Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15247v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 17:08:34 GMT
• Title: Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models
• Authors: Fouad Trad, Ryan Yammine, Jana Charafeddine, Marlene Chakhtoura, Maya Rahme, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ali Chehab,
• Abstract summary: Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential for evidence-based guidelines but are often limited by the time-consuming nature of literature screening.<n>We propose and evaluate an in-house system based on Large Language Models (LLMs) for automating both title/abstract and full-text screening.
• Score: 1.921297555859566
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential for evidence-based guidelines but are often limited by the time-consuming nature of literature screening. We propose and evaluate an in-house system based on Large Language Models (LLMs) for automating both title/abstract and full-text screening, addressing a critical gap in the literature. Using a completed SR on Vitamin D and falls (14,439 articles), the LLM-based system employed prompt engineering for title/abstract screening and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for full-text screening. The system achieved an article exclusion rate (AER) of 99.5%, specificity of 99.6%, a false negative rate (FNR) of 0%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. After screening, only 78 articles required manual review, including all 20 identified by traditional methods, reducing manual screening time by 95.5%. For comparison, Rayyan, a commercial tool for title/abstract screening, achieved an AER of 72.1% and FNR of 5% when including articles Rayyan considered as undecided or likely to include. Lowering Rayyan's inclusion thresholds improved FNR to 0% but increased screening time. By addressing both screening phases, the LLM-based system significantly outperformed Rayyan and traditional methods, reducing total screening time to 25.5 hours while maintaining high accuracy. These findings highlight the transformative potential of LLMs in SR workflows by offering a scalable, efficient, and accurate solution, particularly for the full-text screening phase, which has lacked automation tools.

Related papers

• When retrieval outperforms generation: Dense evidence retrieval for scalable fake news detection [1.329253775274691]
  DeReC is a lightweight framework that demonstrates how general-purpose text embeddings can effectively replace autoregressive LLM-based approaches in fact verification tasks.<n>By combining dense retrieval with specialized classification, our system achieves better accuracy while being significantly more efficient.<n>Our results demonstrate that carefully engineered retrieval-based systems can match or exceed LLM performance in specialized tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T18:35:45Z)
• Rethinking LLM Evaluation: Can We Evaluate LLMs with 200x Less Data? [82.09573568241724]
  EssenceBench is a coarse-to-fine framework utilizing an iterative Genetic Algorithm (GA)<n>Our approach yields superior compression results with lower reconstruction error and markedly higher efficiency.<n>On the HellaSwag benchmark (10K samples), our method preserves the ranking of all models shifting within 5% using 25x fewer samples, and achieves 95% ranking preservation shifting within 5% using only 200x fewer samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T05:38:10Z)
• Grounding Large Language Models in Clinical Evidence: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for Querying UK NICE Clinical Guidelines [1.9615061725959186]
  This paper presents the development and evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation system for querying the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The system's retrieval architecture, composed of a hybrid embedding mechanism, was evaluated against a database of 10,195 text chunks derived from three hundred guidelines.<n>It demonstrates high performance, with a Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) of 0.814, a Recall of 81% at the first chunk and of 99.1% within the top ten retrieved chunks, when evaluated on 7901 queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T12:57:13Z)
• An Auditable Pipeline for Fuzzy Full-Text Screening in Systematic Reviews: Integrating Contrastive Semantic Highlighting and LLM Judgment [0.0]
  Full-text screening is the major bottleneck of systematic reviews.<n>We present a scalable, auditable pipeline that reframes inclusion/exclusion as a fuzzy decision problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T17:41:50Z)
• LGAR: Zero-Shot LLM-Guided Neural Ranking for Abstract Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews [0.9314555897827079]
  Systematic literature reviews aim to identify and evaluate all relevant papers on a topic.<n>To date, abstract screening methods using large language models (LLMs) focus on binary classification settings.<n>We propose LGAR, a zero-shot LLM Guided Abstract Ranker composed of an LLM based graded relevance scorer and a dense re-ranker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T16:18:50Z)
• A Large-Scale Study of Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models: An Initial Look [52.114284476700874]
  This paper reports on the results of a large-scale evaluation (the TREC 2024 RAG Track) where four different relevance assessment approaches were deployed. We find that automatically generated UMBRELA judgments can replace fully manual judgments to accurately capture run-level effectiveness. Surprisingly, we find that LLM assistance does not appear to increase correlation with fully manual assessments, suggesting that costs associated with human-in-the-loop processes do not bring obvious tangible benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T01:12:35Z)
• ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systems [2.8692611791027893]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems generate inaccurate responses due to the retrieval of irrelevant or loosely related information. We propose ChunkRAG, a framework that enhances RAG systems by evaluating and filtering retrieved information at the chunk level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T14:07:53Z)
• The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic review [42.112100361891905]
  This study aims to summarize the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the process of creating a scientific review. We look at the range of stages in a review that can be automated and assess the current state-of-the-art research projects in the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T20:12:57Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Speculative RAG: Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation through Drafting [68.90949377014742]
  Speculative RAG is a framework that leverages a larger generalist LM to efficiently verify multiple RAG drafts produced in parallel by a smaller, distilled specialist LM. Our method accelerates RAG by delegating drafting to the smaller specialist LM, with the larger generalist LM performing a single verification pass over the drafts. It notably enhances accuracy by up to 12.97% while reducing latency by 51% compared to conventional RAG systems on PubHealth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T06:50:19Z)
• Development and Testing of Retrieval Augmented Generation in Large Language Models -- A Case Study Report [2.523433459887027]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) emerges as a promising approach for customizing domain knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs) We developed an LLM-RAG model using 35 preoperative guidelines and tested it against human-generated responses. The model generated answers within an average of 15-20 seconds, significantly faster than the 10 minutes typically required by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T06:49:53Z)
• Zero-shot Generative Large Language Models for Systematic Review Screening Automation [55.403958106416574]
  This study investigates the effectiveness of using zero-shot large language models for automatic screening. We evaluate the effectiveness of eight different LLMs and investigate a calibration technique that uses a predefined recall threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T01:54:08Z)
• Adaptation with Self-Evaluation to Improve Selective Prediction in LLMs [56.526095828316386]
  We propose a novel framework for adaptation with self-evaluation to improve the selective prediction performance of large language models (LLMs) We evaluate our method on a variety of question-answering (QA) datasets and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art selective prediction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T03:34:59Z)
• PATCorrect: Non-autoregressive Phoneme-augmented Transformer for ASR Error Correction [0.9502148118198473]
  We propose PATCorrect, a novel non-autoregressive (NAR) approach to reduce word error rate (WER) We demonstrate that PATCorrect consistently outperforms state-of-the-art NAR method on English corpus across different upstream ASR systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T04:05:24Z)
• Exploiting prompt learning with pre-trained language models for Alzheimer's Disease detection [70.86672569101536]
  Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial in facilitating preventive care and to delay further progression. This paper investigates the use of prompt-based fine-tuning of PLMs that consistently uses AD classification errors as the training objective function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-29T09:18:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.