Exploring the sustainable scaling of AI dilemma: A projective study of corporations' AI environmental impacts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14334v2
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:50:32 GMT
- Title: Exploring the sustainable scaling of AI dilemma: A projective study of corporations' AI environmental impacts
- Authors: Clément Desroches, Martin Chauvin, Louis Ladan, Caroline Vateau, Simon Gosset, Philippe Cordier,
- Abstract summary: We propose a methodology to estimate the environmental impact of a company's AI portfolio.
Results confirm that large generative AI models consume up to 4600x more energy than traditional models.
Mitigating the environmental impact of Generative AI by 2030 requires coordinated efforts across the AI value chain.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), has raised concerns regarding its global environmental impact that extends beyond greenhouse gas emissions to include consideration of hardware fabrication and end-of-life processes. The opacity from major providers hinders companies' abilities to evaluate their AI-related environmental impacts and achieve net-zero targets. In this paper, we propose a methodology to estimate the environmental impact of a company's AI portfolio, providing actionable insights without necessitating extensive AI and Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) expertise. Results confirm that large generative AI models consume up to 4600x more energy than traditional models. Our modelling approach, which accounts for increased AI usage, hardware computing efficiency, and changes in electricity mix in line with IPCC scenarios, forecasts AI electricity use up to 2030. Under a high adoption scenario, driven by widespread Generative AI and agents adoption associated to increasingly complex models and frameworks, AI electricity use is projected to rise by a factor of 24.4. Mitigating the environmental impact of Generative AI by 2030 requires coordinated efforts across the AI value chain. Isolated measures in hardware efficiency, model efficiency, or grid improvements alone are insufficient. We advocate for standardized environmental assessment frameworks, greater transparency from the all actors of the value chain and the introduction of a "Return on Environment" metric to align AI development with net-zero goals.
Related papers
- From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
Much of this debate has concentrated on direct impact without addressing the significant indirect effects.
This paper examines how the problem of Jevons' Paradox applies to AI, whereby efficiency gains may paradoxically spur increased consumption.
We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z) - Towards Environmentally Equitable AI [23.332350246411124]
We advocate environmental equity as a priority for the management of future AI systems.
We uncover the potential of equity-aware geographical load balancing to fairly re-distribute the environmental cost across different regions.
We conclude by discussing a few future directions to exploit the full potential of system management approaches to mitigate AI's environmental inequity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-21T08:46:19Z) - Transforming the Hybrid Cloud for Emerging AI Workloads [81.15269563290326]
This white paper envisions transforming hybrid cloud systems to meet the growing complexity of AI workloads.
The proposed framework addresses critical challenges in energy efficiency, performance, and cost-effectiveness.
This joint initiative aims to establish hybrid clouds as secure, efficient, and sustainable platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T11:57:43Z) - Toward Cross-Layer Energy Optimizations in AI Systems [4.871463967255196]
Energy efficiency is likely to become the gating factor toward adoption of artificial intelligence.
With the pervasive usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools and techniques, their energy efficiency is likely to become the gating factor toward adoption.
This is because generative AI (GenAI) models are massive energy hogs.
Inference consumes even more energy, because a model trained once serve millions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T01:35:17Z) - Toward Sustainable GenAI using Generation Directives for Carbon-Friendly Large Language Model Inference [8.567865555551911]
This paper presents Sprout, an innovative framework designed to reduce the carbon footprint of generative Large Language Model (LLM) inference services.
Our proposed method balances the need for ecological sustainability with the demand for high-quality generation outcomes.
We demonstrate a significant reduction in carbon emissions by over 40% in real-world evaluations using the Llama2 and global electricity grid data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T16:53:53Z) - DeepEn2023: Energy Datasets for Edge Artificial Intelligence [3.0996501197166975]
We propose large-scale energy datasets for edge AI, named DeepEn2023, covering a wide range of kernels, state-of-the-art deep neural network models, and popular edge AI applications.
We anticipate that DeepEn2023 will improve transparency in sustainability in on-device deep learning across a range of edge AI systems and applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T16:54:36Z) - On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades.
The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness.
To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z) - A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection
in Industrial Environments: Performance and Environmental Impact [62.997667081978825]
This study seeks to address the demands of high-performance machine learning models with environmental sustainability.
Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Decision Trees and Random Forests, demonstrate robust efficiency and performance.
However, superior outcomes were obtained with optimised configurations, albeit with a commensurate increase in resource consumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-01T15:18:00Z) - AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance.
We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks.
Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z) - Towards Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of
Environmental Protection Uses and Issues [0.0]
This paper describes the paradox of an energy-consuming technology serving the ecological challenges of tomorrow.
It draws on numerous examples from AI for Green players to present use cases and concrete examples.
The environmental dimension is part of the broader ethical problem of AI, and addressing it is crucial for ensuring the sustainability of AI in the long term.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-22T14:31:48Z) - Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the
first step towards sustainable AI [47.130004596434816]
In eco2AI we put emphasis on accuracy of energy consumption tracking and correct regional CO2 emissions accounting.
The motivation also comes from the concept of AI-based green house gases sequestrating cycle with both Sustainable AI and Green AI pathways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-31T09:34:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.