A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16641v4
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:03:45 GMT
• Title: A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness
• Authors: Chris Lam,
• Abstract summary: Systems thinking provides us with a way to model the algorithmic fairness problem.<n>We can then encode prior knowledge and assumptions about where we believe bias might exist in the data generating process.<n>We can use systems thinking to help policymakers on both sides of the political aisle to understand the complex trade-offs that exist from different types of fairness policies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Systems thinking provides us with a way to model the algorithmic fairness problem by allowing us to encode prior knowledge and assumptions about where we believe bias might exist in the data generating process. We can then encode these beliefs as a series of causal graphs, enabling us to link AI/ML systems to politics and the law. This allows us to combine techniques from machine learning, causal inference, and system dynamics in order to capture different emergent aspects of the fairness problem. We can use systems thinking to help policymakers on both sides of the political aisle to understand the complex trade-offs that exist from different types of fairness policies, providing a sociotechnical foundation for designing AI policy that is aligned to their political agendas and with society's values.

Related papers

• Measuring Political Preferences in AI Systems: An Integrative Approach [0.0]
  This study employs a multi-method approach to assess political bias in leading AI systems. Results indicate a consistent left-leaning bias across most contemporary AI systems. The presence of systematic political bias in AI systems poses risks, including reduced viewpoint diversity, increased societal polarization, and the potential for public mistrust in AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T01:40:28Z)
• Political Neutrality in AI is Impossible- But Here is How to Approximate it [97.59456676216115]
  We argue that true political neutrality is neither feasible nor universally desirable due to its subjective nature and the biases inherent in AI training data, algorithms, and user interactions. We use the term "approximation" of political neutrality to shift the focus from unattainable absolutes to achievable, practical proxies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T16:48:04Z)
• Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science [159.95299889946637]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks.<n>Political-LLM aims to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:50Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey [70.35693485015659]
  AI alignment aims to make AI systems behave in line with human intentions and values. We identify four principles as the key objectives of AI alignment: Robustness, Interpretability, Controllability, and Ethicality. We decompose current alignment research into two key components: forward alignment and backward alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T15:52:15Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
  This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks. We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness [16.184328505946763]
  Algorithmic fairness has been framed as a newly emerging technology that mitigates systemic discrimination in automated decision-making. We argue that fairness is an inherently social concept and that technologies for algorithmic fairness should therefore be approached through a sociotechnical lens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T21:17:16Z)
• Fair Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Information Networks [35.80367469624887]
  We propose a comprehensive set of de-biasing methods for fair HINs representation learning. We study the behavior of these algorithms, especially their capability in balancing the trade-off between fairness and prediction accuracy. We evaluate the performance of the proposed methods in an automated career counseling application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T08:28:18Z)
• Fairness On The Ground: Applying Algorithmic Fairness Approaches to Production Systems [4.288137349392433]
  This paper presents an example of applying algorithmic fairness approaches to complex production systems within the context of a large technology company. We discuss how we disentangle normative questions of product and policy design from empirical questions of system implementation. We also present an approach for answering questions of the latter sort, which allows us to measure how machine learning systems and human labelers are making these tradeoffs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T16:42:20Z)
• Data, Power and Bias in Artificial Intelligence [5.124256074746721]
  Artificial Intelligence has the potential to exacerbate societal bias and set back decades of advances in equal rights and civil liberty. Data used to train machine learning algorithms may capture social injustices, inequality or discriminatory attitudes that may be learned and perpetuated in society. This paper reviews ongoing work to ensure data justice, fairness and bias mitigation in AI systems from different domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T16:17:40Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)
• Getting Fairness Right: Towards a Toolbox for Practitioners [2.4364387374267427]
  The potential risk of AI systems unintentionally embedding and reproducing bias has attracted the attention of machine learning practitioners and society at large. This paper proposes to draft a toolbox which helps practitioners to ensure fair AI practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-15T20:53:50Z)
• Learning from Learning Machines: Optimisation, Rules, and Social Norms [91.3755431537592]
  It appears that the area of AI that is most analogous to the behaviour of economic entities is that of morally good decision-making. Recent successes of deep learning for AI suggest that more implicit specifications work better than explicit ones for solving such problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T17:42:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.