Can Hallucinations Help? Boosting LLMs for Drug Discovery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13824v2
• Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:12:09 GMT
• Title: Can Hallucinations Help? Boosting LLMs for Drug Discovery
• Authors: Shuzhou Yuan, Zhan Qu, Ashish Yashwanth Kangen, Michael Färber,
• Abstract summary: Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) are often viewed as undesirable.<n>We find that hallucinations significantly improve predictive accuracy for some models.<n>We categorize over 18,000 beneficial hallucinations, with structural misdescriptions emerging as the most impactful type.
• Score: 8.960425754918974
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), plausible but factually inaccurate text, are often viewed as undesirable. However, recent work suggests that such outputs may hold creative potential. In this paper, we investigate whether hallucinations can improve LLMs on molecule property prediction, a key task in early-stage drug discovery. We prompt LLMs to generate natural language descriptions from molecular SMILES strings and incorporate these often hallucinated descriptions into downstream classification tasks. Evaluating seven instruction-tuned LLMs across five datasets, we find that hallucinations significantly improve predictive accuracy for some models. Notably, Falcon3-Mamba-7B outperforms all baselines when hallucinated text is included, while hallucinations generated by GPT-4o consistently yield the greatest gains between models. We further identify and categorize over 18,000 beneficial hallucinations, with structural misdescriptions emerging as the most impactful type, suggesting that hallucinated statements about molecular structure may increase model confidence. Ablation studies show that larger models benefit more from hallucinations, while temperature has a limited effect. Our findings challenge conventional views of hallucination as purely problematic and suggest new directions for leveraging hallucinations as a useful signal in scientific modeling tasks like drug discovery.

Related papers

• Visualizing and Benchmarking LLM Factual Hallucination Tendencies via Internal State Analysis and Clustering [2.357397994148727]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often hallucinate, generating nonsensical or false information that can be especially harmful in sensitive fields such as medicine or law.<n>We introduce FalseCite, a curated dataset designed to capture and benchmark hallucinated responses induced by misleading or fabricated citations.<n>Running GPT-4o-mini, Falcon-7B, and Mistral 7-B through FalseCite, we observed a noticeable increase in hallucination activity for false claims with deceptive citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T22:51:40Z)
• Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) present a growing challenge across real-world applications.<n>We propose a prompt-based framework to systematically trigger and quantify hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T14:33:47Z)
• Valuable Hallucinations: Realizable Non-realistic Propositions [2.451326684641447]
  This paper introduces the first formal definition of valuable hallucinations in large language models (LLMs)<n>We focus on the potential value that certain types of hallucinations can offer in specific contexts.<n>We present experiments using the Qwen2.5 model and HalluQA dataset, employing ReAct prompting to control and optimize hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T12:59:11Z)
• A Novel Approach to Eliminating Hallucinations in Large Language Model-Assisted Causal Discovery [21.2023350773338]
  We show that hallucinations exist when using large language models (LLMs) in causal discovery. We propose using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to reduce hallucinations when quality data is available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T03:06:39Z)
• LLM Hallucination Reasoning with Zero-shot Knowledge Test [10.306443936136425]
  We introduce a new task, Hallucination Reasoning, which classifies LLM-generated text into one of three categories: aligned, misaligned, and fabricated. Our experiments conducted on new datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in hallucination reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T18:55:26Z)
• A Survey of Hallucination in Large Visual Language Models [48.794850395309076]
  The existence of hallucinations has limited the potential and practical effectiveness of LVLM in various fields. The structure of LVLMs and main causes of hallucination generation are introduced. The available hallucination evaluation benchmarks for LVLMs are presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T10:58:58Z)
• MedHalu: Hallucinations in Responses to Healthcare Queries by Large Language Models [26.464489158584463]
  We conduct a pioneering study of hallucinations in LLM-generated responses to real-world healthcare queries from patients. We propose MedHalu, a carefully crafted first-of-its-kind medical hallucination dataset with a diverse range of health-related topics. We also introduce MedHaluDetect framework to evaluate capabilities of various LLMs in detecting hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T00:09:01Z)
• ANAH-v2: Scaling Analytical Hallucination Annotation of Large Language Models [65.12177400764506]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit hallucinations in long-form question-answering tasks across various domains and wide applications.<n>Current hallucination detection and mitigation datasets are limited in domains and sizes.<n>This paper introduces an iterative self-training framework that simultaneously and progressively scales up the hallucination annotation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T17:56:38Z)
• Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks. They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences. We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z)
• ANAH: Analytical Annotation of Hallucinations in Large Language Models [65.12177400764506]
  We present $textbfANAH$, a dataset that offers $textbfAN$alytical $textbfA$nnotation of hallucinations in Large Language Models. ANAH consists of 12k sentence-level annotations for 4.3k LLM responses covering over 700 topics, constructed by a human-in-the-loop pipeline. Thanks to the fine granularity of the hallucination annotations, we can quantitatively confirm that the hallucinations of LLMs accumulate in the answer and use ANAH to train and evaluate hallucination annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T17:54:40Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback [40.930238150365795]
  We propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) via fine-grained AI feedback.<n>We generate a small-size hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models.<n>Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:46:10Z)
• Hallucination Diversity-Aware Active Learning for Text Summarization [46.00645048690819]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown propensity to generate hallucinated outputs, i.e., texts that are factually incorrect or unsupported. Existing methods for alleviating hallucinations typically require costly human annotations to identify and correct hallucinations in LLM outputs. We propose the first active learning framework to alleviate LLM hallucinations, reducing costly human annotations of hallucination needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T02:30:27Z)
• On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts [74.96789694959894]
  Large language models are successful in answering factoid questions but are also prone to hallucination. We investigate the phenomenon of LLMs possessing correct answer knowledge yet still hallucinating from the perspective of inference dynamics. Our study shed light on understanding the reasons for LLMs' hallucinations on their known facts, and more importantly, on accurately predicting when they are hallucinating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T06:48:30Z)
• Do LLMs Know about Hallucination? An Empirical Investigation of LLM's Hidden States [19.343629282494774]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can make up answers that are not real, and this is known as hallucination. This research aims to see if, how, and to what extent LLMs are aware of hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:14:55Z)
• Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models [109.56911670376932]
  Large language models (LMs) are prone to generate factual errors, which are often called hallucinations. We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations and argue that hallucinations manifest in diverse forms. We propose a novel task of automatic fine-grained hallucination detection and construct a new evaluation benchmark, FavaBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T19:02:48Z)
• The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models [134.6697160940223]
  hallucination poses great challenge to trustworthy and reliable deployment of large language models. Three key questions should be well studied: how to detect hallucinations (detection), why do LLMs hallucinate (source), and what can be done to mitigate them. This work presents a systematic empirical study on LLM hallucination, focused on the the three aspects of hallucination detection, source and mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-06T12:40:45Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information. We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z)
• HalluciDoctor: Mitigating Hallucinatory Toxicity in Visual Instruction Data [102.56792377624927]
  hallucinations inherent in machine-generated data remain under-explored. We present a novel hallucination detection and elimination framework, HalluciDoctor, based on the cross-checking paradigm. Our method successfully mitigates 44.6% hallucinations relatively and maintains competitive performance compared to LLaVA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:52:58Z)
• A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions [40.79317187623401]
  The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has marked a significant breakthrough in natural language processing (NLP) LLMs are prone to hallucination, generating plausible yet nonfactual content. This phenomenon raises significant concerns over the reliability of LLMs in real-world information retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T09:25:37Z)
• HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [146.87696738011712]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to generate hallucinations, i.e., content that conflicts with the source or cannot be verified by the factual knowledge. To understand what types of content and to which extent LLMs are apt to hallucinate, we introduce the Hallucination Evaluation benchmark for Large Language Models (HaluEval)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T15:36:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.