SafeSynthDP: Leveraging Large Language Models for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation Using Differential Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20641v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:10:10 GMT
• Title: SafeSynthDP: Leveraging Large Language Models for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation Using Differential Privacy
• Authors: Md Mahadi Hasan Nahid, Sadid Bin Hasan,
• Abstract summary: We investigate capability of Large Language Models (Ms) to generate synthetic datasets with Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms. Our approach incorporates DP-based noise injection methods, including Laplace and Gaussian distributions, into the data generation process. We then evaluate the utility of these DP-enhanced synthetic datasets by comparing the performance of ML models trained on them against models trained on the original data.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Machine learning (ML) models frequently rely on training data that may include sensitive or personal information, raising substantial privacy concerns. Legislative frameworks such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) have necessitated the development of strategies that preserve privacy while maintaining the utility of data. In this paper, we investigate the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate synthetic datasets integrated with Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms, thereby enabling data-driven research and model training without direct exposure of sensitive information. Our approach incorporates DP-based noise injection methods, including Laplace and Gaussian distributions, into the data generation process. We then evaluate the utility of these DP-enhanced synthetic datasets by comparing the performance of ML models trained on them against models trained on the original data. To substantiate privacy guarantees, we assess the resilience of the generated synthetic data to membership inference attacks and related threats. The experimental results demonstrate that integrating DP within LLM-driven synthetic data generation offers a viable balance between privacy protection and data utility. This study provides a foundational methodology and insight into the privacy-preserving capabilities of LLMs, paving the way for compliant and effective ML research and applications.

Related papers

• Differentially Private Non Parametric Copulas: Generating synthetic data with non parametric copulas under privacy guarantees [0.0]
  This work focuses on enhancing a non-parametric co-pula-based synthetic data generation model, DPNPC, by incorporating Differential Privacy. We compare DPNPC with three other models (PrivBayes, DP-Copula, and DP-Histogram) across three public datasets, evaluating privacy, utility, and execution time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T10:18:14Z)
• Generated Data with Fake Privacy: Hidden Dangers of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Generated Data [18.984529269623135]
  This study investigates whether fine-tuning with generated data truly enhances privacy or introduces additional privacy risks. We use the Pythia Model Suite and Open Pre-trained Transformer to measure privacy risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T10:14:12Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Text anonymization is crucial for sharing sensitive data while maintaining privacy. Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of re-identification attack ability of Large Language Models. This paper proposes a framework composed of three LLM-based components -- a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• Mitigating the Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) via Pure Synthetic Data [51.41288763521186]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the outputs of language models by integrating relevant information retrieved from external knowledge sources. RAG systems may face severe privacy risks when retrieving private data. We propose using synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative for the retrieval data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T22:53:09Z)
• FewFedPIT: Towards Privacy-preserving and Few-shot Federated Instruction Tuning [54.26614091429253]
  Federated instruction tuning (FedIT) is a promising solution, by consolidating collaborative training across multiple data owners. FedIT encounters limitations such as scarcity of instructional data and risk of exposure to training data extraction attacks. We propose FewFedPIT, designed to simultaneously enhance privacy protection and model performance of federated few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T08:41:22Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Approximate, Adapt, Anonymize (3A): a Framework for Privacy Preserving Training Data Release for Machine Learning [3.29354893777827]
  We introduce a data release framework, 3A (Approximate, Adapt, Anonymize), to maximize data utility for machine learning. We present experimental evidence showing minimal discrepancy between performance metrics of models trained on real versus privatized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T18:37:11Z)
• Synthetic Text Generation with Differential Privacy: A Simple and Practical Recipe [32.63295550058343]
  We show that a simple and practical recipe in the text domain is effective in generating useful synthetic text with strong privacy protection. Our method produces synthetic text that is competitive in terms of utility with its non-private counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T21:21:17Z)
• Privacy-preserving Generative Framework Against Membership Inference Attacks [10.791983671720882]
  We design a privacy-preserving generative framework against membership inference attacks. We first map the source data to the latent space through the VAE model to get the latent code, then perform noise process satisfying metric privacy on the latent code, and finally use the VAE model to reconstruct the synthetic data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that the machine learning model trained with newly generated synthetic data can effectively resist membership inference attacks and still maintain high utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-11T06:13:30Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• Differentially Private Federated Learning with Laplacian Smoothing [72.85272874099644]
  Federated learning aims to protect data privacy by collaboratively learning a model without sharing private data among users. An adversary may still be able to infer the private training data by attacking the released model. Differential privacy provides a statistical protection against such attacks at the price of significantly degrading the accuracy or utility of the trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T04:28:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.