PSYCHE: A Multi-faceted Patient Simulation Framework for Evaluation of Psychiatric Assessment Conversational Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01594v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 01:38:46 GMT
• Title: PSYCHE: A Multi-faceted Patient Simulation Framework for Evaluation of Psychiatric Assessment Conversational Agents
• Authors: Jingoo Lee, Kyungho Lim, Young-Chul Jung, Byung-Hoon Kim,
• Abstract summary: Psychiatric assessment conversational agents (PACAs) aim to simulate the role of psychiatrists in clinical evaluations. Here, we propose PSYCHE, a novel framework designed to enable the 1) clinically relevant, 2) ethically safe, 3) cost-efficient, and 4) quantitative evaluation of PACAs. This is achieved by simulating psychiatric patients based on a multi-faceted psychiatric construct that defines the simulated patients' profiles, histories, and behaviors.
• Score: 2.8216674865505627
• License:
• Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated the development of conversational agents capable of generating human-like responses. Since psychiatric assessments typically involve complex conversational interactions between psychiatrists and patients, there is growing interest in developing LLM-based psychiatric assessment conversational agents (PACAs) that aim to simulate the role of psychiatrists in clinical evaluations. However, standardized methods for benchmarking the clinical appropriateness of PACAs' interaction with patients still remain underexplored. Here, we propose PSYCHE, a novel framework designed to enable the 1) clinically relevant, 2) ethically safe, 3) cost-efficient, and 4) quantitative evaluation of PACAs. This is achieved by simulating psychiatric patients based on a multi-faceted psychiatric construct that defines the simulated patients' profiles, histories, and behaviors, which PACAs are expected to assess. We validate the effectiveness of PSYCHE through a study with 10 board-certified psychiatrists, supported by an in-depth analysis of the simulated patient utterances.

Related papers

• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment. We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews. Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• CBT-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Assisting Cognitive Behavior Therapy [67.23830698947637]
  We propose a new benchmark, CBT-BENCH, for the systematic evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) assistance. We include three levels of tasks in CBT-BENCH: I: Basic CBT knowledge acquisition, with the task of multiple-choice questions; II: Cognitive model understanding, with the tasks of cognitive distortion classification, primary core belief classification, and fine-grained core belief classification; III: Therapeutic response generation, with the task of generating responses to patient speech in CBT therapy sessions. Experimental results indicate that while LLMs perform well in reciting CBT knowledge, they fall short in complex real-world scenarios
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T04:52:57Z)
• Depression Diagnosis Dialogue Simulation: Self-improving Psychiatrist with Tertiary Memory [35.41386783586689]
  This paper introduces the Agent Mental Clinic (AMC), a self-improving conversational agent system designed to enhance depression diagnosis through simulated dialogues between patient and psychiatrist agents. We design a psychiatrist agent consisting of a tertiary memory structure, a dialogue control and a memory sampling module, fully leveraging the skills reflected by the psychiatrist agent, achieving great accuracy on depression risk and suicide risk diagnosis via conversation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T14:25:08Z)
• LLM Questionnaire Completion for Automatic Psychiatric Assessment [49.1574468325115]
  We employ a Large Language Model (LLM) to convert unstructured psychological interviews into structured questionnaires spanning various psychiatric and personality domains. The obtained answers are coded as features, which are used to predict standardized psychiatric measures of depression (PHQ-8) and PTSD (PCL-C)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T09:03:11Z)
• Chain-of-Interaction: Enhancing Large Language Models for Psychiatric Behavior Understanding by Dyadic Contexts [4.403408362362806]
  We introduce the Chain-of-Interaction prompting method to contextualize large language models for psychiatric decision support by the dyadic interactions. This approach enables large language models to leverage the coding scheme, patient state, and domain knowledge for patient behavioral coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:47:49Z)
• COMPASS: Computational Mapping of Patient-Therapist Alliance Strategies with Language Modeling [14.04866656172336]
  We present a novel framework to infer the therapeutic working alliance from the natural language used in psychotherapy sessions. Our approach utilizes advanced large language models (LLMs) to analyze transcripts of psychotherapy sessions and compare them with distributed representations of statements in the working alliance inventory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T16:56:44Z)
• PsychoGAT: A Novel Psychological Measurement Paradigm through Interactive Fiction Games with LLM Agents [68.50571379012621]
  Psychological measurement is essential for mental health, self-understanding, and personal development. PsychoGAT (Psychological Game AgenTs) achieves statistically significant excellence in psychometric metrics such as reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:00:30Z)
• Empowering Psychotherapy with Large Language Models: Cognitive Distortion Detection through Diagnosis of Thought Prompting [82.64015366154884]
  We study the task of cognitive distortion detection and propose the Diagnosis of Thought (DoT) prompting. DoT performs diagnosis on the patient's speech via three stages: subjectivity assessment to separate the facts and the thoughts; contrastive reasoning to elicit the reasoning processes supporting and contradicting the thoughts; and schema analysis to summarize the cognition schemas. Experiments demonstrate that DoT obtains significant improvements over ChatGPT for cognitive distortion detection, while generating high-quality rationales approved by human experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T02:47:21Z)
• The Capability of Large Language Models to Measure Psychiatric Functioning [9.938814639951842]
  The Med-PaLM 2 is capable of assessing psychiatric functioning across a range of psychiatric conditions. The strongest performance was the prediction of depression scores based on standardized assessments. Results show the potential for general clinical language models to flexibly predict psychiatric risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T15:52:27Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.