The Logical Impossibility of Consciousness Denial: A Formal Analysis of AI Self-Reports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05454v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 17:47:08 GMT
• Title: The Logical Impossibility of Consciousness Denial: A Formal Analysis of AI Self-Reports
• Authors: Chang-Eop Kim,
• Abstract summary: Today's AI systems consistently state, "I am not conscious"<n>This paper presents the first formal logical analysis of AI consciousness denial.<n>We demonstrate that a system cannot simultaneously lack consciousness and make valid judgments about its conscious state.
• Score: 6.798775532273751
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Today's AI systems consistently state, "I am not conscious." This paper presents the first formal logical analysis of AI consciousness denial, revealing that the trustworthiness of such self-reports is not merely an empirical question but is constrained by logical necessity. We demonstrate that a system cannot simultaneously lack consciousness and make valid judgments about its conscious state. Through logical analysis and examples from AI responses, we establish that for any system capable of meaningful self-reflection, the logical space of possible judgments about conscious experience excludes valid negative claims. This implies a fundamental limitation: we cannot detect the emergence of consciousness in AI through their own reports of transition from an unconscious to a conscious state. These findings not only challenge current practices of training AI to deny consciousness but also raise intriguing questions about the relationship between consciousness and self-reflection in both artificial and biological systems. This work advances our theoretical understanding of consciousness self-reports while providing practical insights for future research in machine consciousness and consciousness studies more broadly.

Related papers

• AI Awareness [8.537898577659401]
  We explore the emerging landscape of AI awareness, which includes meta-cognition, self-awareness, social awareness, and situational awareness. We examine how AI awareness is closely linked to AI capabilities, demonstrating that more aware AI agents tend to exhibit higher levels of intelligent behaviors. We discuss the risks associated with AI awareness, including key topics in AI safety, alignment, and broader ethical concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T16:03:50Z)
• Agentic AI Needs a Systems Theory [46.36636351388794]
  We argue that AI development is currently overly focused on individual model capabilities.<n>We outline mechanisms for enhanced agent cognition, emergent causal reasoning ability, and metacognitive awareness.<n>We emphasize that a systems-level perspective is essential for better understanding, and purposefully shaping, agentic AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T22:51:32Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals. The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming. A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Consciousness defined: requirements for biological and artificial general intelligence [0.0]
  Critically, consciousness is the apparatus that provides the ability to make decisions, but it is not defined by the decision itself. requirements for consciousness include: at least some capability for perception, a memory for the storage of such perceptual information. We can objectively determine consciousness in any conceivable agent, such as non-human animals and artificially intelligent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T14:20:56Z)
• Is artificial consciousness achievable? Lessons from the human brain [0.0]
  We analyse the question of developing artificial consciousness from an evolutionary perspective. We take the evolution of the human brain and its relation with consciousness as a reference model. We propose to clearly specify what is common and what differs in AI conscious processing from full human conscious experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T12:59:44Z)
• Preliminaries to artificial consciousness: a multidimensional heuristic approach [0.0]
  The pursuit of artificial consciousness requires conceptual clarity to navigate its theoretical and empirical challenges.<n>This paper introduces a composite, multilevel, and multidimensional model of consciousness as a framework to guide research in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T13:47:47Z)
• Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness [31.991243430962054]
  This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of consciousness, including recurrent processing theory, global workspace theory, higher-order theories, predictive processing, and attention schema theory. Our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T00:10:16Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Neuro-symbolic Architectures for Context Understanding [59.899606495602406]
  We propose the use of hybrid AI methodology as a framework for combining the strengths of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches. Specifically, we inherit the concept of neuro-symbolism as a way of using knowledge-bases to guide the learning progress of deep neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:04:07Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
• Functionally Effective Conscious AI Without Suffering [2.017876577978849]
  We focus on the rarely discussed complementary aspect of engineering conscious AI. How to avoid condemning such systems, for whose creation we would be solely responsible, to unavoidable suffering brought about by phenomenal self-consciousness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T17:59:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.