Comparing Differentiable Logics for Learning Systems: A Research Preview
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09809v1
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:33:08 GMT
- Title: Comparing Differentiable Logics for Learning Systems: A Research Preview
- Authors: Thomas Flinkow (Maynooth University), Barak A. Pearlmutter (Maynooth
University), Rosemary Monahan (Maynooth University)
- Abstract summary: Research on formal verification of machine learning (ML) systems indicates that learning from data alone often fails to capture underlying background knowledge.
A promising approach for creating ML models that inherently satisfy constraints is to encode background knowledge as logical constraints that guide the learning process via so-called differentiable logics.
In this research preview, we compare and evaluate various logics from the literature in weakly-supervised contexts, presenting our findings and highlighting open problems for future work.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Extensive research on formal verification of machine learning (ML) systems
indicates that learning from data alone often fails to capture underlying
background knowledge. A variety of verifiers have been developed to ensure that
a machine-learnt model satisfies correctness and safety properties, however,
these verifiers typically assume a trained network with fixed weights.
ML-enabled autonomous systems are required to not only detect incorrect
predictions, but should also possess the ability to self-correct, continuously
improving and adapting. A promising approach for creating ML models that
inherently satisfy constraints is to encode background knowledge as logical
constraints that guide the learning process via so-called differentiable
logics. In this research preview, we compare and evaluate various logics from
the literature in weakly-supervised contexts, presenting our findings and
highlighting open problems for future work. Our experimental results are
broadly consistent with results reported previously in literature; however,
learning with differentiable logics introduces a new hyperparameter that is
difficult to tune and has significant influence on the effectiveness of the
logics.
Related papers
- JustLogic: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Deductive Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.99046112135311]
We introduce JustLogic, a synthetically generated deductive reasoning benchmark for rigorous evaluation of Large Language Models.
JustLogic is highly complex, capable of generating a diverse range of linguistic patterns, vocabulary, and argument structures.
Our experimental results reveal that most state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs perform significantly worse than the human average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T15:49:10Z) - Dynamics of Supervised and Reinforcement Learning in the Non-Linear Perceptron [3.069335774032178]
We use a dataset-process approach to derive flow equations describing learning.
We characterize the effects of the learning rule (supervised or reinforcement learning, SL/RL) and input-data distribution on the perceptron's learning curve.
This approach points a way toward analyzing learning dynamics for more-complex circuit architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T17:58:28Z) - Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment [10.814585613336778]
Causal representation learning aims to combine the core strengths of machine learning and causality.
This thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T09:14:40Z) - Leveraging Knowlegde Graphs for Interpretable Feature Generation [0.0]
KRAFT is an AutoFE framework that leverages a knowledge graph to guide the generation of interpretable features.
Our hybrid AI approach combines a neural generator to transform raw features through a series of transformations and a knowledge-based reasoner to evaluate features interpretability.
The generator is trained through Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to maximize the prediction accuracy and the interpretability of the generated features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T19:51:29Z) - A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning [73.77088902676306]
We take a closer look at the self-verification abilities of large language models (LLMs) in the context of logical reasoning.
Our main findings suggest that existing LLMs could struggle to identify fallacious reasoning steps accurately and may fall short of guaranteeing the validity of self-verification methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T07:13:10Z) - Neuro-symbolic model for cantilever beams damage detection [0.0]
We propose a neuro-symbolic model for the detection of damages in cantilever beams based on a novel cognitive architecture.
The hybrid discriminative model is introduced under the name Logic Convolutional Neural Regressor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T13:12:39Z) - Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural Networks [65.23508422635862]
We propose learning rules with the recently proposed logical neural networks (LNN)
Compared to others, LNNs offer strong connection to classical Boolean logic.
Our experiments on standard benchmarking tasks confirm that LNN rules are highly interpretable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-06T19:38:30Z) - FF-NSL: Feed-Forward Neural-Symbolic Learner [70.978007919101]
This paper introduces a neural-symbolic learning framework, called Feed-Forward Neural-Symbolic Learner (FF-NSL)
FF-NSL integrates state-of-the-art ILP systems based on the Answer Set semantics, with neural networks, in order to learn interpretable hypotheses from labelled unstructured data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-24T15:38:34Z) - Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddings [55.08537975896764]
There is an increasing need for active learning algorithms that are compatible with deep neural networks.
This article introduces BAIT, a practical representation of tractable, and high-performing active learning algorithm for neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-17T17:26:31Z) - Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine
Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resources [78.72922528736011]
We propose a novel approach, black-box adversarial reprogramming (BAR), that repurposes a well-trained black-box machine learning model.
Using zeroth order optimization and multi-label mapping techniques, BAR can reprogram a black-box ML model solely based on its input-output responses.
BAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and yields comparable performance to the vanilla adversarial reprogramming method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-17T01:52:34Z) - Relational Neural Machines [19.569025323453257]
This paper presents a novel framework allowing jointly train the parameters of the learners and of a First-Order Logic based reasoner.
A Neural Machine is able recover both classical learning results in case of pure sub-symbolic learning, and Markov Logic Networks.
Proper algorithmic solutions are devised to make learning and inference tractable in large-scale problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-06T10:53:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.