Lessons From Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Products

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07238v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:36:33 GMT
• Title: Lessons From Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Products
• Authors: Blake Bullwinkel, Amanda Minnich, Shiven Chawla, Gary Lopez, Martin Pouliot, Whitney Maxwell, Joris de Gruyter, Katherine Pratt, Saphir Qi, Nina Chikanov, Roman Lutz, Raja Sekhar Rao Dheekonda, Bolor-Erdene Jagdagdorj, Eugenia Kim, Justin Song, Keegan Hines, Daniel Jones, Giorgio Severi, Richard Lundeen, Sam Vaughan, Victoria Westerhoff, Pete Bryan, Ram Shankar Siva Kumar, Yonatan Zunger, Chang Kawaguchi, Mark Russinovich,
• Abstract summary: In recent years, AI red teaming has emerged as a practice for probing the safety and security of generative AI systems. We offer practical recommendations aimed at aligning red teaming efforts with real world risks.
• Score: 1.5285633805077958
• License:
• Abstract: In recent years, AI red teaming has emerged as a practice for probing the safety and security of generative AI systems. Due to the nascency of the field, there are many open questions about how red teaming operations should be conducted. Based on our experience red teaming over 100 generative AI products at Microsoft, we present our internal threat model ontology and eight main lessons we have learned: 1. Understand what the system can do and where it is applied 2. You don't have to compute gradients to break an AI system 3. AI red teaming is not safety benchmarking 4. Automation can help cover more of the risk landscape 5. The human element of AI red teaming is crucial 6. Responsible AI harms are pervasive but difficult to measure 7. LLMs amplify existing security risks and introduce new ones 8. The work of securing AI systems will never be complete By sharing these insights alongside case studies from our operations, we offer practical recommendations aimed at aligning red teaming efforts with real world risks. We also highlight aspects of AI red teaming that we believe are often misunderstood and discuss open questions for the field to consider.

Related papers

• AI Red-Teaming is a Sociotechnical System. Now What? [3.0001147629373195]
  generative AI technologies find more and more real-world applications, the importance of testing their performance and safety seems paramount. Red-teaming has quickly become the primary approach to test AI models--prioritized by AI companies. We highlight the importance of understanding the values and assumptions behind red-teaming, the labor involved, and the psychological impacts on red-teamers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T22:48:19Z)
• Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
  generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications. New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z)
• Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Models [60.21722603260243]
  Our extensive survey, which examines over 120 papers, introduces a taxonomy of fine-grained attack strategies grounded in the inherent capabilities of language models. We have developed the "searcher" framework to unify various automatic red teaming approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T09:50:39Z)
• Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right [72.99597122935903]
  We explore the AI2050 "hard problems" that block the promise of AI and cause AI risks. For each problem, we outline the area, identify significant recent work, and suggest ways forward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T23:16:41Z)
• Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater? [42.35800543892003]
  We argue that while red-teaming may be a valuable big-tent idea for characterizing GenAI harm mitigations, industry may effectively apply red-teaming and other strategies behind closed doors to safeguard AI. To move toward a more robust toolbox of evaluations for generative AI, we synthesize our recommendations into a question bank meant to guide and scaffold future AI red-teaming practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T05:46:14Z)
• A Red Teaming Framework for Securing AI in Maritime Autonomous Systems [0.0]
  We propose one of the first red team frameworks for evaluating the AI security of maritime autonomous systems. This framework is a multi-part checklist, which can be tailored to different systems and requirements. We demonstrate this framework to be highly effective for a red team to use to uncover numerous vulnerabilities within a real-world maritime autonomous systems AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T14:59:07Z)
• The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming Offers a Balanced Path Forward [56.16884466478886]
  This paper reviews emerging issues with opaque and uncontrollable AI systems. It proposes an integrative framework called violet teaming to develop reliable and responsible AI. It emerged from AI safety research to manage risks proactively by design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T02:10:38Z)
• Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS) Workshop at AAAI 2022 [55.573187938617636]
  The workshop will focus on the application of AI to problems in cyber security. Cyber systems generate large volumes of data, utilizing this effectively is beyond human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T18:27:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.