CHAIR -- Classifier of Hallucination as Improver

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02518v2
• Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:49:44 GMT
• Title: CHAIR -- Classifier of Hallucination as Improver
• Authors: Ao Sun,
• Abstract summary: We introduce CHAIR (Classifier of Hallucination As ImproveR), a supervised framework for detecting hallucinations by analyzing internal logits from each layer of every token.<n>Our method extracts a compact set of features such as maximum, minimum, mean, standard deviation, and slope-from the token logits across all layers, enabling effective hallucination detection without overfitting.
• Score: 1.397828249435483
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we introduce CHAIR (Classifier of Hallucination As ImproveR), a supervised framework for detecting hallucinations by analyzing internal logits from each layer of every token. Our method extracts a compact set of features such as maximum, minimum, mean, standard deviation, and slope-from the token logits across all layers, enabling effective hallucination detection without overfitting. Experiments on TruthfulQA and MMLU datasets demonstrate that CHAIR significantly improves detection accuracy, particularly in zero-shot scenarios, showcasing its robustness and generalizability. Beyond hallucination detection, CHAIR highlights the potential of using internal representations for designing advanced decoding strategies. By leveraging patterns in logits, we suggest that more sophisticated models and adaptive decoding methods could further reduce hallucinations and enhance text completion quality. CHAIR not only offers a practical solution for detecting hallucinations but also lays the groundwork for exploring richer representations in LLMs to improve their factuality and coherence.

Related papers

• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination" This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• Generate, but Verify: Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models with Retrospective Resampling [67.14942827452161]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual understanding but often suffer from visual hallucinations. In this work, we introduce REVERSE, a unified framework that integrates hallucination-aware training with on-the-fly self-verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:59:22Z)
• Efficient Contrastive Decoding with Probabilistic Hallucination Detection - Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models - [1.2499537119440245]
  Efficient Contrastive Decoding (ECD) is a simple method that leverages probabilistic hallucination detection to shift the output distribution towards contextually accurate answers at inference time. Our experiments show that ECD effectively mitigates hallucinations, outperforming state-of-the-art methods with respect to performance on LVLM benchmarks and computation time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T14:50:25Z)
• Robust Hallucination Detection in LLMs via Adaptive Token Selection [25.21763722332831]
  Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) pose significant safety concerns that impede their broader deployment. We propose HaMI, a novel approach that enables robust detection of hallucinations through adaptive selection and learning of critical tokens. We achieve this robustness by an innovative formulation of the Hallucination detection task as Multiple Instance (HaMI) learning over token-level representations within a sequence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T15:39:10Z)
• HuDEx: Integrating Hallucination Detection and Explainability for Enhancing the Reliability of LLM responses [0.12499537119440242]
  This paper proposes an explanation enhanced hallucination-detection model, coined as HuDEx. The proposed model provides a novel approach to integrate detection with explanations, and enable both users and the LLM itself to understand and reduce errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T04:17:02Z)
• Layer Importance and Hallucination Analysis in Large Language Models via Enhanced Activation Variance-Sparsity [5.854247492297834]
  This paper first explores layer importance using the Activation Variance-Sparsity Score (AVSS) Building on AVSS, we propose an enhanced version tailored to assess hallucination propensity across layers (EAVSS) This improved approach introduces Hallucination-Specific Activation Variance (HSAV) and Hallucination-Specific Sparsity (HSS) metrics, allowing precise identification of hallucination-prone layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T09:33:47Z)
• THaMES: An End-to-End Tool for Hallucination Mitigation and Evaluation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucination, the generation of factually incorrect content, is a growing challenge in Large Language Models.<n>This paper introduces THaMES, an integrated framework and library addressing this gap.<n> THaMES offers an end-to-end solution for evaluating and mitigating hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T16:55:25Z)
• A Gradient Analysis Framework for Rewarding Good and Penalizing Bad Examples in Language Models [63.949883238901414]
  We present a unique angle of gradient analysis of loss functions that simultaneously reward good examples and penalize bad ones in LMs. We find that ExMATE serves as a superior surrogate for MLE, and that combining DPO with ExMATE instead of MLE further enhances both the statistical (5-7%) and generative (+18% win rate) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:46:18Z)
• ANAH-v2: Scaling Analytical Hallucination Annotation of Large Language Models [65.12177400764506]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit hallucinations in long-form question-answering tasks across various domains and wide applications. Current hallucination detection and mitigation datasets are limited in domains and sizes. This paper introduces an iterative self-training framework that simultaneously and progressively scales up the hallucination annotation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T17:56:38Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization [123.54980913741828]
  Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in understanding multimodal data. They invariably suffer from hallucinations, leading to a disconnect between the generated text and the corresponding images. Almost all current visual contrastive decoding methods attempt to mitigate these hallucinations by introducing visual uncertainty information. However, they struggle to precisely induce the hallucinatory tokens, which severely limits their effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:46:31Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback [40.930238150365795]
  We propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) via fine-grained AI feedback. We generate a small-size hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models. Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:46:10Z)
• VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [57.43276586087863]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs. Existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations. We introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T04:49:22Z)
• PoLLMgraph: Unraveling Hallucinations in Large Language Models via State Transition Dynamics [51.17512229589]
  PoLLMgraph is a model-based white-box detection and forecasting approach for large language models. We show that hallucination can be effectively detected by analyzing the LLM's internal state transition dynamics. Our work paves a new way for model-based white-box analysis of LLMs, motivating the research community to further explore, understand, and refine the intricate dynamics of LLM behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T20:02:20Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information. We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z)
• Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focus [99.33091772494751]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity for their impressive performance across diverse fields. LLMs are prone to hallucinate untruthful or nonsensical outputs that fail to meet user expectations. We propose a novel reference-free, uncertainty-based method for detecting hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:39:17Z)
• Evolving parametrized Loss for Image Classification Learning on Small Datasets [1.4685355149711303]
  This paper proposes a meta-learning approach to evolving a parametrized loss function, which is called Meta-Loss Network (MLN) In our approach, the MLN is embedded in the framework of classification learning as a differentiable objective function. Experiment results demonstrate that the MLN effectively improved generalization compared to classical cross-entropy error and mean squared error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T10:00:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.