Will AI Take My Job? Evolving Perceptions of Automation and Labor Risk in Latin America
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08841v2
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 20:43:16 GMT
- Title: Will AI Take My Job? Evolving Perceptions of Automation and Labor Risk in Latin America
- Authors: Andrea Cremaschi, Dae-Jin Lee, Manuele Leonelli,
- Abstract summary: Drawing on responses from over 48,000 individuals across 16 countries, we analyze fear of job loss due to artificial intelligence and robotics.<n>Our findings reveal substantial temporal and cross-country variation, with a notable peak in fear during 2018.<n>These results contribute to a broader understanding of public attitudes toward automation beyond the Global North.
- Score: 1.8434042562191815
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As artificial intelligence and robotics increasingly reshape the global labor market, understanding public perceptions of these technologies becomes critical. We examine how these perceptions have evolved across Latin America, using survey data from the 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2023 waves of the Latinobar\'ometro. Drawing on responses from over 48,000 individuals across 16 countries, we analyze fear of job loss due to artificial intelligence and robotics. Using statistical modeling and latent class analysis, we identify key structural and ideological predictors of concern, with education level and political orientation emerging as the most consistent drivers. Our findings reveal substantial temporal and cross-country variation, with a notable peak in fear during 2018 and distinct attitudinal profiles emerging from latent segmentation. These results offer new insights into the social and structural dimensions of AI anxiety in emerging economies and contribute to a broader understanding of public attitudes toward automation beyond the Global North.
Related papers
- A roadmap for AI in robotics [55.87087746398059]
We are witnessing growing excitement in robotics at the prospect of leveraging the potential of AI to tackle some of the outstanding barriers to the full deployment of robots in our daily lives.<n>This article offers an assessment of what AI for robotics has achieved since the 1990s and proposes a short- and medium-term research roadmap listing challenges and promises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-26T15:18:28Z) - Future of Work with AI Agents: Auditing Automation and Augmentation Potential across the U.S. Workforce [45.348336032930845]
We introduce a novel framework to assess which occupational tasks workers want AI agents to automate or augment.<n>Our framework features an audio-enhanced mini-interview to capture nuanced worker desires.<n>We construct the WORKBank database to capture preferences from 1,500 domain workers and capability assessments from AI experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T23:05:52Z) - The digital labour of artificial intelligence in Latin America: a comparison of Argentina, Brazil, and Venezuela [0.0]
This article lifts the veil on the precarious and low-paid 'data workers' who prepare data to train, test, check, and otherwise support models in the shadow of globalized AI production.<n>We show that data work is intertwined with economic hardship, inequalities, and informality.<n>We provide insights for the regulation of AI and the future of work, aiming to achieve positive outcomes for all stakeholders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T10:10:30Z) - Data Enrichment Work and AI Labor in Latin America and the Caribbean [48.06503696906059]
We conducted a survey with 100 crowdworkers across 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries.<n>We discovered that these workers exhibited pride and respect for their digital labor, with strong support and admiration from their families.<n>Crowd work was also seen as a stepping stone to financial and professional independence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-13T00:11:47Z) - Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal.
We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z) - Artificial intelligence in social science: A study based on
bibliometrics analysis [0.0]
This article presents the results of a bibliometric analysis of AI-related publications in the social sciences over the last ten years (2013-2022).
More than 19,408 articles have been published, 85% from 2008 to 2022, showing that research in this field is increasing significantly year on year.
The United States is the country that publishes the most (20%), followed by China (13%)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-09T15:16:44Z) - Bending the Automation Bias Curve: A Study of Human and AI-based
Decision Making in National Security Contexts [0.0]
We theorize about the relationship between background knowledge about AI, trust in AI, and how these interact with other factors to influence the probability of automation bias.
We test these in a preregistered task identification experiment across a representative sample of 9000 adults in 9 countries with varying levels of AI industries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T18:57:36Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on
Artificial Intelligence [74.2630823914258]
The report examines eight domains of typical urban settings on which AI is likely to have impact over the coming years.
It aims to provide the general public with a scientifically and technologically accurate portrayal of the current state of AI.
The charge for this report was given to the panel by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Barbara Grosz of Harvard University.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T18:35:36Z) - My Boss the Computer: A Bayesian analysis of socio-demographic and
cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward the Non-Human Resource
Management [0.0]
This study collects a cross-sectional dataset of 1,015 survey responses of international students from 48 countries and 8 regions worldwide.
A majority of the respondents (52%) are concerned about being managed by AI.
We find having a higher income, being male, majoring in business, and/or self-rated familiarity with AI correlate with a more positive view of emotional AI in the workplace.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T09:53:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.