Enhancing Semantic Consistency of Large Language Models through Model Editing: An Interpretability-Oriented Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11041v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:26:15 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Semantic Consistency of Large Language Models through Model Editing: An Interpretability-Oriented Approach
• Authors: Jingyuan Yang, Dapeng Chen, Yajing Sun, Rongjun Li, Zhiyong Feng, Wei Peng,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLM) generate inconsistent and sometimes contradictory outputs when presented with a prompt that has equivalent semantics but is expressed differently from the original prompt.<n>To achieve semantic consistency of an LLM, one of the key approaches is to finetune the model with prompt-output pairs with semantically equivalent meanings.<n>We propose a more interpretable method (i.e., model editing) to enhance the semantic consistency of LLMs.
• Score: 28.07366458452159
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A Large Language Model (LLM) tends to generate inconsistent and sometimes contradictory outputs when presented with a prompt that has equivalent semantics but is expressed differently from the original prompt. To achieve semantic consistency of an LLM, one of the key approaches is to finetune the model with prompt-output pairs with semantically equivalent meanings. Despite its effectiveness, a data-driven finetuning method incurs substantial computation costs in data preparation and model optimization. In this regime, an LLM is treated as a ``black box'', restricting our ability to gain deeper insights into its internal mechanism. In this paper, we are motivated to enhance the semantic consistency of LLMs through a more interpretable method (i.e., model editing) to this end. We first identify the model components (i.e., attention heads) that have a key impact on the semantic consistency of an LLM. We subsequently inject biases into the output of these model components along the semantic-consistency activation direction. It is noteworthy that these modifications are cost-effective, without reliance on mass manipulations of the original model parameters. Through comprehensive experiments on the constructed NLU and open-source NLG datasets, our method demonstrates significant improvements in the semantic consistency and task performance of LLMs. Additionally, our method exhibits promising generalization capabilities by performing well on tasks beyond the primary tasks.

Related papers

• SALAD: Improving Robustness and Generalization through Contrastive Learning with Structure-Aware and LLM-Driven Augmented Data [15.366930934639838]
  We propose SALAD, a novel approach to enhance model robustness and generalization. Our method generates structure-aware and counterfactually augmented data for contrastive learning. We validate our approach through experiments on three tasks: Sentiment Classification, Sexism Detection, and Natural Language Inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T15:40:10Z)
• Exploring Model Editing for LLM-based Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification [17.512415475301395]
  We investigate model editing to serve an efficient method for adapting large language models (LLMs) to solve aspect-based sentiment classification. Our findings reveal that a distinct set of mid-layer representations is essential for detecting the sentiment polarity of given aspect words. We develop a model editing approach that focuses exclusively on these critical parts of the LLM, leading to a more efficient method for adapting LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T11:21:37Z)
• Your Language Model May Think Too Rigidly: Achieving Reasoning Consistency with Symmetry-Enhanced Training [66.48331530995786]
  We propose syMmetry-ENhanceD (MEND) Data Augmentation, a data-centric approach that improves the model's ability to extract useful information from context. Unlike existing methods that emphasize reasoning chain augmentation, our approach improves model robustness at the knowledge extraction stage. Experiments on both logical and arithmetic reasoning tasks show that MEND enhances reasoning performance across diverse query variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:03:35Z)
• Improving Consistency in Large Language Models through Chain of Guidance [9.040736633675136]
  Chain of Guidance (CoG) is a multistep prompting technique that generates highly consistent outputs from Large Language Models (LLMs) We use synthetic data sets comprised of consistent input-output pairs to fine-tune LLMs to produce consistent and correct outputs. Our fine-tuned models are more than twice as consistent compared to base models and show strong generalization capabilities by producing consistent outputs over datasets not used in the fine-tuning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T20:41:37Z)
• Refining Sentence Embedding Model through Ranking Sentences Generation with Large Language Models [60.00178316095646]
  Sentence embedding is essential for many NLP tasks, with contrastive learning methods achieving strong performance using datasets like NLI. Recent studies leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate sentence pairs, reducing annotation dependency. We propose a method for controlling the generation direction of LLMs in the latent space. Unlike unconstrained generation, the controlled approach ensures meaningful semantic divergence. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves new SOTA performance with a modest cost in ranking sentence synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T12:07:53Z)
• LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Models [16.37602070339033]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate inconsistent responses when prompted with semantically equivalent paraphrased inputs.<n>We propose LF-Steering, a novel activation steering approach to precisely identify latent feature representations responsible for semantic inconsistency.<n>Our method maps the hidden states of relevant transformer layer into a sparsely activated, high-dimensional feature space based on a sparse autoencoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-19T13:06:51Z)
• Model Attribution in LLM-Generated Disinformation: A Domain Generalization Approach with Supervised Contrastive Learning [26.02988481241285]
  Modern large language models (LLMs) produce disinformation with human-like quality. diversity in prompting methods used to generate disinformation complicates accurate source attribution. We introduce the concept of model attribution as a domain generalization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T00:56:09Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimension [63.330262740414646]
  We study how to characterize and predict the truthfulness of texts generated from large language models (LLMs) We suggest investigating internal activations and quantifying LLM's truthfulness using the local intrinsic dimension (LID) of model activations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T04:56:21Z)
• Identifying Factual Inconsistencies in Summaries: Grounding LLM Inference via Task Taxonomy [48.29181662640212]
  Factual inconsistencies pose a significant hurdle for the faithful summarization by generative models. We consolidate key error types of inconsistent facts in summaries, and incorporate them to facilitate both the zero-shot and supervised paradigms of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T08:41:23Z)
• Model Composition for Multimodal Large Language Models [71.5729418523411]
  We propose a new paradigm through the model composition of existing MLLMs to create a new model that retains the modal understanding capabilities of each original model. Our basic implementation, NaiveMC, demonstrates the effectiveness of this paradigm by reusing modality encoders and merging LLM parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T06:38:10Z)
• In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax [36.98247762224868]
  In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks. Do models infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial generalizations that only generalize to identically distributed examples? In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T23:52:43Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.