Investigating the Developer eXperience of LGBTQIAPN+ People in Agile Teams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13257v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:29:08 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Developer eXperience of LGBTQIAPN+ People in Agile Teams
• Authors: Edvaldo Wassouf Jr, Pedro Fukuda, Awdren Fontão,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the Developer Experience of LGBTQIAPN+ individuals in Agile software development teams. Remote work offers significant benefits for LGBTQIAPN+ professionals, including improved psychological comfort, productivity, and work-life balance.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Diversity in software teams drives innovation and enhances performance, but it also introduces challenges that require intentional management. LGBTQIAPN+ professionals in the software industry face unique barriers, including discrimination, low visibility, and harassment, which can diminish satisfaction, productivity, and retention. This study investigates the Developer Experience (DX) of LGBTQIAPN+ individuals in Agile software development teams through a survey of 40 participants. Findings highlight that psychological safety and inclusive policies are critical for fostering equitable contributions and team cohesion. Agile practices, such as retrospectives, pair programming, and daily meetings, enhance collaboration and reduce biases when tailored to the needs of underrepresented groups, creating an environment of mutual respect and openness. Additionally, remote work offers significant benefits for LGBTQIAPN+ professionals, including improved psychological comfort, productivity, and work-life balance. However, challenges like isolation and insufficient virtual team interactions remain and must be addressed. This research underscores the importance of integrating inclusivity into Agile methodologies and organizational practices to support the unique needs of diverse professionals. By fostering an environment that values diversity, organizations can enable more effective and satisfied teams, ultimately driving higher-quality outcomes and improved organizational performance. This study provides actionable insights for creating more inclusive and supportive Agile work environments.

Related papers

• Affirmative Hackathon for Software Developers with Disabilities: An Industry Initiative [2.4362104259303403]
  Lack of skilled professionals with experience in inclusive hiring and management prevents companies from effectively increasing PWD representation on software development teams. This paper reports the experience of Zup Innovation, a Brazilian software company, in hosting a fully remote affirmative hackathon with 50 participants to attract PWD developers. Our findings offer lessons for other companies seeking to address similar challenges and promote greater inclusion in tech teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T14:04:01Z)
• Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [51.452664740963066]
  Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments. We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions. Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z)
• Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web Agents [113.49968423990616]
  We introduce CASA, a benchmark designed to assess large language models' sensitivity to cultural and social norms. Our approach evaluates LLM agents' ability to detect and appropriately respond to norm-violating user queries and observations. Experiments show that current LLMs perform significantly better in non-agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:35:44Z)
• The Design Space of in-IDE Human-AI Experience [6.05260196829912]
  Key findings stress the need for AI systems that are more personalized, proactive, and reliable. Our findings show that while Adopters appreciate advanced features and non-interruptive integration, Churners emphasize the need for improved reliability and privacy. Non-Users, in contrast, focus on skill development and ethical concerns as barriers to adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T10:02:52Z)
• Exploring Hybrid Work Realities: A Case Study with Software Professionals From Underrepresented Groups [0.0]
  We investigated how software professionals from underrepresented groups are experiencing post-pandemic hybrid work. In particular, we analyzed the experiences of neurodivergents, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and people with disabilities working in the software industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-20T20:41:10Z)
• CulturalTeaming: AI-Assisted Interactive Red-Teaming for Challenging LLMs' (Lack of) Multicultural Knowledge [69.82940934994333]
  We introduce CulturalTeaming, an interactive red-teaming system that leverages human-AI collaboration to build challenging evaluation dataset. Our study reveals that CulturalTeaming's various modes of AI assistance support annotators in creating cultural questions. CULTURALBENCH-V0.1 is a compact yet high-quality evaluation dataset with users' red-teaming attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T00:25:09Z)
• Adaptive Coordination in Social Embodied Rearrangement [49.35582108902819]
  We study zero-shot coordination (ZSC) in this task, where an agent collaborates with a new partner, emulating a scenario where a robot collaborates with a new human partner. We propose Behavior Diversity Play (BDP), a novel ZSC approach that encourages diversity through a discriminability objective. Our results demonstrate that BDP learns adaptive agents that can tackle visual coordination, and zero-shot generalize to new partners in unseen environments, achieving 35% higher success and 32% higher efficiency compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T18:05:51Z)
• Can Workers Meaningfully Consent to Workplace Wellbeing Technologies? [65.15780777033109]
  This paper unpacks the challenges workers face when consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies. We show how workers are vulnerable to "meaningless" consent as they may be subject to power dynamics that minimize their ability to withhold consent. To meaningfully consent, participants wanted changes to the technology and to the policies and practices surrounding the technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:15:07Z)
• Benefits and Limitations of Remote Work to LGBTQIA+ Software Professionals [7.573586022424398]
  The mass transition to remote work amid the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected software professionals. Recent studies advocate for remote structures to create opportunities for many equity-deserving groups. This study aims to investigate the effects of remote work on LGBTQIA+ software professionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-13T03:30:22Z)
• DIAMBRA Arena: a New Reinforcement Learning Platform for Research and Experimentation [91.3755431537592]
  This work presents DIAMBRA Arena, a new platform for reinforcement learning research and experimentation. It features a collection of high-quality environments exposing a Python API fully compliant with OpenAI Gym standard. They are episodic tasks with discrete actions and observations composed by raw pixels plus additional numerical values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T14:39:10Z)
• FERN: Fair Team Formation for Mutually Beneficial Collaborative Learning [9.484474204788349]
  This work introduces FERN, a fair team formation approach that promotes mutually beneficial peer learning. We show this problem as a discrete optimization problem to be NPhard and propose a hill-climbing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T18:38:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.