Data Enrichment Work and AI Labor in Latin America and the Caribbean
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06981v1
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:11:47 GMT
- Title: Data Enrichment Work and AI Labor in Latin America and the Caribbean
- Authors: Gianna Williams, Maya De Los Santos, Alexandra To, Saiph Savage,
- Abstract summary: We conducted a survey with 100 crowdworkers across 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries.
We discovered that these workers exhibited pride and respect for their digital labor, with strong support and admiration from their families.
Crowd work was also seen as a stepping stone to financial and professional independence.
- Score: 48.06503696906059
- License:
- Abstract: The global AI surge demands crowdworkers from diverse languages and cultures. They are pivotal in labeling data for enabling global AI systems. Despite global significance, research has primarily focused on understanding the perspectives and experiences of US and India crowdworkers, leaving a notable gap. To bridge this, we conducted a survey with 100 crowdworkers across 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries. We discovered that these workers exhibited pride and respect for their digital labor, with strong support and admiration from their families. Notably, crowd work was also seen as a stepping stone to financial and professional independence. Surprisingly, despite wanting more connection, these workers also felt isolated from peers and doubtful of others' labor quality. They resisted collaboration and gender-based tools, valuing gender-neutrality. Our work advances HCI understanding of Latin American and Caribbean crowdwork, offering insights for digital resistance tools for the region.
Related papers
- The digital labour of artificial intelligence in Latin America: a comparison of Argentina, Brazil, and Venezuela [0.0]
This article lifts the veil on the precarious and low-paid 'data workers' who prepare data to train, test, check, and otherwise support models in the shadow of globalized AI production.
We show that data work is intertwined with economic hardship, inequalities, and informality.
We provide insights for the regulation of AI and the future of work, aiming to achieve positive outcomes for all stakeholders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T10:10:30Z) - The Glamorisation of Unpaid Labour: AI and its Influencers [0.0]
Digital Value Networks (DVNs) disproportionately affect workers in Africa, Latin America, and India.
We discuss unethical practices to automate Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs) through gig work platforms and the capitalisation of data collection utilising influencers in social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T06:44:25Z) - China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together [2.115100245425281]
We analyze a dataset of over 350,000 AI scientists and 5,000,000 AI papers.
Most AI scientists who move to China come from the U.S., and most who move to the U.S. come from China.
Although the number of collaborations between the two countries has increased since the dawn of the millennium, such collaborations continue to be relatively rare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T16:47:51Z) - Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers? An Interview Study on Human-AI
Collaboration in Data Storytelling [59.08591308749448]
We interviewed eighteen data workers from both industry and academia to learn where and how they would like to collaborate with AI.
Surprisingly, though the participants showed excitement about collaborating with AI, many of them also expressed reluctance and pointed out nuanced reasons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T15:30:05Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots.
We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z) - How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI [75.40051547428592]
Private companies, public sector organizations, and academic groups have outlined ethical values they consider important for responsible AI technologies.
While their recommendations converge on a set of central values, little is known about the values a more representative public would find important for the AI technologies they interact with and might be affected by.
We conducted a survey examining how individuals perceive and prioritize responsible AI values across three groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-16T14:39:37Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [65.60507052509406]
The aim of this workshop is to give researchers from academia and industry the possibility to discuss the inter-and multi-disciplinary nature of the relationships between people and robots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T16:52:12Z) - My Boss the Computer: A Bayesian analysis of socio-demographic and
cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward the Non-Human Resource
Management [0.0]
This study collects a cross-sectional dataset of 1,015 survey responses of international students from 48 countries and 8 regions worldwide.
A majority of the respondents (52%) are concerned about being managed by AI.
We find having a higher income, being male, majoring in business, and/or self-rated familiarity with AI correlate with a more positive view of emotional AI in the workplace.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T09:53:12Z) - Young Adult Unemployment Through the Lens of Social Media: Italy as a
case study [108.33144653708091]
We employ survey data together with social media data to analyse personality, moral values, but also cultural elements of the young unemployed population in Italy.
Our findings show that there are small but significant differences in personality and moral values, with the unemployed males to be less agreeable.
Unemployed have a more collectivist point of view, valuing more in-group loyalty, authority, and purity foundations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-09T10:56:04Z) - Towards an Atlas of Cultural Commonsense for Machine Reasoning [18.472517610024866]
Existing commonsense reasoning datasets for AI and NLP tasks fail to address an important aspect of human life: cultural differences.
We introduce an approach that extends prior work on crowdsourcing commonsense knowledge by incorporating differences in knowledge that are attributable to cultural or national groups.
We demonstrate the technique by collecting commonsense knowledge that surrounds six fairly universal rituals across two national groups: the United States and India.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-11T21:24:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.