG Systems Cover What Matters? Evaluating and Optimizing Responses with Sub-Question Coverage [74.70255719194819]
  We introduce a novel framework based on sub-question coverage, which measures how well a RAG system addresses different facets of a question. We use this framework to evaluate three commercial generative answer engines: You.com, Perplexity AI, and Bing Chat. We find that while all answer engines cover core sub-questions more often than background or follow-up ones, they still miss around 50% of core sub-questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T22:59:34Z)
• Telco-DPR: A Hybrid Dataset for Evaluating Retrieval Models of 3GPP Technical Specifications [0.8999666725996975]
  This paper proposes a Question-Answering (QA) system for the telecom domain using 3rd Generation Partnership Project technical documents. A hybrid dataset, Telco-DPR, is presented, combining text and tables, and includes a set of synthetic question/answer pairs. The retrieval models are evaluated and compared using top-K accuracy and Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) The proposed QA system, using the developed RAG model and the Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)-4, achieves a 14% improvement in answer accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T16:37:18Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios. With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance. Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• The Geometry of Queries: Query-Based Innovations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Healthcare QA [1.2839205715237014]
  QB-RAG is a framework for enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems in healthcare question-answering.<n>A key component of QB-RAG is an LLM-based filtering mechanism that ensures that only relevant and answerable questions are included in the database.<n>Our empirical evaluation on a healthcare data set demonstrates the superior performance of QB-RAG compared to existing retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T13:47:01Z)
• Blended RAG: Improving RAG (Retriever-Augmented Generation) Accuracy with Semantic Search and Hybrid Query-Based Retrievers [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a prevalent approach to infuse a private knowledge base of documents with Large Language Models (LLM) to build Generative Q&A (Question-Answering) systems. We propose the 'Blended RAG' method of leveraging semantic search techniques, such as Vector indexes and Sparse indexes, blended with hybrid query strategies. Our study achieves better retrieval results and sets new benchmarks for IR (Information Retrieval) datasets like NQ and TREC-COVID datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T17:13:46Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey [17.82361213043507]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) showcase impressive capabilities but encounter challenges like hallucination. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution by incorporating knowledge from external databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T07:47:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.