DeepLL: Considering Linear Logic for the Analysis of Deep Learning Experiments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00169v1
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 22:38:56 GMT
- Title: DeepLL: Considering Linear Logic for the Analysis of Deep Learning Experiments
- Authors: Nick Papoulias,
- Abstract summary: In this work we investigate the use of Linear Logic for the analysis of Deep Learning experiments.
We show that primitives and operators of Linear Logic can be used to express: (i) an abstract representation of the control flow of an experiment, (ii) a set of available experimental resources, such as API calls to the underlying data-structures and hardware as well as (iii) reasoning rules about the correct consumption of resources during experiments.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Deep Learning experiments have critical requirements regarding the careful handling of their datasets as well as the efficient and correct usage of APIs that interact with hardware accelerators. On the one hand, software mistakes during data handling can contaminate experiments and lead to incorrect results. On the other hand, poorly coded APIs that interact with the hardware can lead to sub-optimal usage and untrustworthy conclusions. In this work we investigate the use of Linear Logic for the analysis of Deep Learning experiments. We show that primitives and operators of Linear Logic can be used to express: (i) an abstract representation of the control flow of an experiment, (ii) a set of available experimental resources, such as API calls to the underlying data-structures and hardware as well as (iii) reasoning rules about the correct consumption of resources during experiments. Our proposed model is not only lightweight but also easy to comprehend having both a symbolic and a visual component. Finally, its artifacts are themselves proofs in Linear Logic that can be readily verified by off-the-shelf reasoners.
Related papers
- JustLogic: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Deductive Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.99046112135311]
We introduce JustLogic, a synthetically generated deductive reasoning benchmark for rigorous evaluation of Large Language Models.
JustLogic is highly complex, capable of generating a diverse range of linguistic patterns, vocabulary, and argument structures.
Our experimental results reveal that most state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs perform significantly worse than the human average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T15:49:10Z) - Enhancing In-Context Learning Performance with just SVD-Based Weight Pruning: A Theoretical Perspective [21.361946399192195]
In this paper, we show an exciting phenomenon that SVD-based weight pruning can enhance ICL performance.
We propose a simple, model-compression and derivative-free algorithm for downstream tasks in enhancing ICL inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T06:15:35Z) - Multi-modal Causal Structure Learning and Root Cause Analysis [67.67578590390907]
We propose Mulan, a unified multi-modal causal structure learning method for root cause localization.
We leverage a log-tailored language model to facilitate log representation learning, converting log sequences into time-series data.
We also introduce a novel key performance indicator-aware attention mechanism for assessing modality reliability and co-learning a final causal graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T05:50:38Z) - Comparing Differentiable Logics for Learning Systems: A Research Preview [0.0]
Research on formal verification of machine learning (ML) systems indicates that learning from data alone often fails to capture underlying background knowledge.
A promising approach for creating ML models that inherently satisfy constraints is to encode background knowledge as logical constraints that guide the learning process via so-called differentiable logics.
In this research preview, we compare and evaluate various logics from the literature in weakly-supervised contexts, presenting our findings and highlighting open problems for future work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T11:33:08Z) - Notes on Applicability of Explainable AI Methods to Machine Learning
Models Using Features Extracted by Persistent Homology [0.0]
Persistent homology (PH) has found wide-ranging applications in machine learning.
The ability to achieve satisfactory levels of accuracy with relatively simple downstream machine learning models, when processing these extracted features, underlines the pipeline's superior interpretability.
We explore the potential application of explainable AI methodologies to this PH-ML pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-15T08:56:15Z) - Closing the loop: Autonomous experiments enabled by
machine-learning-based online data analysis in synchrotron beamline
environments [80.49514665620008]
Machine learning can be used to enhance research involving large or rapidly generated datasets.
In this study, we describe the incorporation of ML into a closed-loop workflow for X-ray reflectometry (XRR)
We present solutions that provide an elementary data analysis in real time during the experiment without introducing the additional software dependencies in the beamline control software environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T21:21:19Z) - SOLIS -- The MLOps journey from data acquisition to actionable insights [62.997667081978825]
In this paper we present a unified deployment pipeline and freedom-to-operate approach that supports all requirements while using basic cross-platform tensor framework and script language engines.
This approach however does not supply the needed procedures and pipelines for the actual deployment of machine learning capabilities in real production grade systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-22T14:45:37Z) - TRAIL: Near-Optimal Imitation Learning with Suboptimal Data [100.83688818427915]
We present training objectives that use offline datasets to learn a factored transition model.
Our theoretical analysis shows that the learned latent action space can boost the sample-efficiency of downstream imitation learning.
To learn the latent action space in practice, we propose TRAIL (Transition-Reparametrized Actions for Imitation Learning), an algorithm that learns an energy-based transition model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T21:05:00Z) - Learning Dexterous Manipulation from Suboptimal Experts [69.8017067648129]
Relative Entropy Q-Learning (REQ) is a simple policy algorithm that combines ideas from successful offline and conventional RL algorithms.
We show how REQ is also effective for general off-policy RL, offline RL, and RL from demonstrations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-16T18:48:49Z) - On the Robustness of Active Learning [0.7340017786387767]
Active Learning is concerned with how to identify the most useful samples for a Machine Learning algorithm to be trained with.
We find that it is often applied with not enough care and domain knowledge.
We propose the new "Sum of Squared Logits" method based on the Simpson diversity index and investigate the effect of using the confusion matrix for balancing in sample selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-18T09:07:23Z) - Relational Neural Machines [19.569025323453257]
This paper presents a novel framework allowing jointly train the parameters of the learners and of a First-Order Logic based reasoner.
A Neural Machine is able recover both classical learning results in case of pure sub-symbolic learning, and Markov Logic Networks.
Proper algorithmic solutions are devised to make learning and inference tractable in large-scale problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-06T10:53:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.