Complexity Control Facilitates Reasoning-Based Compositional Generalization in Transformers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08537v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 02:54:52 GMT
• Title: Complexity Control Facilitates Reasoning-Based Compositional Generalization in Transformers
• Authors: Zhongwang Zhang, Pengxiao Lin, Zhiwei Wang, Yaoyu Zhang, Zhi-Qin John Xu,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the internal mechanisms underlying Transformers' behavior in compositional tasks. We find that complexity control strategies influence whether the model learns primitive-level rules that generalize out-of-distribution (reasoning-based solutions) or relies solely on memorized mappings (memory-based solutions)
• Score: 10.206921909332006
• License:
• Abstract: Transformers have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various tasks, yet their performance on compositional problems remains a subject of debate. In this study, we investigate the internal mechanisms underlying Transformers' behavior in compositional tasks. We find that complexity control strategies significantly influence whether the model learns primitive-level rules that generalize out-of-distribution (reasoning-based solutions) or relies solely on memorized mappings (memory-based solutions). By applying masking strategies to the model's information circuits and employing multiple complexity metrics, we reveal distinct internal working mechanisms associated with different solution types. Further analysis reveals that reasoning-based solutions exhibit a lower complexity bias, which aligns with the well-studied neuron condensation phenomenon. This lower complexity bias is hypothesized to be the key factor enabling these solutions to learn reasoning rules. We validate these conclusions across multiple real-world datasets, including image generation and natural language processing tasks, confirming the broad applicability of our findings.

Related papers

• Counting in Small Transformers: The Delicate Interplay between Attention and Feed-Forward Layers [16.26331213222281]
  We investigate how architectural design choices influence the space of solutions that a transformer can implement and learn. We characterize two different counting strategies that small transformers can implement theoretically. Our findings highlight that even in simple settings, slight variations in model design can cause significant changes to the solutions a transformer learns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T09:48:10Z)
• Limits of Deep Learning: Sequence Modeling through the Lens of Complexity Theory [15.24542569393982]
  Despite their successes, deep learning models struggle with tasks requiring complex reasoning and function composition. We present a theoretical and empirical investigation into the limitations of Structured State Space Models (SSMs) and Transformers in such tasks. We highlight the need for innovative solutions to achieve reliable multi-step reasoning and compositional task-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T19:33:23Z)
• Initialization is Critical to Whether Transformers Fit Composite Functions by Reasoning or Memorizing [10.206921909332006]
  Transformers have shown impressive capabilities across various tasks, but their performance on compositional problems remains a topic of debate. We discover that the parameter initialization scale plays a critical role in determining whether the model learns inferential (reasoning-based) solutions. We further find that inferential (reasoning-based) solutions exhibit low complexity bias, which we hypothesize is a key factor enabling them to learn individual mappings for single anchors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T20:23:24Z)
• Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality [109.79516190693415]
  We investigate the limits of transformer large language models across three representative compositional tasks. These tasks require breaking problems down into sub-steps and synthesizing these steps into a precise answer. Our empirical findings suggest that transformer LLMs solve compositional tasks by reducing multi-step compositional reasoning into linearized subgraph matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T23:24:14Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)
• Relational Reasoning via Set Transformers: Provable Efficiency and Applications to MARL [154.13105285663656]
  A cooperative Multi-A gent R einforcement Learning (MARL) with permutation invariant agents framework has achieved tremendous empirical successes in real-world applications. Unfortunately, the theoretical understanding of this MARL problem is lacking due to the curse of many agents and the limited exploration of the relational reasoning in existing works. We prove that the suboptimality gaps of the model-free and model-based algorithms are independent of and logarithmic in the number of agents respectively, which mitigates the curse of many agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T16:42:59Z)
• Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning [72.84105256353801]
  Learning causal structure poses a search problem that typically involves evaluating structures using a score or independence test. We train a variational inference model to predict the causal structure from observational/interventional data. Our models exhibit robust generalization capabilities under substantial distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:37:08Z)
• Generalization of Neural Combinatorial Solvers Through the Lens of Adversarial Robustness [68.97830259849086]
  Most datasets only capture a simpler subproblem and likely suffer from spurious features. We study adversarial robustness - a local generalization property - to reveal hard, model-specific instances and spurious features. Unlike in other applications, where perturbation models are designed around subjective notions of imperceptibility, our perturbation models are efficient and sound. Surprisingly, with such perturbations, a sufficiently expressive neural solver does not suffer from the limitations of the accuracy-robustness trade-off common in supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T07:28:11Z)
• Joint learning of variational representations and solvers for inverse problems with partially-observed data [13.984814587222811]
  In this paper, we design an end-to-end framework allowing to learn actual variational frameworks for inverse problems in a supervised setting. The variational cost and the gradient-based solver are both stated as neural networks using automatic differentiation for the latter. This leads to a data-driven discovery of variational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T19:53:34Z)
• Dynamic Federated Learning [57.14673504239551]
  Federated learning has emerged as an umbrella term for centralized coordination strategies in multi-agent environments. We consider a federated learning model where at every iteration, a random subset of available agents perform local updates based on their data. Under a non-stationary random walk model on the true minimizer for the aggregate optimization problem, we establish that the performance of the architecture is determined by three factors, namely, the data variability at each agent, the model variability across all agents, and a tracking term that is inversely proportional to the learning rate of the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T15:00:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.