A recursive Bayesian neural network for constitutive modeling of sands under monotonic loading
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10088v1
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:15:03 GMT
- Title: A recursive Bayesian neural network for constitutive modeling of sands under monotonic loading
- Authors: Toiba Noor, Soban Nasir Lone, G. V. Ramana, Rajdip Nayek,
- Abstract summary: In geotechnical engineering, models play a crucial role in describing soil behavior under varying loading conditions.
Data-driven deep learning (DL) models offer a promising alternative for developing predictive models.
When prediction is the primary focus, quantifying the predictive uncertainty of a trained DL model is crucial for informed decision-making.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: In geotechnical engineering, constitutive models play a crucial role in describing soil behavior under varying loading conditions. Data-driven deep learning (DL) models offer a promising alternative for developing predictive constitutive models. When prediction is the primary focus, quantifying the predictive uncertainty of a trained DL model and communicating this uncertainty to end users is crucial for informed decision-making. This study proposes a recursive Bayesian neural network (rBNN) framework, which builds upon recursive feedforward neural networks (rFFNNs) by introducing generalized Bayesian inference for uncertainty quantification. A significant contribution of this work is the incorporation of a sliding window approach in rFFNNs, allowing the models to effectively capture temporal dependencies across load steps. The rBNN extends this framework by treating model parameters as random variables, with their posterior distributions inferred using generalized variational inference. The proposed framework is validated on two datasets: (i) a numerically simulated consolidated drained (CD) triaxial dataset employing a hardening soil model and (ii) an experimental dataset comprising 28 CD triaxial tests on Baskarp sand. Comparative analyses with LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and GRU models demonstrate that the deterministic rFFNN achieves superior predictive accuracy, attributed to its transparent structure and sliding window design. While the rBNN marginally trails in accuracy for the experimental case, it provides robust confidence intervals, addressing data sparsity and measurement noise in experimental conditions. The study underscores the trade-offs between deterministic and probabilistic approaches and the potential of rBNNs for uncertainty-aware constitutive modeling.
Related papers
- Latent Semantic Consensus For Deterministic Geometric Model Fitting [109.44565542031384]
We propose an effective method called Latent Semantic Consensus (LSC)
LSC formulates the model fitting problem into two latent semantic spaces based on data points and model hypotheses.
LSC is able to provide consistent and reliable solutions within only a few milliseconds for general multi-structural model fitting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T05:35:38Z) - A Priori Uncertainty Quantification of Reacting Turbulence Closure Models using Bayesian Neural Networks [0.0]
We employ Bayesian neural networks to capture uncertainties in a reacting flow model.
We demonstrate that BNN models can provide unique insights about the structure of uncertainty of the data-driven closure models.
The efficacy of the model is demonstrated by a priori evaluation on a dataset consisting of a variety of flame conditions and fuels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T22:19:55Z) - Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop.
We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models.
We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z) - Structured Radial Basis Function Network: Modelling Diversity for
Multiple Hypotheses Prediction [51.82628081279621]
Multi-modal regression is important in forecasting nonstationary processes or with a complex mixture of distributions.
A Structured Radial Basis Function Network is presented as an ensemble of multiple hypotheses predictors for regression problems.
It is proved that this structured model can efficiently interpolate this tessellation and approximate the multiple hypotheses target distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T01:27:53Z) - A probabilistic, data-driven closure model for RANS simulations with aleatoric, model uncertainty [1.8416014644193066]
We propose a data-driven, closure model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations that incorporates aleatoric, model uncertainty.
A fully Bayesian formulation is proposed, combined with a sparsity-inducing prior in order to identify regions in the problem domain where the parametric closure is insufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T16:53:31Z) - Variational Inference for Bayesian Neural Networks under Model and
Parameter Uncertainty [12.211659310564425]
We apply the concept of model uncertainty as a framework for structural learning in BNNs.
We suggest an adaptation of a scalable variational inference approach with reparametrization of marginal inclusion probabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-01T16:38:17Z) - Mixed Effects Neural ODE: A Variational Approximation for Analyzing the
Dynamics of Panel Data [50.23363975709122]
We propose a probabilistic model called ME-NODE to incorporate (fixed + random) mixed effects for analyzing panel data.
We show that our model can be derived using smooth approximations of SDEs provided by the Wong-Zakai theorem.
We then derive Evidence Based Lower Bounds for ME-NODE, and develop (efficient) training algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T22:41:51Z) - Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Bayesian Convolutional
Neural Networks for Geophysical Applications [0.0]
It is common to incorporate the uncertainty of predictions such subsurface models should provide calibrated probabilities and the associated uncertainties in their predictions.
It has been shown that popular Deep Learning-based models are often miscalibrated, and due to their deterministic nature, provide no means to interpret the uncertainty of their predictions.
We compare three different approaches obtaining probabilistic models based on convolutional neural networks in a Bayesian formalism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-25T17:54:23Z) - Bayesian Imaging With Data-Driven Priors Encoded by Neural Networks:
Theory, Methods, and Algorithms [2.266704469122763]
This paper proposes a new methodology for performing Bayesian inference in imaging inverse problems where the prior knowledge is available in the form of training data.
We establish the existence and well-posedness of the associated posterior moments under easily verifiable conditions.
A model accuracy analysis suggests that the Bayesian probability probabilities reported by the data-driven models are also remarkably accurate under a frequentist definition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T11:34:08Z) - Anomaly Detection of Time Series with Smoothness-Inducing Sequential
Variational Auto-Encoder [59.69303945834122]
We present a Smoothness-Inducing Sequential Variational Auto-Encoder (SISVAE) model for robust estimation and anomaly detection of time series.
Our model parameterizes mean and variance for each time-stamp with flexible neural networks.
We show the effectiveness of our model on both synthetic datasets and public real-world benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-02T06:15:15Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.