Comparing analytic and data-driven approaches to parameter identifiability: A power systems case study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18663v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 19:33:12 GMT
• Title: Comparing analytic and data-driven approaches to parameter identifiability: A power systems case study
• Authors: Nikolaos Evangelou, Alexander M. Stankovic, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Mark K. Transtrum,
• Abstract summary: We report on a study comparing and contrasting analytical and data-driven approaches to quantify parameter identifiability. We use the infinite bus synchronous generator model, a well-understood model from the power systems domain, as our benchmark problem. We compare these results to those arrived at through data-driven manifold learning schemes: Output Diffusion - Maps and Geometric Harmonics.
• Score: 41.94295877935867
• License:
• Abstract: Parameter identifiability refers to the capability of accurately inferring the parameter values of a model from its observations (data). Traditional analysis methods exploit analytical properties of the closed form model, in particular sensitivity analysis, to quantify the response of the model predictions to variations in parameters. Techniques developed to analyze data, specifically manifold learning methods, have the potential to complement, and even extend the scope of the traditional analytical approaches. We report on a study comparing and contrasting analytical and data-driven approaches to quantify parameter identifiability and, importantly, perform parameter reduction tasks. We use the infinite bus synchronous generator model, a well-understood model from the power systems domain, as our benchmark problem. Our traditional analysis methods use the Fisher Information Matrix to quantify parameter identifiability analysis, and the Manifold Boundary Approximation Method to perform parameter reduction. We compare these results to those arrived at through data-driven manifold learning schemes: Output - Diffusion Maps and Geometric Harmonics. For our test case, we find that the two suites of tools (analytical when a model is explicitly available, as well as data-driven when the model is lacking and only measurement data are available) give (correct) comparable results; these results are also in agreement with traditional analysis based on singular perturbation theory. We then discuss the prospects of using data-driven methods for such model analysis.

Related papers

• Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settings [53.17563688225137]
  Simulation-based inference ( SBI) is capable of approximating the posterior distribution that relates input parameters to a given observation. In this work, we consider a tall data extension in which multiple observations are available to better infer the parameters of the model. We compare our method to recently proposed competing approaches on various numerical experiments and demonstrate its superiority in terms of numerical stability and computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:23:36Z)
• Using causal inference to avoid fallouts in data-driven parametric analysis: a case study in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry [0.7566148383213173]
  The decision-making process in real-world implementations has been affected by a growing reliance on data-driven models. We investigated the synergetic pattern between the data-driven methods, empirical domain knowledge, and first-principles simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T13:54:58Z)
• Beyond Convergence: Identifiability of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models [0.0]
  We investigate the notion of model parameter identifiability through a case study focused on parameter estimation from motion sensor data. We employ a deep neural network to estimate subject-wise parameters, including mass, stiffness, and equilibrium leg length. The results show that while certain parameters can be identified from the observation data, others remain unidentifiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T03:40:53Z)
• On the Influence of Enforcing Model Identifiability on Learning dynamics of Gaussian Mixture Models [14.759688428864159]
  We propose a technique for extracting submodels from singular models. Our method enforces model identifiability during training. We show how the method can be applied to more complex models like deep neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T07:50:22Z)
• Mixed Effects Neural ODE: A Variational Approximation for Analyzing the Dynamics of Panel Data [50.23363975709122]
  We propose a probabilistic model called ME-NODE to incorporate (fixed + random) mixed effects for analyzing panel data. We show that our model can be derived using smooth approximations of SDEs provided by the Wong-Zakai theorem. We then derive Evidence Based Lower Bounds for ME-NODE, and develop (efficient) training algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T22:41:51Z)
• Nonparametric Functional Analysis of Generalized Linear Models Under Nonlinear Constraints [0.0]
  This article introduces a novel nonparametric methodology for Generalized Linear Models. It combines the strengths of the binary regression and latent variable formulations for categorical data. It extends recently published parametric versions of the methodology and generalizes it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T04:49:59Z)
• MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
  Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice. One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio. We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)
• Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
  Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method. A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations. We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)
• Predicting Multidimensional Data via Tensor Learning [0.0]
  We develop a model that retains the intrinsic multidimensional structure of the dataset. To estimate the model parameters, an Alternating Least Squares algorithm is developed. The proposed model is able to outperform benchmark models present in the forecasting literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T11:57:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.