Aim High, Stay Private: Differentially Private Synthetic Data Enables Public Release of Behavioral Health Information with High Utility

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02971v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:58:34 GMT
• Title: Aim High, Stay Private: Differentially Private Synthetic Data Enables Public Release of Behavioral Health Information with High Utility
• Authors: Mohsen Ghasemizade, Juniper Lovato, Christopher M. Danforth, Peter Sheridan Dodds, Laura S. P. Bloomfield, Matthew Price, Team LEMURS, Joseph P. Near,
• Abstract summary: Differential Privacy (DP) provides formal guarantees against re-identification risks.<n>We generate DP synthetic data for Phase 1 of the Lived Experiences Measured Using Rings Study (LEMURS)<n>We evaluate the utility of the synthetic data using a framework informed by actual uses of the LEMURS dataset.
• Score: 2.1715431485081593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Sharing health and behavioral data raises significant privacy concerns, as conventional de-identification methods are susceptible to privacy attacks. Differential Privacy (DP) provides formal guarantees against re-identification risks, but practical implementation necessitates balancing privacy protection and the utility of data. We demonstrate the use of DP to protect individuals in a real behavioral health study, while making the data publicly available and retaining high utility for downstream users of the data. We use the Adaptive Iterative Mechanism (AIM) to generate DP synthetic data for Phase 1 of the Lived Experiences Measured Using Rings Study (LEMURS). The LEMURS dataset comprises physiological measurements from wearable devices (Oura rings) and self-reported survey data from first-year college students. We evaluate the synthetic datasets across a range of privacy budgets, epsilon = 1 to 100, focusing on the trade-off between privacy and utility. We evaluate the utility of the synthetic data using a framework informed by actual uses of the LEMURS dataset. Our evaluation identifies the trade-off between privacy and utility across synthetic datasets generated with different privacy budgets. We find that synthetic data sets with epsilon = 5 preserve adequate predictive utility while significantly mitigating privacy risks. Our methodology establishes a reproducible framework for evaluating the practical impacts of epsilon on generating private synthetic datasets with numerous attributes and records, contributing to informed decision-making in data sharing practices.

Related papers

• Improving Noise Efficiency in Privacy-preserving Dataset Distillation [59.57846442477106]
  We introduce a novel framework that decouples sampling from optimization for better convergence and improves signal quality.<n>On CIFAR-10, our method achieves a textbf10.0% improvement with 50 images per class and textbf8.3% increase with just textbfone-fifth the distilled set size of previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T13:15:52Z)
• PASS: Private Attributes Protection with Stochastic Data Substitution [46.38957234350463]
  Various studies have been proposed to protect private attributes by removing them from the data while maintaining the utilities of the data for downstream tasks.<n> PASS is designed to substitute the original sample with another one according to certain probabilities, which is trained with a novel loss function.<n>The comprehensive evaluation of PASS on various datasets of different modalities, including facial images, human activity sensory signals, and voice recording datasets, substantiates PASS's effectiveness and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T22:48:07Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• A Consensus Privacy Metrics Framework for Synthetic Data [13.972528788909813]
  There is no consolidated standard for measuring privacy in synthetic data.<n>Our findings indicate that current similarity metrics fail to measure identity disclosure.<n>For differentially private synthetic data, a privacy budget other than close to zero was not considered interpretable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T21:19:02Z)
• Contrastive Learning-Based privacy metrics in Tabular Synthetic Datasets [40.67424997797513]
  Synthetic data has garnered attention as a Privacy Enhancing Technology (PET) in sectors such as healthcare and finance.<n>Similarity-based methods aim at finding the level of similarity between training and synthetic data.<n>Attack-based methods conduce deliberate attacks on synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T15:52:23Z)
• SafeSynthDP: Leveraging Large Language Models for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation Using Differential Privacy [0.0]
  We investigate capability of Large Language Models (Ms) to generate synthetic datasets with Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms.<n>Our approach incorporates DP-based noise injection methods, including Laplace and Gaussian distributions, into the data generation process.<n>We then evaluate the utility of these DP-enhanced synthetic datasets by comparing the performance of ML models trained on them against models trained on the original data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T01:10:10Z)
• DP-CDA: An Algorithm for Enhanced Privacy Preservation in Dataset Synthesis Through Randomized Mixing [0.8739101659113155]
  We introduce an effective data publishing algorithm emphDP-CDA.<n>Our proposed algorithm generates synthetic datasets by randomly mixing data in a class-specific manner, and inducing carefully-tuned randomness to ensure privacy guarantees.<n>Our results indicate that synthetic datasets produced using the DP-CDA can achieve superior utility compared to those generated by traditional data publishing algorithms, even when subject to the same privacy requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T06:14:06Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Mitigating the Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) via Pure Synthetic Data [51.41288763521186]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the outputs of language models by integrating relevant information retrieved from external knowledge sources.<n>RAG systems may face severe privacy risks when retrieving private data.<n>We propose using synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative for the retrieval data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T22:53:09Z)
• Protect and Extend -- Using GANs for Synthetic Data Generation of Time-Series Medical Records [1.9749268648715583]
  This research compares state-of-the-art GAN-based models for synthetic data generation to generate time-series synthetic medical records of dementia patients. Our experiments indicate the superiority of the privacy-preserving GAN (PPGAN) model over other models regarding privacy preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T10:24:34Z)
• Scaling While Privacy Preserving: A Comprehensive Synthetic Tabular Data Generation and Evaluation in Learning Analytics [0.412484724941528]
  Privacy poses a significant obstacle to the progress of learning analytics (LA), presenting challenges like inadequate anonymization and data misuse. Synthetic data emerges as a potential remedy, offering robust privacy protection. Prior LA research on synthetic data lacks thorough evaluation, essential for assessing the delicate balance between privacy and data utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T20:27:55Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.