Identifying Factual Inconsistencies in Summaries: Grounding LLM Inference via Task Taxonomy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12821v3
• Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 16:07:29 GMT
• Title: Identifying Factual Inconsistencies in Summaries: Grounding LLM Inference via Task Taxonomy
• Authors: Liyan Xu, Zhenlin Su, Mo Yu, Jin Xu, Jinho D. Choi, Jie Zhou, Fei Liu,
• Abstract summary: Factual inconsistencies pose a significant hurdle for the faithful summarization by generative models. We consolidate key error types of inconsistent facts in summaries, and incorporate them to facilitate both the zero-shot and supervised paradigms of LLMs.
• Score: 48.29181662640212
• License:
• Abstract: Factual inconsistencies pose a significant hurdle for the faithful summarization by generative models. While a major direction to enhance inconsistency detection is to derive stronger Natural Language Inference (NLI) models, we propose an orthogonal aspect that underscores the importance of incorporating task-specific taxonomy into the inference. To this end, we consolidate key error types of inconsistent facts in summaries, and incorporate them to facilitate both the zero-shot and supervised paradigms of LLMs. Extensive experiments on ten datasets of five distinct domains suggest that, zero-shot LLM inference could benefit from the explicit solution space depicted by the error type taxonomy, and achieves state-of-the-art performance overall, surpassing specialized non-LLM baselines, as well as recent LLM baselines. We further distill models that fuse the taxonomy into parameters through our designed prompt completions and supervised training strategies, efficiently substituting state-of-the-art zero-shot inference with much larger LLMs.

Related papers

• Understanding Chain-of-Thought in LLMs through Information Theory [16.78730663293352]
  We formalize Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) through an information-theoretic lens. Specifically, our framework quantifies the information gain' at each reasoning step, enabling the identification of failure modes. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through extensive experiments on toy and GSM-8K data, where it significantly outperforms existing outcome-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T19:14:36Z)
• Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints [20.844061807562436]
  We propose SENSE, a novel prompting approach that embeds semantic hints within the prompt. Experiments show that SENSE consistently improves LLMs' performance across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T14:35:09Z)
• DaRec: A Disentangled Alignment Framework for Large Language Model and Recommender System [83.34921966305804]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in recommender systems. We propose a novel plug-and-play alignment framework for LLMs and collaborative models. Our method is superior to existing state-of-the-art algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T15:56:23Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• Assessing LLMs for Zero-shot Abstractive Summarization Through the Lens of Relevance Paraphrasing [37.400757839157116]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance at zero-shot generation of abstractive summaries for given articles. We propose relevance paraphrasing, a simple strategy that can be used to measure the robustness of LLMs as summarizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T12:08:43Z)
• A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models [25.572035747669275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted extensive attention due to their remarkable performance across various tasks. The substantial computational and memory requirements of LLM inference pose challenges for deployment in resource-constrained scenarios. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the existing literature on efficient LLM inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T15:53:08Z)
• Unveiling the Generalization Power of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models [81.70754292058258]
  We investigate whether fine-tuning affects the intrinsic generalization ability intrinsic to Large Language Models (LLMs) Our main findings reveal that models fine-tuned on generation and classification tasks exhibit dissimilar behaviors in generalizing to different domains and tasks. We observe that integrating the in-context learning strategy during fine-tuning on generation tasks can enhance the model's generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T08:18:59Z)
• Incorporating LLM Priors into Tabular Learners [6.835834518970967]
  We introduce two strategies utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) for ranking categorical variables. We focus on Logistic Regression, introducing MonotonicLR that employs a non-linear monotonic function for mapping ordinals to cardinals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T09:27:09Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.