Tracing Partisan Bias to Its Emotional Fingerprints: A Computational Approach to Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01284v2
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:15:48 GMT
• Title: Tracing Partisan Bias to Its Emotional Fingerprints: A Computational Approach to Mitigation
• Authors: Junjie Liu, Xi Luo, Sirong Wu, Gengchen Sun, Yuhui Deng,
• Abstract summary: This study introduces a novel framework for analysing and mitigating media bias by tracing partisan stances to their linguistic roots in emotional language.<n>We posit that partisan bias is not merely an abstract stance but materialises as quantifiable 'emotional fingerprints' within news texts.<n>Our analysis of the Allsides dataset confirms this hypothesis, revealing distinct and statistically significant emotional fingerprints for left, centre, and right-leaning media.<n>We then propose a computational approach to mitigation through NeutraSum, a model designed to neutralise these identified emotional patterns.
• Score: 15.247769531485426
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study introduces a novel framework for analysing and mitigating media bias by tracing partisan stances to their linguistic roots in emotional language. We posit that partisan bias is not merely an abstract stance but materialises as quantifiable 'emotional fingerprints' within news texts. These fingerprints are systematically measured using the Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) framework, allowing us to decode the affective strategies behind partisan framing. Our analysis of the Allsides dataset confirms this hypothesis, revealing distinct and statistically significant emotional fingerprints for left, centre, and right-leaning media. Based on this evidence-driven approach, we then propose a computational approach to mitigation through NeutraSum, a model designed to neutralise these identified emotional patterns. By explicitly targeting the VAD characteristics of biased language, NeutraSum generates summaries that are not only coherent but also demonstrably closer to an emotionally neutral baseline. Experimental results validate our framework: NeutraSum successfully erases the partisan emotional fingerprints from its summaries, achieving a demonstrably lower emotional bias score than other models. This work pioneers a new path for bias mitigation, shifting the focus from treating symptoms (political labels) to addressing the cause: the emotional encoding of partisan bias in language.

Related papers

• ADEPT: RL-Aligned Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools -- From Consensus Learning to Ambiguity-Driven Emotion Reasoning [67.22219034602514]
  We introduce ADEPT (Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools), a framework that reframes emotion recognition as a multi-turn inquiry process.<n> ADEPT transforms an SLLM into an agent that maintains an evolving candidate emotion set and adaptively invokes dedicated semantic and acoustic probing tools.<n>We show that ADEPT improves primary emotion accuracy in most settings while substantially improving minor emotion characterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T08:33:37Z)
• How Bias Binds: Measuring Hidden Associations for Bias Control in Text-to-Image Compositions [20.09444331826756]
  This work investigates how bias manifests under semantic binding.<n>We introduce a bias adherence score that quantifies how specific object-attribute bindings activate bias.<n>We develop a training-free context-bias control framework to explore how token decoupling can facilitate the debiasing of semantic bindings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T13:27:05Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Geopolitical biases in LLMs: what are the "good" and the "bad" countries according to contemporary language models [52.00270888041742]
  We introduce a novel dataset with neutral event descriptions and contrasting viewpoints from different countries.<n>Our findings show significant geopolitical biases, with models favoring specific national narratives.<n>Simple debiasing prompts had a limited effect on reducing these biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T10:45:17Z)
• Breaking BERT: Gradient Attack on Twitter Sentiment Analysis for Targeted Misclassification [0.0]
  Bidirectional Representations from Transformers BERT has been widely adapted in sentiment analysis.<n>BERT is susceptible to adversarial attacks.<n>This paper aims to scrutinize the inherent vulnerabilities of such models in Twitter sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T04:21:19Z)
• Analyzing Sentiment Polarity Reduction in News Presentation through Contextual Perturbation and Large Language Models [1.8512070255576754]
  This paper introduces a novel approach to tackle this problem by reducing the polarity of latent sentiments in news content. We employ transformation constraints to modify sentences while preserving their core semantics. Our experiments and human evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of these two models in achieving reduced sentiment polarity with minimal modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T13:27:32Z)
• P^3SUM: Preserving Author's Perspective in News Summarization with Diffusion Language Models [57.571395694391654]
  We find that existing approaches alter the political opinions and stances of news articles in more than 50% of summaries. We propose P3SUM, a diffusion model-based summarization approach controlled by political perspective classifiers. Experiments on three news summarization datasets demonstrate that P3SUM outperforms state-of-the-art summarization systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T10:14:28Z)
• Mitigating Framing Bias with Polarity Minimization Loss [56.24404488440295]
  Framing bias plays a significant role in exacerbating political polarization by distorting the perception of actual events. We propose a new loss function that encourages the model to minimize the polarity difference between the polarized input articles to reduce framing bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T09:50:23Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Seeking Subjectivity in Visual Emotion Distribution Learning [93.96205258496697]
  Visual Emotion Analysis (VEA) aims to predict people's emotions towards different visual stimuli. Existing methods often predict visual emotion distribution in a unified network, neglecting the inherent subjectivity in its crowd voting process. We propose a novel textitSubjectivity Appraise-and-Match Network (SAMNet) to investigate the subjectivity in visual emotion distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T02:20:03Z)
• NeuS: Neutral Multi-News Summarization for Mitigating Framing Bias [54.89737992911079]
  We propose a new task, a neutral summary generation from multiple news headlines of the varying political spectrum. One of the most interesting observations is that generation models can hallucinate not only factually inaccurate or unverifiable content, but also politically biased content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T07:06:01Z)
• Balancing out Bias: Achieving Fairness Through Training Reweighting [58.201275105195485]
  Bias in natural language processing arises from models learning characteristics of the author such as gender and race. Existing methods for mitigating and measuring bias do not directly account for correlations between author demographics and linguistic variables. This paper introduces a very simple but highly effective method for countering bias using instance reweighting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T23:40:28Z)
• Enabling News Consumers to View and Understand Biased News Coverage: A Study on the Perception and Visualization of Media Bias [7.092487352312782]
  We create three manually annotated datasets and test varying visualization strategies. Results show no strong effects of becoming aware of the bias of the treatment groups compared to the control group. Using a multilevel model, we find that perceived journalist bias is significantly related to perceived political extremeness and impartiality of the article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T10:16:54Z)
• Mitigating Media Bias through Neutral Article Generation [39.29914845102368]
  Existing mitigation work displays articles from multiple news outlets to provide diverse news coverage, but without neutralizing the bias inherent in each of the displayed articles. We propose a new task, a single neutralized article generation out of multiple biased articles, to facilitate more efficient access to balanced and unbiased information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T08:37:26Z)
• Analyzing Political Bias and Unfairness in News Articles at Different Levels of Granularity [35.19976910093135]
  The research presented in this paper addresses not only the automatic detection of bias but goes one step further in that it explores how political bias and unfairness are manifested linguistically. We utilize a new corpus of 6964 news articles with labels derived from adfontesmedia.com and develop a neural model for bias assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T22:25:00Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
  We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space. We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.