Revisiting MLLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of Image Classification Abilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16418v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 00:46:56 GMT
• Title: Revisiting MLLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of Image Classification Abilities
• Authors: Huan Liu, Lingyu Xiao, Jiangjiang Liu, Xiaofan Li, Ze Feng, Sen Yang, Jingdong Wang,
• Abstract summary: This paper thoroughly revisits the Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with an in-depth analysis of image classification. Our findings reveal that the most recent MLLMs can match or even outperform CLIP-style vision-language models on several datasets.
• Score: 31.293869275511412
• License:
• Abstract: With the rapid advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a variety of benchmarks have been introduced to evaluate their capabilities. While most evaluations have focused on complex tasks such as scientific comprehension and visual reasoning, little attention has been given to assessing their fundamental image classification abilities. In this paper, we address this gap by thoroughly revisiting the MLLMs with an in-depth analysis of image classification. Specifically, building on established datasets, we examine a broad spectrum of scenarios, from general classification tasks (e.g., ImageNet, ObjectNet) to more fine-grained categories such as bird and food classification. Our findings reveal that the most recent MLLMs can match or even outperform CLIP-style vision-language models on several datasets, challenging the previous assumption that MLLMs are bad at image classification \cite{VLMClassifier}. To understand the factors driving this improvement, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the network architecture, data selection, and training recipe used in public MLLMs. Our results attribute this success to advancements in language models and the diversity of training data sources. Based on these observations, we further analyze and attribute the potential reasons to conceptual knowledge transfer and enhanced exposure of target concepts, respectively. We hope our findings will offer valuable insights for future research on MLLMs and their evaluation in image classification tasks.

Related papers

• Analyzing and Boosting the Power of Fine-Grained Visual Recognition for Multi-modal Large Language Models [31.34575955517015]
  Finedefics is an MLLM that enhances the model's FGVR capability by incorporating informative attribute descriptions of objects into the training phase. We employ contrastive learning on object-attribute pairs and attribute-category pairs simultaneously and use examples from similar but incorrect categories as hard negatives. Extensive evaluations across multiple popular FGVR datasets demonstrate that Finedefics outperforms existing MLLMs of comparable parameter sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T08:52:43Z)
• MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [97.94579295913606]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered increased attention from both industry and academia. In the development process, evaluation is critical since it provides intuitive feedback and guidance on improving models. This work aims to offer researchers an easy grasp of how to effectively evaluate MLLMs according to different needs and to inspire better evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T18:59:54Z)
• Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
  This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z)
• Visualization Literacy of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comparative Study [12.367399155606162]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine the inherent power of large language models (LLMs) with the renewed capabilities to reason about the multimodal context. Many recent works in visualization have demonstrated MLLMs' capability to understand and interpret visualization results and explain the content of the visualization to users in natural language. In this work, we aim to fill the gap by utilizing the concept of visualization literacy to evaluate MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:52:16Z)
• Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification? [39.76294811955341]
  We revisit the image classification task using visually-grounded language models (VLMs) such as GPT-4V and LLaVA. We find that existing proprietary and public VLMs significantly underperform CLIP on standard image classification benchmarks like ImageNet. Our analysis reveals that the primary cause is data-related: critical information for image classification is encoded in the VLM's latent space but can only be effectively decoded with enough training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T17:57:06Z)
• RAR: Retrieving And Ranking Augmented MLLMs for Visual Recognition [78.97487780589574]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at classifying fine-grained categories. This paper introduces a Retrieving And Ranking augmented method for MLLMs. Our proposed approach not only addresses the inherent limitations in fine-grained recognition but also preserves the model's comprehensive knowledge base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:59:55Z)
• Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions [11.786387517781328]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are advanced models that can tackle more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs. We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:57:34Z)
• Q-Bench+: A Benchmark for Multi-modal Foundation Models on Low-level Vision from Single Images to Pairs [71.07108539262721]
  We design benchmark settings to emulate human language responses related to low-level vision. We extend the low-level perception-related question-answering and description evaluations of MLLMs from single images to image pairs. We demonstrate that several MLLMs have decent low-level visual competencies on single images, but only GPT-4V exhibits higher accuracy on pairwise comparisons than humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-11T06:44:11Z)
• Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning over Image Sequences [80.54979242912944]
  This paper introduces Mementos, a new benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' sequential image reasoning abilities. We find that MLLMs struggle to accurately describe dynamic information about given image sequences, often leading to hallucinations/misrepresentations of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T07:10:13Z)
• CLAMP: Contrastive LAnguage Model Prompt-tuning [89.96914454453791]
  We show that large language models can achieve good image classification performance when adapted this way. Our approach beats state-of-the-art mLLMs by 13% and slightly outperforms contrastive learning with a custom text model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T05:13:59Z)
• Q-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Foundation Models on Low-level Vision [85.6008224440157]
  Multi-modality Large Language Models (MLLMs) have catalyzed a shift in computer vision from specialized models to general-purpose foundation models. We present Q-Bench, a holistic benchmark crafted to evaluate potential abilities of MLLMs on three realms: low-level visual perception, low-level visual description, and overall visual quality assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T14:43:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.