Contrastive Representation for Interactive Recommendation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18396v2
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 03:44:41 GMT
- Title: Contrastive Representation for Interactive Recommendation
- Authors: Jingyu Li, Zhiyong Feng, Dongxiao He, Hongqi Chen, Qinghang Gao, Guoli Wu,
- Abstract summary: We propose Contrastive Representation for Interactive Recommendation (CRIR)
CRIR efficiently extracts latent, high-level preference ranking features from explicit interaction.
We also propose a data exploiting mechanism and an agent training mechanism to better adapt CRIR to the Deep Reinforcement Learning backbone.
- Score: 20.020630759453237
- License:
- Abstract: Interactive Recommendation (IR) has gained significant attention recently for its capability to quickly capture dynamic interest and optimize both short and long term objectives. IR agents are typically implemented through Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), because DRL is inherently compatible with the dynamic nature of IR. However, DRL is currently not perfect for IR. Due to the large action space and sample inefficiency problem, training DRL recommender agents is challenging. The key point is that useful features cannot be extracted as high-quality representations for the recommender agent to optimize its policy. To tackle this problem, we propose Contrastive Representation for Interactive Recommendation (CRIR). CRIR efficiently extracts latent, high-level preference ranking features from explicit interaction, and leverages the features to enhance users' representation. Specifically, the CRIR provides representation through one representation network, and refines it through our proposed Preference Ranking Contrastive Learning (PRCL). The key insight of PRCL is that it can perform contrastive learning without relying on computations involving high-level representations or large potential action sets. Furthermore, we also propose a data exploiting mechanism and an agent training mechanism to better adapt CRIR to the DRL backbone. Extensive experiments have been carried out to show our method's superior improvement on the sample efficiency while training an DRL-based IR agent.
Related papers
- DEAR: Disentangled Environment and Agent Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstruction [4.813546138483559]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms can learn robotic control tasks from visual observations, but they often require a large amount of data.
In this paper, we explore how the agent's knowledge of its shape can improve the sample efficiency of visual RL methods.
We propose a novel method, Disentangled Environment and Agent Representations, that uses the segmentation mask of the agent as supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-30T09:15:21Z) - LIRE: listwise reward enhancement for preference alignment [27.50204023448716]
We propose a gradient-based reward optimization approach that incorporates the offline rewards of multiple responses into a streamlined listwise framework.
LIRE is straightforward to implement, requiring minimal parameter tuning, and seamlessly aligns with the pairwise paradigm.
Our experiments demonstrate that LIRE consistently outperforms existing methods across several benchmarks on dialogue and summarization tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T10:21:50Z) - Model-enhanced Contrastive Reinforcement Learning for Sequential
Recommendation [28.218427886174506]
We propose a novel RL recommender named model-enhanced contrastive reinforcement learning (MCRL)
On the one hand, we learn a value function to estimate the long-term engagement of users, together with a conservative value learning mechanism to alleviate the overestimation problem.
Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms existing offline RL and self-supervised RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T11:43:29Z) - Robust Reinforcement Learning Objectives for Sequential Recommender Systems [7.44049827436013]
We develop recommender systems that incorporate direct user feedback in the form of rewards, enhancing personalization for users.
employing RL algorithms presents challenges, including off-policy training, expansive action spaces, and the scarcity of datasets with sufficient reward signals.
We introduce an enhanced methodology aimed at providing a more effective solution to these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T08:09:08Z) - Prompt-Tuning Decision Transformer with Preference Ranking [83.76329715043205]
We propose the Prompt-Tuning DT algorithm to address challenges by using trajectory segments as prompts to guide RL agents in acquiring environmental information.
Our approach involves randomly sampling a Gaussian distribution to fine-tune the elements of the prompt trajectory and using preference ranking function to find the optimization direction.
Our work contributes to the advancement of prompt-tuning approaches in RL, providing a promising direction for optimizing large RL agents for specific preference tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T17:49:04Z) - RACCER: Towards Reachable and Certain Counterfactual Explanations for
Reinforcement Learning [2.0341936392563063]
We propose RACCER, the first-specific approach to generating counterfactual explanations for the behavior of RL agents.
We use a tree search to find the most suitable counterfactuals based on the defined properties.
We evaluate RACCER in two tasks as well as conduct a user study to show that RL-specific counterfactuals help users better understand agents' behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T09:47:00Z) - Basis for Intentions: Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning using
Past Experience [89.30876995059168]
inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
This paper addresses the problem of IRL -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-09T17:29:49Z) - Modeling Bounded Rationality in Multi-Agent Simulations Using Rationally
Inattentive Reinforcement Learning [85.86440477005523]
We study more human-like RL agents which incorporate an established model of human-irrationality, the Rational Inattention (RI) model.
RIRL models the cost of cognitive information processing using mutual information.
We show that using RIRL yields a rich spectrum of new equilibrium behaviors that differ from those found under rational assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-18T20:54:00Z) - PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via
Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning.
We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z) - Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based
Deep Reinforcement Learning [56.17667147101263]
In real-world tasks, reinforcement learning agents encounter situations that are not present during training time.
To ensure reliable performance, the RL agents need to exhibit robustness against worst-case situations.
We propose the Robust Hallucinated Upper-Confidence RL (RH-UCRL) algorithm to provably solve this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T16:50:17Z) - Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systems [77.38665506495553]
We propose self-supervised reinforcement learning for sequential recommendation tasks.
Our approach augments standard recommendation models with two output layers: one for self-supervised learning and the other for RL.
Based on such an approach, we propose two frameworks namely Self-Supervised Q-learning(SQN) and Self-Supervised Actor-Critic(SAC)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T11:18:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.