Enhancing Annotated Bibliography Generation with LLM Ensembles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20864v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:07:05 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Annotated Bibliography Generation with LLM Ensembles
• Authors: Sergio Bermejo,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Model ensembles are introduced and validated to enhance model performance in scholarly tasks. Results show a 38% improvement in annotation quality and a 51% reduction in content redundancy.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: This work proposes a novel approach to enhancing annotated bibliography generation through Large Language Model (LLM) ensembles. In particular, multiple LLMs in different roles -- controllable text generation, evaluation, and summarization -- are introduced and validated using a systematic methodology to enhance model performance in scholarly tasks. Output diversity among the ensemble that generates text is obtained using different LLM parameters, followed by an LLM acting as a judge to assess relevance, accuracy, and coherence. Responses selected by several combining strategies are then merged and refined through summarization and redundancy removal techniques. The preliminary experimental validation demonstrates that the combined outputs from the LLM ensemble improve coherence and relevance compared to individual responses, leading to a 38% improvement in annotation quality and a 51% reduction in content redundancy, thus highlighting the potential for automating complex scholarly tasks while maintaining high-quality standards.

Related papers

• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse. Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration. To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• PEDAL: Enhancing Greedy Decoding with Large Language Models using Diverse Exemplars [1.450405446885067]
  Self-ensembling techniques with diverse reasoning paths have demonstrated remarkable performance gains in text generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce PEDAL, a hybrid self-ensembling approach that combines the strengths of diverse exemplar based prompts and LLM based aggregation to achieve improvement in overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:54:09Z)
• Leveraging the Power of LLMs: A Fine-Tuning Approach for High-Quality Aspect-Based Summarization [25.052557735932535]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the potential to revolutionize diverse tasks within natural language processing. This paper explores the potential of fine-tuning LLMs for the aspect-based summarization task. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning open-source foundation LLMs, including Llama2, Mistral, Gemma and Aya, on a publicly available domain-specific aspect based summary dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T16:00:21Z)
• CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
  In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance. In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z)
• Ensemble Learning for Heterogeneous Large Language Models with Deep Parallel Collaboration [39.35476224845088]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit complementary strengths in various tasks, motivating the research of LLM ensembling. We propose a training-free ensemble framework DeePEn, fusing the informative probability distributions yielded by different LLMs at each decoding step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T08:52:22Z)
• Bridging the Gap between Different Vocabularies for LLM Ensemble [10.669552498083709]
  vocabulary discrepancies among various large language models (LLMs) have constrained previous studies. We propose a novel method to Ensemble LLMs via Vocabulary Alignment (EVA) EVA bridges the lexical gap among various LLMs, enabling meticulous ensemble at each generation step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T06:28:20Z)
• Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization [132.25202059478065]
  We benchmark large language models (LLMs) on instruction controllable text summarization. Our study reveals that instruction controllable text summarization remains a challenging task for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T18:25:26Z)
• BLESS: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Sentence Simplification [55.461555829492866]
  We present BLESS, a performance benchmark of the most recent state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on the task of text simplification (TS) We assess a total of 44 models, differing in size, architecture, pre-training methods, and accessibility, on three test sets from different domains (Wikipedia, news, and medical) under a few-shot setting. Our evaluation indicates that the best LLMs, despite not being trained on TS, perform comparably with state-of-the-art TS baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T12:18:17Z)
• Controllable Multi-document Summarization: Coverage & Coherence Intuitive Policy with Large Language Model Based Rewards [42.171703872560286]
  Controllability is a matter of concern when it comes to text generation tasks with long inputs, such as multi-document summarization. We train a controllable content extraction scheme to extract the text that will be refined by an LLM. Our approach yields competitive results in the evaluation using ROUGE metrics and outperforms potential baselines in coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T11:29:09Z)
• Summarization is (Almost) Dead [49.360752383801305]
  We develop new datasets and conduct human evaluation experiments to evaluate the zero-shot generation capability of large language models (LLMs) Our findings indicate a clear preference among human evaluators for LLM-generated summaries over human-written summaries and summaries generated by fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T08:13:01Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.