Modular Conversational Agents for Surveys and Interviews

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17049v2
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 02:14:35 GMT
• Title: Modular Conversational Agents for Surveys and Interviews
• Authors: Jiangbo Yu, Jinhua Zhao, Luis Miranda-Moreno, Matthew Korp,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a modular approach and its resulting parameterized process for designing AI agents.<n>We demonstrate the adaptability, generalizability, and efficacy of our modular approach through three empirical studies.<n>The results suggest that the AI agent increases completion rates and response quality.
• Score: 6.019313905775819
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Surveys and interviews are widely used for collecting insights on emerging or hypothetical scenarios. Traditional human-led methods often face challenges related to cost, scalability, and consistency. Recently, various domains have begun to explore the use of conversational agents (chatbots) powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. However, considering decisions in transportation investments and policies often carry significant public and environmental stakes, surveys and interviews face unique challenges in integrating AI agents, underscoring the need for a rigorous, resource-efficient approach that enhances participant engagement and ensures privacy. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a modular approach and its resulting parameterized process for designing AI agents. We detail the system architecture, integrating engineered prompts, specialized knowledge bases, and customizable, goal-oriented conversational logic. We demonstrate the adaptability, generalizability, and efficacy of our modular approach through three empirical studies: (1) travel preference surveys, highlighting conditional logic and multimodal (voice, text, and image generation) capabilities; (2) public opinion elicitation on a newly constructed, novel infrastructure project, showcasing question customization and multilingual (English and French) capabilities; and (3) expert consultation about the impact of technologies on future transportation systems, highlighting real-time, clarification request capabilities for open-ended questions, resilience in handling erratic inputs, and efficient transcript postprocessing. The results suggest that the AI agent increases completion rates and response quality. Furthermore, the modular approach demonstrates controllability, flexibility, and robustness while addressing key ethical, privacy, security, and token consumption concerns.

Related papers

• A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions [51.96890647837277]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have propelled conversational AI from traditional dialogue systems into sophisticated agents capable of autonomous actions, contextual awareness, and multi-turn interactions with users. This survey paper presents a desideratum for next-generation Conversational Agents - what has been achieved, what challenges persist, and what must be done for more scalable systems that approach human-level intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T21:01:25Z)
• Toward Agentic AI: Generative Information Retrieval Inspired Intelligent Communications and Networking [87.82985288731489]
  Agentic AI has emerged as a key paradigm for intelligent communications and networking. This article emphasizes the role of knowledge acquisition, processing, and retrieval in agentic AI for telecom systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T06:02:25Z)
• Challenges in Human-Agent Communication [55.53932430345333]
  We identify and analyze twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose. These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication. Our findings serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T01:21:26Z)
• Towards Human-Level Understanding of Complex Process Engineering Schematics: A Pedagogical, Introspective Multi-Agent Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [0.0]
  In the chemical and process industries, Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs) and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) are critical for design, construction, and maintenance. Recent advancements in Generative AI have shown promise in understanding and interpreting process diagrams for Visual Question Answering (VQA) We propose a secure, on-premises enterprise solution using a hierarchical, multi-agent Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T19:34:04Z)
• Position: Foundation Agents as the Paradigm Shift for Decision Making [24.555816843983003]
  We advocate for the construction of foundation agents as a transformative shift in the learning paradigm of agents. We specify the roadmap of foundation agents from large interactive data collection or generation to self-supervised pretraining and adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T09:54:50Z)
• A Survey on Recent Advances in Conversational Data Generation [14.237954885530396]
  We offer a systematic and comprehensive review of multi-turn conversational data generation. We focus on three types of dialogue systems: open domain, task-oriented, and information-seeking. We examine the evaluation metrics and methods for assessing synthetic conversational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T10:11:12Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models [87.46256176508376]
  We introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process. We evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T14:36:23Z)
• 'What are you referring to?' Evaluating the Ability of Multi-Modal Dialogue Models to Process Clarificational Exchanges [65.03196674816772]
  Referential ambiguities arise in dialogue when a referring expression does not uniquely identify the intended referent for the addressee. Addressees usually detect such ambiguities immediately and work with the speaker to repair it using meta-communicative, Clarification Exchanges (CE): a Clarification Request (CR) and a response. Here, we argue that the ability to generate and respond to CRs imposes specific constraints on the architecture and objective functions of multi-modal, visually grounded dialogue models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T13:44:33Z)
• Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook [151.49434496615427]
  Vision systems to see and reason about the compositional nature of visual scenes are fundamental to understanding our world. The models learned to bridge the gap between such modalities coupled with large-scale training data facilitate contextual reasoning, generalization, and prompt capabilities at test time. The output of such models can be modified through human-provided prompts without retraining, e.g., segmenting a particular object by providing a bounding box, having interactive dialogues by asking questions about an image or video scene or manipulating the robot's behavior through language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:59:18Z)
• Requirements for Explainability and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Collaborative Work [0.0]
  The present structured literature analysis examines the requirements for the explainability and acceptance of AI. Results indicate that the two main groups of users are developers who require information about the internal operations of the model. The acceptance of AI systems depends on information about the system's functions and performance, privacy and ethical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T11:36:07Z)
• A Study of Situational Reasoning for Traffic Understanding [63.45021731775964]
  We devise three novel text-based tasks for situational reasoning in the traffic domain. We adopt four knowledge-enhanced methods that have shown generalization capability across language reasoning tasks in prior work. We provide in-depth analyses of model performance on data partitions and examine model predictions categorically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T01:01:12Z)
• Using Textual Interface to Align External Knowledge for End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems [53.38517204698343]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a textual interface to align external knowledge and eliminate redundant processes. We demonstrate our paradigm in practice through MultiWOZ-Remake, including an interactive textual interface built for the MultiWOZ database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T05:48:21Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Foundation Models for Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities [124.79381732197649]
  Foundation models pretrained on diverse data at scale have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in a wide range of vision and language tasks. New paradigms are emerging for training foundation models to interact with other agents and perform long-term reasoning. Research at the intersection of foundation models and decision making holds tremendous promise for creating powerful new systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:44:07Z)
• Taxonomy of Abstractive Dialogue Summarization: Scenarios, Approaches and Future Directions [14.85592662663867]
  This survey provides a comprehensive investigation on existing work for abstractive dialogue summarization from scenarios. It categorizes the task into two broad categories according to the type of input dialogues, i.e., open-domain and task-oriented. It presents a taxonomy of existing techniques in three directions, namely, injecting dialogue features, designing auxiliary training tasks and using additional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T14:33:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.